similar to: testing samba performance

Regarding Perfctr-Xen (see announcement below), some have requested author''s version of the published paper. It is available on my website: http://people.cs.vt.edu/~rnikola/?page_id=159 Please, let me know what you think. Also, I want to iterate my point regarding Perfctr-Xen vs XenoProf: XenoProf is useful but has a number of limitations such as system-wide monitoring only.

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > Thanks for the reply :-) > I am actually looking for ways to determine "size" of code segment when the program is in native code. > Any suggestions to do that ? Compile it with llvm to a native .o or .exe file, then run 'size' on it? E.g.: llvm-gcc x.c -o a.out -Wl,-native size ./a.out -Chris > Chris Lattner <sabre

Thanks for the reply :-) I am actually looking for ways to determine "size" of code segment when the program is in native code. Any suggestions to do that ? Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > Hey, > > I have written a pass and wishes to measure its performance overhead > after running it over a

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > Hey, > > I have written a pass and wishes to measure its performance overhead > after running it over a program.I also wish to measure the size of code > segment once the program is in native code.What are the easy ways in > llvm to achieve this?Are there any tools available in llvm for the same I'm not sure specifically

"Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 17:52 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav> There is a one PCIe RAID controller in a chasis. AVAGO Miloslav> MegaRAID SAS 9361-8i. And 16x SAS 15k drives conneced to Miloslav> it. Because the controller does not support pass-through for

On May 12, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Montag, den 12.05.2008, 09:08 -0700 schrieb Devang Patel: >> On May 12, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: >> >>> 2) What is the relative performance of code generated by LLVM >>> and gcc respectively? >> >> See llvm.org/nightlytest > > Which does not compare GCC vs. LLVM.

Hi all.. i'm new to this samba things I was wondering, is there any tools that available, i mean in open source term in purpose to measure the samba performance.. What I mean in performance is a software that can measure I/O operation, file throughput , network traffic and etc..etc.. Actually I want to compare samba and SMB implementation in windows. Is there anyone has done this before

In my setup I'm running Samba 3.0.23d-19.2 and CUPS 1.2.7-12.1. Printing from a windows-client works fine, until I instruct CUPS to add a banner-page. The banner-page then is the only thing that gets printed. Doing the same from Linux everything works fine. I get my job including a banner-page. The Windows-printjob is passed raw from Samba to CUPS... Anyone has an idea? Best, Johannes

Hello, I do a Migration from NT4 to Samba + LDAP, I already join Samba to NT4, when I type net rpc vampire -S NT -U Administrator%nt, the following error occur, [2007/12/28 00:13:16, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel(2673) cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel: failed to get schannel session key from server NT for domain SFA.[2007/12/28 00:13:16, 0]

Hi all, I currently have a OCZ Vertex 4 SSD as a ZIL device and am well aware of their exaggerated claims of sustained performance. I was thinking about getting a DRAM based ZIL accelerator such as Christopher George''s DDRDive, one of the STEC products, etc. Of course the key question i''m trying to answer is: is the price premium worth it? --- What is the (average/min/max)

In the past, i had used this method: http://icecast.org/loadtest/1/ But to be honest, nothing be compared with real use case, we found many issues when the connections arrive from many differents IPs, the stress test open all from small set of IPs, but almost this test case is used for many others, and present good results. 2016-06-10 2:40 GMT-03:00 Popov, Zahar <zahar.popov1978 at

Dear list, I get some strange results with daply from the plyr package. In the example below, the average age per municipality for employed en unemployed is calculated. If I do this using tapply (see code below) I get the following result: no yes A NA 36.94931 B 51.22505 34.24887 C 48.05759 51.00198 If I do this using daply: municipality no yes

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:11:24PM +0530, karthik iyer wrote: > So my idea goes like this. Basically I have been working on Question > Answering systems. I developed a QA system for "when" type questions (sorry > I cant provide the source code at the moment because my paper is under > review at SIGIR 2014). I used the part-of-speech and developed a weighted > scoring

Hello, I working on a model to predict probabilities. I don't really care about binary prediction accuracy. I do really care about the accuracy of my probability predictions. Frank was nice enough to point me to the val.prob function from the Design library. It looks very promising for my needs. I've put together some tests and run the val.prob analysis. It produces some very

Hi there, I was asking this question already a few days go, but I'm not sure whether anyone noticed due to the mailserver outtage. So I'm just re-posting it, sorry, but it's an important issue for me, I would be glad to hear some insight on this. The question is regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card.

Hi Zahar, what value has into <workers>8</workers> This value is recommended to set at 1 by virtual core. I 'm using for some years, KH branch with 35 concurrent listeners into 8 core vm. Regards, Alejandro 2016-06-10 0:50 GMT-03:00 Zahar Popov <zahar.popov1978 at yandex.com>: > Hello > I'm trying to measure the performance of the icecast relay server on

Good noon, On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:50 +0900, Zahar Popov wrote: > Hello > I'm trying to measure the performance of the icecast relay server on > 64kbps streams. > > The server is running in AWS [...]. I'm using the icecast-kh fork. > [...] > I'm able to go up to around 9K simultaneous connections to the server > (from two machines). [...] First: -kh is a

Hi there, I got a question regarding throughput performance using linux 2.4.5.1. My setup is very simple : I have two laptops with a wireless card. On each laptop I configure the wireless cards to be in ad hoc mode, create a bridge and include the interface within the bridge (stp is off). Then of course I'm assigning an IP address to the bridge while assigning 0.0.0.0 to the wireless

Hi Philipp Thank you for chiming in. The only reason i use the -kh fork is because it seemed to be more recent. I had this performance issue with the regular version and tried the fork. I realize that the problem can be with the TCP stack parameters. I had no problem getting about 800Mbps between these machines when using iperf. Certainly, the workload completely different, but at least i know

Please share your config, almost the LIMITS part, this is my setup <limits> <workers>8</workers> <clients>100000</clients> <sources>700</sources> <queue-size>524288</queue-size> <client-timeout>30</client-timeout> <header-timeout>15</header-timeout>