similar to: Re-4: limit login

xp home can join the domain just needs a bit of hacking read http://www.ntcompatible.com/story8718.html regards ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Damien Dye BSC(hon) IT and Telecommunications Engineer Mckenna Group Lawn Road Industrial Estate Lawn Road Carlton-in-Lindrick Worksop Nottinghamshire United Kingdom S81 9LB Email :

yes please this would fix problems with have with user loggin on at one end of the site then at the other later. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] limit login (05-Sep-2007 10:52) From: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE To: damiend@mckennagroup.co.uk > Hi! > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 11:08:31AM +0200, Pascal Legrand wrote: > > > i'm looking for a

you disable the USB mass storage service in the windows registry. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\USBSTOR] "Type"=dword:00000001 "Start"=dword:00000003 ------- Alter me to 1 I think "ErrorControl"=dword:00000001 "ImagePath"=hex(2):73,00,79,00,73,00,74,00,65,00,6d,00,33,00,32,00,5c,00,44,00,\

Hi all. Last thursday I've had to restore my customer's pdc from an hdd failure, and by the evening I restored a full working state of server and clients, rejoining all of them to the domain. Next morning the customer called me saying that nothing was working, I looked the server from remote without finding failures and then I went there: I found that clients couldn't find the pdc

no I don't have invalid users = root "net rpc rights list -U root" gives Could not connect to server 127.0.0.1 The username or password was not correct. Connection failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE smb.conf setting are # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2007/08/17 16:32:50 [global] workgroup = MCKENNAGROUP realm =

Hello, I ran into an interesting problem earlier today. I have a Unix machine I maintain in a largely Windows shop. They use Windows Backup for their backups, and so I created a readonly share of the entire filesystem with one user, "backup", who is an admin user. This lets them back up the entire Unix machine by attaching to the "backup" share, but nothing can be changed.

Hello list. I'm new here, and I'm joining because I'm having a problem wich I can't figure out the solution myself. Here's what's happening: A Samba 3.0.24 is serving files to seven Windows XP clients. Three of those clients run an application with a BDE database. The problem is that when running this application on Samba, it gets very, VERY slow, causing it to hang. I

hi hector adding the following to smb.conf should cure the problem map read only = no regards ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Damien Dye BSC(hon) IT and Telecommunications Engineer Mckenna Group Lawn Road Industrial Estate Lawn Road Carlton-in-Lindrick Worksop Nottinghamshire United Kingdom S81 9LB Email : damiend@mckennagroup.co.uk Tel :

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [Samba] NBIPX, "local" problem? Date: Friday 26 October 2007 From: damiend@mckennagroup.co.uk To: julius.junghans@gmx.de I think samba requires TCP/IP and will not work on ipx -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Samba] NBIPX, "local" problem? (23-Oct-2007 22:30) From: julius.junghans@gmx.de To:

Hello All! I am using Samba Version 2.2.7a on a RedHat linux 9 box.Some .php files are stored on the Samba server and Users are accessing these files from windows system.They are using EditPlus to work on these .php files.Problem is that when more than one users are accessing the same file,they are unable to perform write operation on the file.E.g suppose user A has opened a file with RW

is the share crossing mount points. if so you will need wide links set to yes -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Samba] reiserfs, samba, symlinks and windows (13-Mar-2008 16:34) From: jason.gerfen@scl.utah.edu To: damiend@mckennagroup.co.uk > I thought that as well at first but if I change the default share to > '/tmp' I am able to map the drive but I am NOT

On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > > Date sent: 06 Oct 2012 10:37:00 +0200 > From: Hullen at t-online.de (Helmut Hullen) > To: syslinux at zytor.com > Organization: Hullen BS > Subject: [syslinux] Error 0400 > Send reply to: helmut at hullen.de, >

Is that with an active directory domain controller? On Apr 3, 2016 11:21 PM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote: > my conf win10 no problem: > client NTLMv2 auth = Yes > client lanman auth = No > server max protocol = SMB3_11 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = SMB3_11 > client min protocol = CORE > >

Hi Helmut, Thank you for your mail. The distribution is Debian linux 7.9. I am talking of a fresh installation, and of course of it's update after. Thank you for helping. Regards Le 19 avr. 2016 06:08, "Helmut Hullen" <Hullen at t-online.de> a écrit : > Hallo, Jules, > > Du meintest am 18.04.16: > > > Is it recommended to install the tarball or archive

2009/8/2 Helmut Hullen <Hullen at t-online.de> > Hallo, Arnaud, > Hi Again Helmut, > > Du meintest am 02.08.09 zum Thema Re: program "nutupsdrv": > > >> the man page "nutupdsdrv.8" does exist, it refers to a program > >> "nutupsdrv". But there is no such program - is there an error in the > >> man page? > >

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Helmut Hullen <Hullen at t-online.de> wrote: > I don't have the ia64 files which are needed for a complete binary. But > maybe that's only my special problem. IA64 is Itanium. I'd guess you mean x64/x86-64. I think it may also go under the label "IA32-64". -- -Gene

Thank you for the responses! Hi Helmut, I actually prefer moving into a newer version that has all the great new features, but due to policies inside our firm it will be a long process. I find the idea of modifying the new version Samba to start up like the old version. Very crafty! :) Hi Volker, yes we do have a support contract with Red Hat and Oracle. The version we are currently using is

Hi, I have the same problem as Helmut with INCLUDE keyword and extlinux 5.10 an later. The following configuration has been tested and worked with extlinux 4.05, 4.06, 5.01 Contents of "boot_label" file DEFAULT 1 --------------------------------------- Contents of "extlinux.conf" file # Enable menu.c32 UI menu.c32 # Disable the boot: prompt PROMPT 0 # 5 sec TIMEOUT 50 #

On Mon, 24 Jun, at 06:27:00PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > In file included from /tmp/syslinux-6.00/efi/mem.c:3:0: > /tmp/syslinux-6.00/efi/efi.h:33:5: error: unknown type name 'EFI_SERVICE_BINDING' [...] > Where is the problem: on the syslinux side or on the slackware side? Or > somewhere else? You need a newer version of gnu-efi, gnu-efi 3.0u, which is the release

Hallo, I've just tried to compile Samba 4.0.0alpha14 under Slackware 13-current - it failed. 206 warnings, 257 errors, and last famous words ---------------- cite on --------------- [2152/2374] Linking default/source4/heimdal_build/libroken-samba4.so [2153/2374] Linking default/source4/heimdal_build/libasn1-samba4.so /lib/libcom_err.a(error_message.o): In function `et_list_unlock':