similar to: Problem with Defaulting Groups and AD

Vital Stats - AMD 64-bit CPU, Ubuntu 7.0.4 (Feisty Fawn), Samba 3.0.24, Win2003 AD Domain If I've left anything out, please feel free to ask. This *was* working yesterday until my Kerberos ticket expired. (growl) Anyway, now that Kerberos appears to be working again, all of my users still only have read access - no write access. The "temp" test works fine. Exactly as expected

Well, I've discovered something and I'm not sure how to make it stop doing it. When a user "logs in" they get an automatically assigned group of "domain users" which doesn't actually exist in any of the file permissions. I've tried setting group = %G and force group = %G but neither one is working. If anyone knows how to suppress this, I'd be greatly

I received another response from these people. Again, the information sounds encouraging. :) -- Mark Nipper e-contacts: Computing and Information Services nipsy@tamu.edu Texas A&M University http://arrakis.tamu.edu/nipsy/ College Station, TX 77843-3142 AIM: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617

I'm trying to move from SSH1 to OpenSSH 2.9.9p2, under Solaris 8. Initial setup and testing seems to work... including the generation of a new RSA key. The key was created with "ssh-keygen -t rsa" and a passphrase; nothing unusual. I can SSH between machines, both running 2.9.9p2, and debug messages show that this file is being correctly read (I think). It prompts me for the

I've just recently switched from old ssh to OpenSSH 2. So far no major problems, until now. I'm logging in from Linux to Solaris 8. Both are running 2.9.9p2. Under ssh-1.2.28 I would fire off several xterms, exit, and properly get the "waiting for forwarded X11 connection" message, and then be able to type ~& (as documented) to get back to the shell. The channel was kept

I was going to explore the infinite possibilites offered by PAM, winbind, NIS, and alpha17, but it never got past the build stage. Sigh. Note that 2.2.3a built just fine with this same machine, same compiler (GCC 3.0.4), and same OpenSSL (0.9.6b). Not just the same versions, but the files themselves haven't moved. 27% pwd /tmp/pedwards/samba-3.0-alpha17/source 28% make Using FLAGS

Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears! Or, in this case, your eyes. It has become a problem I've noticed over and over again, that we tend to think the mailing list is some sort of forum, used to post whatever your hearts desire. This list, not unlike any other mailing list, has a purpose. A focus if you will. Hopefully this 'document' will point out some key things we

Hello, I have a data frame, one element in that data frame is a LIST, with each element being a character string. I am trying to extract the first year listed in each of those character strings. The character elements are typically csv, but the position of the year can vary (think citations with varying citation standards). I.e., foo$a [[1]] [1] text, text, 2001, text [2] text, 2000, text [3]

Hello, This is a question for folks who are using Ubuntu to host your Rails apps. Which version of Ubuntu do you use? Do you use the ''Dapper'' release (6.0.6) perhaps due to the long term support (LTS), or are you using the latest release ''Feisty'' (7.0.4)? Or maybe a better way to ask the question is, is there a preferred version of Ubuntu to use with Ruby

i am sure that there is a simple solution that i am just overlooking, but there is no logical test for = there is one for != and >,<, >=, <=... what do i do if i need to check if something IS EQUAL or is there an easy way, in working with a matrix of size n x 3, to sort the matrix by one of the columns? specifically what i am trying to do is i have a matrix with individual and

me again, new to R, haven't programmed in a long time at all sorry to ask what is probably basic a while ago i asked how to remove an element from a list apparently what i am using is not a list but a vector, didn't realize there was a list data type could also use a matrix for what i am doing, is there a way to remove single elements from either of those? thanks for any help, if i was

I'm still not fully understanding exactly how R is handling data frames, but am getting closer. Any help with this one will likely go a long way in getting me there. Let's say I have a data frame, let's call it "a". Within that data frame i have two variables, let's call them "b" and "c", where "b" is a single numeric value per observation,

i am having some problems with a program that i am writing and i think that knowing how the while command works will help me to figure out where i am going wrong *when do you get kicked out of a while loop?* (i.e., in the following example what would the final value of 'a' be?) i thought it would be 99 but running it in R i get 101 (and 101 for x too!) while (x <100) { for (i in

This patch uses the standard generic header for the definition of machine_emergency_restart() and reverses the call path for XenoLinux. Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com> --- diff -r 7680b29c03a6 drivers/xen/core/reboot.c --- a/drivers/xen/core/reboot.c Sat Aug 05 11:33:24 2006 -0400 +++ b/drivers/xen/core/reboot.c Mon Aug 07 09:50:33 2006 -0400 @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include

Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi

Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218 914-945-1854, Email: yuh@us.ibm.com ----- Forwarded by Hao Yu/Watson/IBM on 10/31/2006 09:52 AM ----- Jimi

i am probably just missing this one, but how can i check to see if a number is a part of a vector? i know i could do a loop checking for equivalence for each element, but i am thinking that there must be a simpler way to do it than that ( i think that i have even done it in the past, but can't remember how!) thanks what i am working with: (hope this makes sense) arclist [1] 2 2 6

The first to members of a grant entry are updated as a combined pair. The following union patch uses a union so updated can happen in an endian neutral fashion. Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com> diff -r 1f611b58729f xen/common/grant_table.c --- a/xen/common/grant_table.c Wed Aug 09 18:53:00 2006 -0400 +++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c Fri Aug 11 12:29:48 2006 -0400 @@ -32,6

UseRs, I tried to install the MatchIt package on Ubuntu 7.04. When loading required dependencies I got the following error message: Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) : unable to load shared library '/usr/local/lib/R/site-library/optmatch/libs/optmatch.so': /usr/local/lib/R/site-library/optmatch/libs/optmatch.so: cannot map zero-fill pages: Cannot

As mentioned earlier, PowerPC''s atomic ops operate on longs, and we have made our *_bit() prototypes use long* (instead of void*) to warn us of problems at compile time. Here''s one caller that was flagged: test_and_set_bit(nr, &softirq_pending(cpu)) Accordingly, we need __softirq_pending to be long, not int. PowerPC is currently using a few files unmodified from the x86