similar to: UPDATE - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED making remote directory

Vital Stats - AMD 64-bit CPU, Ubuntu 7.0.4 (Feisty Fawn), Samba 3.0.24, Win2003 AD Domain If I've left anything out, please feel free to ask. This *was* working yesterday until my Kerberos ticket expired. (growl) Anyway, now that Kerberos appears to be working again, all of my users still only have read access - no write access. The "temp" test works fine. Exactly as expected

Vital Stats - AMD 64-bit CPU, Ubuntu 7.0.4 (Feisty Fawn), Samba 3.0.24, Win2003 AD Domain I'm not sure how to make it stop doing it. When a user "logs in" they get an automatically assigned group of "domain users" which doesn't actually exist in any of the file permissions. I've tried setting group = %G and force group = %G but neither one is working. If

I received another response from these people. Again, the information sounds encouraging. :) -- Mark Nipper e-contacts: Computing and Information Services nipsy@tamu.edu Texas A&M University http://arrakis.tamu.edu/nipsy/ College Station, TX 77843-3142 AIM: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617

I'm trying to move from SSH1 to OpenSSH 2.9.9p2, under Solaris 8. Initial setup and testing seems to work... including the generation of a new RSA key. The key was created with "ssh-keygen -t rsa" and a passphrase; nothing unusual. I can SSH between machines, both running 2.9.9p2, and debug messages show that this file is being correctly read (I think). It prompts me for the

I've just recently switched from old ssh to OpenSSH 2. So far no major problems, until now. I'm logging in from Linux to Solaris 8. Both are running 2.9.9p2. Under ssh-1.2.28 I would fire off several xterms, exit, and properly get the "waiting for forwarded X11 connection" message, and then be able to type ~& (as documented) to get back to the shell. The channel was kept

I was going to explore the infinite possibilites offered by PAM, winbind, NIS, and alpha17, but it never got past the build stage. Sigh. Note that 2.2.3a built just fine with this same machine, same compiler (GCC 3.0.4), and same OpenSSL (0.9.6b). Not just the same versions, but the files themselves haven't moved. 27% pwd /tmp/pedwards/samba-3.0-alpha17/source 28% make Using FLAGS

> OK I finally figured out the second noise problem. It's a riddle > wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma. Judging by the somewhat odd > structure of le_short() and be_short(), I think this keeps coming up > over and over again. Even Apple's byte swapping macros fail under > certain circumstances, and here's why: Funny thing is you seem to be the first to report

I have performed the 5.1 update via the 5 repo on a couple of systems. I then went to switch these systems to my new local repo using ther $releasever variable. It still has the value of 5, not 5.1 Where is this set? Why was it not changed to 5.1? On the one clean install from the 5.1 isos, $releasever is at 5.1 I think.

On Apr 21, 2007, at 3:53 PM, zmorris@mac.com wrote: > On Apr 21, 2007, at 12:36 PM, zmorris@mac.com wrote: > >> Hi, I tried both the stable and beta versions of the speex source >> code download on Mac OS 10.4.9. I just do: >> >> ... >> >> However, when I play the output file, I get the header and a >> second of audio, but the rest is just

Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears! Or, in this case, your eyes. It has become a problem I've noticed over and over again, that we tend to think the mailing list is some sort of forum, used to post whatever your hearts desire. This list, not unlike any other mailing list, has a purpose. A focus if you will. Hopefully this 'document' will point out some key things we

Stimate Domn (Doamna), Imi permit sa va prezint oferta noastra de teren (loturi de 500mp) in apropierea plajelor Corbu si Vadu (10 km nord de Mamaia) langa viitoarea Statiune EUROPA, terenuri cu propunere intravilan, intr-o zona superba, ce cunoaste o dezvoltare accelerata in ultimii 2 ani, deschizand posibilitati avantajoase de investitie pe termen scurt si mediu sau ofera sansa

I am fairly sure Samba will ignore GP password policies, but if you set the policies with the samba tool command, then it should adhere to it, unless you are running across the bug I mentioned. You would see multiple badPwdCount increases for one bad password in the logs if you are experiencing that bug. -James Crouch On Aug 19, 2016 2:26 PM, "Ricardo Pardim Claus" <ricardo.claus at

Are you using the "samba-tool domain passwordsettings" command to set the lockout policy, or are you using group policy? -James Crouch On Aug 19, 2016 2:03 PM, "Ricardo Pardim Claus" <ricardo.claus at yahoo.com.br> wrote: > > > Dear James, > Thanks for the input. > > Even increasing from 5 to 10, the amount of times to miss the password and > lock

James, I configured the account lockout policies by RSAT, GPEDIT.MSC. By GPEDIT.MSC I set the value = 10 attempts. Through the samba-tool, I used this command: # samba-tool domain passwordsettings set --account-lockout-threshold=11 INFO: Current debug levels: ... pm_process() returned Yes Module 'tombstone_reanimate' is disabled. Skip registration.lpcfg_servicenumber:

RE: "net rpc rights grant testpc1 SePrintOperatorPrivilege -U testpc1" Failed to grant privileges for testpc1 (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED) samba_source_3.3.7 on redhat 5 64bit. I have root on the samba server but I don't have admin access to active directory (hence the auth using testpc1). Does the user granting access need some sort of admin privilege in Active Directory? How do

Remarque : message transf?r? en pi?ce jointe. __________________________________________________________________ D?couvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 250 Mo d'espace de stockage pour vos mails ! Cr?ez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com/

I just compiled Samba 3.3.7 on Ubuntu 8.04. I copied the new libnss_winbind.so.2 library under /lib and the ?getent group? command works fine. The ?net use? of the resource is OK. I?m verifying the problem (SMBntcreateX) NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED reported in the log.smbd file when I try to create a folder or to move a file in the samba resource. The same operation on Samba 3.2.14 is OK. Regards,

Hi! I have a lot of those log line : smbd[3604]: [2010/01/27 13:22:32, 1, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(744) smbd[3604]: create_connection_server_info failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED smbd[3604]: [2010/01/27 13:22:32, 1, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(744) smbd[3604]: create_connection_server_info failed:

hi:) for an unkonow reason the users are not able to connect to samba. samba member of domain, ads security. no changes on samba side. if i run: smbclient -U% -L ip Domain=[INT] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.28a] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED all the other commands are ok: wbinfo getent testparm do you have any ideea? thank you:) Gabi

I am trying to migrate our Windows NT 4 Domain to Samba 3.4.3 and got the error message below when I run the command: "net join -S myPDC -I 172.30.1.1 -U administrator%mypasswd" worked ok "net rpc vampire -S myPDC -U administrator%mypasswd" Fetching DOMAIN database Failed to fetch domain database: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED What I want to accomplish is to remove Windows NT 4.0