similar to: Samba with NFS

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Samba with NFS"

2007 Apr 03
1
overflow error
Hello all, I'm having a problem with an overflow error and I was hoping to get some help. The client is Red Hat ES 3 running kernel version 2.4.21-4.ELsmp, rsync version 2.5.6 The server is Novell 6.5 SP6 running rsync version 2.6.3 I'm consistently getting the following error on the receiving end (server): overflow: flags=0x69 l1=110 12=1633837871 lastname= ERROR: buffer overflow
2007 Jun 23
4
Zaptel Compilation
Hi List; I am facing a problem relaed to menuselect when I am trying to compile zaptel -1.4.2.1, the error as following: [root at localhost zaptel-1.4.2.1]# make linux26 make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.4.4/zaptel-1.4.2.1/menuselect' make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.4.4/zaptel-1.4.2.1/menuselect' make[3]: Entering directory
2008 Mar 05
5
C compiler cannot create executables when building zaptel
When attempting to build zaptel I get the following error: configure:2184: error: C compiler cannot create executables vi config.log configure:2066: $? = 0 configure:2073: gcc -v >&5 Using built-in specs. Target: i386-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-checking=release
2007 Jun 23
1
Zaptel Compilation Error
Hi List; I think my problem in Zaptel compilation is related to autoconf: no input file, anyone has an advise? Also, I did a change in the Makefile existed in the following path: /usr/src/kernels/2.6.20-1.2319.fc5-i686/ EXTRAVERSION = 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5 Now, if I run uname -r then I get output: 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5 But the directory under the kernels is: 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5-i686 So do I have to
2007 Apr 12
2
vmx status report against changeset 14797 - 4 old issues
New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You
2007 Mar 22
1
Valid Users setting causing crash
Hey list, Having a strange issue on a new File server. This system is running the 64-bit version of Fedora 5 running kernel 2.6.20-1.2300.fc5 and version 3.0.24-1.fc5 of Samba. This system is functioning as a backup to a primary system that is configured the same way. Same OS, hardware, etc. After moving data over and setting up the users and groups, I moved over the smb.conf file as well. In
2006 Aug 24
2
installing the x86_64 R Binary on Fedora Core 5
I am looking for help install the x86_64 R Binary onto my FC5 machine. At the risk of subjecting myself to tons of criticism, I must confess that I don't know anything about Linux and I have never compiled R from source. Therefore, I choose FC5 because I see that a 64-bit binary is already available. Here is what I tried: I installed FC5 with all options (productivity, software development,
2007 Apr 23
4
vmx status report against changeset 14887 - No new issue, 3 old issues
New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network
2006 Jun 26
1
FC5 32-bit vs 64-bit
Hello, I am a biostats student and a newbie to R. I have a question about 32-bit vs. 64-bit. I am running FC5 on a AMD 3800+ with 2GB Ram. With 64-bit, I am running into some issues the stability of FC5. A friend suggested I ditch the 64-bit version of FC5 for the 32-bit. I do not currently have any pressing needs for the capabilities of the 64-bit OS. Before I reinstall the 32-bit
2007 Feb 21
1
Problem Installing Zaptel
While trying to compile zaptel 1.2.8 on a FC5 I get the following error: /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build make -C /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5-smp-i686' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.o In file included from /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.c:40:
2007 Jun 14
3
My Kernel
Hi List; I did yum install kernel and yum install kernel-devel, now when I type 'uname' -a I have the following: [root@localhost /]# 'uname' -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 14 16:05:46 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And when I type rpm -q kernel, then I have the followig: [root@localhost /]# rpm - q kernel kernel-2.6.20-1.2319.fc5 So the
2006 May 13
3
Firefox 1.5.0.3 in CentOSPlus?
Seeing Fedora have released 1.5.0.3 for fc5 isn't it time for CentOS to rebuild 1.5.0.3 for CentOSPlus or does the current rpm have the patches? I recall last times goof in FC5 firefox appearing in the CentOS one so I assume that CentOSPlus needs to rebuild the FC5 one again. __________________________________________________ Improve the mailing list by performing a simple search before
2005 Jan 14
2
"connection unexpectedly closed" error
Hi, I'm sure I'm missing something simple but I can't find it. We just set up a new server with Fedora Core 2 and I'm trying to set up an rsync to it. I've had this working to a Debian machine, so I'm almost sure my config is rsync config is good. I'm running rsync 2.6.2-1 in daemon mode on the server with the following config file: log file =
2006 Sep 18
2
FC5 smbpasswd not working
Hello, we run samba 3.0.14a on FreeBSD. We recently upgraded our linux clients from FC2 to FC5. Now smbpasswd (on the client) does not work. We get the following error: "cli_pipe_validate_current_pdu: RPC fault code NT code 0x1c010002 received from remote machine sambaserver pipe \samr fnum 0x70f3! machine sambaserver rejected the password change: Error was : NT code 0x1c010002. Failed
2006 Jun 13
2
Compiling zaptel on FC5
Are there any generic install guidelines for compiling the Zaptel drivers on FC5? This is my first install of Asterisk (and my first FC5 system) and I'm having a great deal of trouble getting it to cooperate. make clean and make are definitely not playing nice, telling me that "You don't appear to have the kernel sources installed" when I'm pretty sure that I do. Any
2006 Jun 23
3
No eth0 in DomU in FC5
If I try to ifup eth0, I get the following: Device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. DomU: Linux fedora1 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU #1 SMP Tue Jun 6 02:58:27 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux config: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU" #ramdisk="/boot/initrd-2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU.img" memory = 128 name = "fedora1" #dhcp = "dhcp" disk =
2007 Jun 18
1
Do I really have the right ATrpms repo?
I copied exactly where Axel provided into atrmps.repo. I have the line: atrpms.repo:baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el5-x86_64/atrpms/stable but the rpms that are being flagged as updates pretty much all have fc5 in their names. e.g.: ---> Package mplayer-fonts.noarch 4:1.0-7.at set to be updated ---> Package mplayer.i386 4:1.0-60_r23482.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package
2007 Feb 19
3
Unable to boot guest
Hi All, I have just installed xen on fedora core 5. I used yum to install xen and kernel-xen0 (and their dependancies) I can reboot into the new domain0 without issue. When I try and configure a new domain using xenguest-install.py it gets to the point of wanting to install, and then fails. I have mounted the Fedora Core 5 DVD on /var/www/html/fc5 and the webserver is running, and it is also
2006 Oct 10
2
Can't Write to Samba Share
Can anyone help me to figure out why I can not write to a share? I was able to join the domain without a problem, and I can read the share from an xp box. I just cannot write to it: "Access denied". thanks specs: FC5 samba-common-3.0.23c-1.fc5 samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 smb.conf: [global] name resolve order = host disable netbios = yes workgroup = DOMAIN realm = DOMAIN.COM
2006 Jun 29
5
newhidups failing with Nova 1100 on FC5
I have been testing out my new MGE Nova 1100 on a system (dual Athlon) running Fedora Core 5 and the newhidups driver seems to be regularly dying. The UPS is the USB model, I have nut-2.0.3-0.1.fc5 and nut-cgi-2.0.3-0.1.fc5 installed. I am running a 2.6.16 kernel. (I haven't upgraded to FC5's 2.6.17 kernel yet as there seem to be some complaints about it.) The driver initially works.