similar to: Invalid hash for xattr (system.posix_acl_access) associated with [NULL]

I could use some help trying to recover VMs on a system that used to run xen-3.0.0 under sarge. The host (Domain0) bit the dust, so I rebuilt it using SUSE Linux 10.1 which has xen-3.0.2-2 packages. xend is running and I can do xm list, xm info and so on. It still sees the LVM volume groups that the VM data resides on. My VMs are sitting on /dev/vg20/vol01, /dev/vg20/vol03 .... Because I lost

Hi, I've created an test enviroment for btrfs 0.11. The aim of the test is to compare speed of btrfs to ext3, reiserfs, jfs, xfs, etc. I've created an 70 GB partition for btrfs, created btrfs filesystem on it, which is currently mounted under /data. I put the kernel source tree of Linux 2.6.24 to the btrfs, make allyesconfig, and i've created the following script: while true; do

As mentioned on Google+, I have a partition that I can no longer mount normally, containing a lot of my personal data and all backups from my laptop. I found now that I am still able to mount it using the ''nospace_cache'' option, but it takes a couple of minutes and I get "INFO: task btrfs-transacti:1698 blocked for more than 120 seconds." messages reporting the thread

I have an Adaptec 392320 Ultra320 SCSI adapter. I am running x86_64 SLES9 SP3. When I build x86_64 Xen with just the 2.6-xen kernel + initrd, I am getting the following error on the module load. But if I go back to building separate xenU and xen0 kernels without initrd the device works without any issues. Any idea what is going wrong here? Am I leaving something out of my initrd? Here is the

Can someone tell me how to build festival on a machine with gcc 3.3.2? I've searched all around and even found a reference or two that the problem exists but I'm not seeing the fix. thanks! -reed Symtoms are -- ./configure, then.... [root@telephone speech_tools]# make Check system type Remake modincludes.inc NATIVE_AUDIO ok EDITLINE

Hello, I am in need of a Samba Performance Consultant immediatley. My box is just not fast enough, and I still have 8 business hours left. Consultant should recommend: - fastest Samba options for our setup - fastest Linux kernel options / sysctl parameters - fastest Windows client options / registry settings I expect to pay $500 for 2 hours of your time. You should be an expert. Its 12:30

Hi, I've recently benchmarked btrfs v0.11 & v0.12 against ext2, ext3, ext4, jfs, reiserfs and xfs. OS: Ubuntu Hardy Kernel: 2.6.24(-5-server) Hardware: --------- Fu-Si Primergy RX330 S1 * AMD Opteron 2210 1.8 GHz * 1 GB RAM * 3 x 73 GB, 3Gb/s, hot plug, 10k rpm, 3.5" SAS HDD * LSI RAID 128 MB Fu-Si Econel 200 * Intel Xeon 5110 * 512 MB RAM

I have been having a printing problem recently on a setup that has worked for quite some time. Configs below. The symtoms are slightly different on a W2K and a WinME workstation, but the result is the same; no printed output. However, when I print from the local Unix server or from any other Unix server in the network the output is as expected. The W2K machine reports 'Access denied,

I'm running Samba 3.0.23c-3 on Debian Testing (Etch_) with kernel 2.6.17-2-686. ACL and XATTR support is built into the kernel. The samba package installed has support for ACL and XATTR. I have a reiserfs filesystem mounted with the acl and user_xattr attributes. I have this box connected to a native mode Active Directory Domain with kerberos and winbind, which are working correctly. I

All. I am running Xen on an ES7000 system with 4 procs and 4 GB memory. I am running Suse Sles-9 (32-bit) on the machine. I have compiled Xen (the tip on the unstable tree : 6552) with PAE enabled (XEN_TARGET_X86_PAE=y). The system boots fine. I started xend and when I tried to bring up a virtual machine, the system gave me the following error on the command line. On the serial port, I saw an

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> In preparation for removing security_old_inode_init_security(), switch to security_inode_init_security(). Commit 572302af1258 ("reiserfs: Add missing calls to reiserfs_security_free()") fixed possible memory leaks and another issue related to adding an xattr at inode creation time. Define the initxattrs callback

the old one back in out of desperation and, BAM, all the problems went away. There were no other symtoms that pointed at that switch so we didn't suspect it all. Re: [Samba] Win98 troubles - Resolved Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 14:59:21 +0000 Message-ID: <20030808.cdU.52098400@ocicat.crandell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

HI All. I'm using tiff-v.3.5.7 and spandsp-0.0.1k with latest * cvs on Slackware-10.0. Here is debug messages from * console. Please advise. Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 0ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Training failed (sequence failed) Fast

Hi guys, I've got a Samba PDC configured, with authenticating off an LDAP backend. My client is trying to set permissions through Windows, and for some reason no matter what I try the "everyone" group is always showing up as having access. When an admin user tries to set permissions on the share through windows I get the following errors in my /var/log/messages Feb 27 11:28:16

> > Well, i''m using here the qla2340 on several boxes. It works > > with Xen 2.0 but noch with Xen 3.0. as part of SUSE Linux 10.0: > > Interesting. If the driver really doews work flawlessly in > Xen 2, then I think the culprit has to be interrupt routeing. > > Under Xen 3, does /proc/interrupts show you''re receiving interrupts? I cannot boot with

> > Well, i''m using here the qla2340 on several boxes. It works > > with Xen 2.0 but noch with Xen 3.0. as part of SUSE Linux 10.0: > > Interesting. If the driver really doews work flawlessly in > Xen 2, then I think the culprit has to be interrupt routeing. > > Under Xen 3, does /proc/interrupts show you''re receiving interrupts? I cannot boot with

[ Received no feedback, i resend it... ] A little strange things, but i'm hitting my head on the wall... I needed to 'enlarge' my main filesystem (XFS backed-up), that contain my main samba share and a brick for a GFS share; i've setup a new volume (for the VM), formatted XFS, move all the file taking care to umount and stop GFS (so, syncing the brick, not the GFS filesystem)

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on individual LSM decision. Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the ability to specify one

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu at huawei.com> One of the major goals of LSM stacking is to run multiple LSMs side by side without interfering with each other. The ultimate decision will depend on individual LSM decision. Several changes need to be made to the LSM infrastructure to be able to support that. This patch set tackles one of them: gives to each LSM the ability to specify one

On 07/26/2016 1:26 PM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 26/07/16 19:08, Jim Seymour wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:37:51 -0500 >> Dale Schroeder <dale at BriannasSaladDressing.com> wrote: >> >> [snip] >>> Jim, >>> >>> This may be your problem: Samba 4.3.9 >>> >>> Upgrading my NT4 domain from 4.2.x to 4.3.x and beyond broke