similar to: samba-error: tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME

Hello, On a computer, a sparc64 with Debian, with hostname tw89 and domain name KUDDE thinks `smbpasswd` that the domain name is TW89 | tw89:~ | # grep workgroup /etc/samba/smb.conf | # Change this to the workgroup/NT-domain name your Samba server will part of | workgroup = KUDDE | tw89:~ | # ldapsearch -LLxW -H ldaps://tw89 -D cn=admin,ou=people,dc=gst,dc=stappers,dc=nl \ | -b

Dear list, Samba allows our school to use on non-free operation systems on work stations. Or should I rather put it this way: In combination with Debian-Edu, Samba allows us to use free operations systems on servers and work stations despite the fact that some colleagues stick to Windows... Now, we observe a problem that still needs to be examined further on: If the server has been running

Dear list, our Debian Edu system used to be stable like a rock. After holidays, I encountered an issue as follows: The last 8 of 20 clients in our cabinet cannot log in to samba, their message is "domain not available". I checked cables and switches - and IPs (from 2nd boot partition running Debian Edu without problem), nothing that differs from other machines. It stroke me that all

Hi, I have a windows 7 machine withouth local administrator account. I need to create such an account. I can log in to the machine with a user on my samba domain. What do I need to do in order to get administrator access, or access to create an local administrator account? I have tried to do this: [root at float samba]# net rpc group addmem "Administrators" 'DOMAIN\username'

Hello, I googled for a while in order to find a solution to make dovecot work with local and virtual users. My Mailserver setup looks like the following: virtual users are stored in a mysql database, and having their Mailbox here: /srv/mail/$domain/$uid/ Local users have a Maildir folder in their home directory. The only point i found in the web concerning this issue is this post here:

Hallo, I know this problem is marked as solved, but here is another solution, a solution which makes it possible still to use smbfs. I have been working on a project connecting Skolelinux ltsp-server to a windows 2000 server in norwegian secondary school and came across the same problem ( that is one of the teachers and his students in my school did first). Searching the net I found the

Package: xen-3 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for xen-3. CVE-2008-2004[0]: | The drive_init function in QEMU 0.9.1 determines the format of a raw | disk image based on the header, which allows local guest users to read | arbitrary files on the host by modifying the header to identify

Hi, I'm a teacher and I have got 20 computers with Windows XP and server Windows SBS 2003 with Active Directory. I use AD to set policy tu WinXP and to authorize users. Is it possible to set up Samba to this instead AD? Can someone help me in this? -- Przemyslaw Adam Smiejek

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222 ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2002-04-18 23:07 ------- Could you please try CVS -current with the following patch. You will need to regenerate configure using autoconf. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

--l4Siqd0eqV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I run the following job. Please, compare the results of summary and table concerning berufl. From similar SPSS/PSPP runs, the result of table is correct. Did I misunderstand anything or is there a bug? What does the difference come from? What does '(other)' mean? What about the strange

A bit more then a curiosity. Mobing from Samba/NT to Samba/AD i'm now switching some 'one-purpose' (mostly containers) from libpam-ldaps to libpam-krb5. In these box normally i don't need user access, so i create 'manually' (eg, in /etc/passwd) only the admin users, and i add only the PAM layer to do external auth. Still i use ssh keys for direct root access, but as an

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=222 Summary: configure finds getnameinfo() but not getaddrinfo() Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.1p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org

Hi What is the status of this security bug? The fedora crew decided to disable the access to the QEMU monitor via VNC. Does the debian team want to take the same road? Some sort of applied patch for this is attached (but still needs to be checked). Some short feedback on this bugreport would be much appreciated. Thanks for your efforts. Cheers Steffen -------------- next part -------------- A

Package: xen-3.0 Severity: important Hi The following CVE[0] was issued against xen. Can you please check, if the Debian versions are affected? The CVE says: The VNC server implementation in QEMU, as used by Xen and possibly other environments, allows local users of a guest operating system to read arbitrary files on the host operating system via unspecified vectors related to QEMU monitor

Dear Xen Maintainers The following CVEs(0,1) have been filled against xen. Could you please check, whether they affect any debian versions and how important they are? They are rather left over on our TODO list and I'd like to forward them to you for checking. CVE-2008-1944: Buffer overflow in the backend framebuffer of XenSource Xen Para-Virtualized Framebuffer (PVFB) Message 3.0 through

Package: xen-unstable Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for xen-unstable. CVE-2008-2004[0]: | The drive_init function in QEMU 0.9.1 determines the format of a raw | disk image based on the header, which allows local guest users to read | arbitrary files on the host by modifying the

Package: xen-3 Severity: important Tags: security Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for xen-3. CVE-2008-4405[0]: | xend in Xen 3.0.3 does not properly limit the contents of the | /local/domain xenstore directory tree, and does not properly restrict | a guest VM's write access within this tree, which allows guest OS | users to cause a denial of

Hi, we are using Debian Woody with Samba 3.0.4 backport. The Clients are Windows XP pro. Since we use this version of Samba a problem occurred twice: In a huge directory there are files not shown in the Explorer. The files are there, the rights are ok, if we want to overwrite the file, Windows says that it is there, but it is not shown. An example: Ablaufinformation - EB-Wahl Okt 02.doc (not