similar to: Solved: ldapsam backend for standalone server - is it possible?

Hi, List, I am wondering if it is possible to set up a standalone server with ldapsam backend. I mean, not to set it up as a domain controller; ideally I don't want a windows domain but would like to stick with the windows workgroup mode. All the samba officail documents and other docs on the web are for set it up as a [primary|backup] domain controller. Below I list the mimimal working

Hello, I'm using wine-0.9.35, and when running an application Wine tells me to install the Windows version of Mono. I have done this (version 1.2.3), but it still fails to run. The relevant error is: Unhandled Exception: System.TypeInitializationException: An exception was thrown by the type initializer for System.Windows.Forms.ThemeEngine ---> System.ArgumentException: FontFamily

Hi, I am trying to set up a CentOS 4 machine with various iSCSI mounts for Oracle, but devices keep on moving around, causing the mounts to fail while called by the sd[a-f] names. We thought about using labels, but, as some of the partitions do not use EXT3, that was discarded, so we thought about using udev and by-id. The problem is that udev does not seem to create the by-id folder or any

Hi, I am trying to set up a firewall rule so calls to old_mailserver:25 get redirected to localhost:25. I have seen quite a few rules and none seem to work. I have tried with the firewall enabled (configured to allow smtp) and disabled, but it doesn't seem to make a difference. One of the commands I have been using is: /sbin/iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp -d old_mailserver_ip/32

Hi, I am following the guide here: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/contributing_to_ruby_on_rails.html I have an ubuntu 11.04 VM setup, installed rvm, and ruby (ruby 1.8.7 (2011-06-30 patchlevel 352) [x86_64-linux]). Pulled down the rails from github and created a 3.0 branch: $ git branch --track 3-0-stable origin/3-0-stable $ git checkout 3-0-stable I can run the non-db tests ok, all pass

I have had a TDM400 with 2 FXO and 2 FXS working for ages (>12 months). It has stopped working. All four green lights are still lit. I have rebuilt zaptel and asterisk and restarted but the problem persists. /sbin/ztcfg -vvvv Zaptel Configuration ====================== Channel map: Channel 01: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 01) Channel 02: FXO Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 02) Channel 03:

Recently I've seen several suggestions on this list for the enabling of "use sendfile" as a means to improve throughput. I thought this was peculiar since the doc says it is enabled by default. I guess it isn't. On both RHEL4 (Samba v3.0.10) and Fedora Core 4 (Samba v3.0.14) the entry for "use sendfile" in the smb.conf says: Default: use sendfile = yes Hmm.

Greetings, Before I start digging into making our local passdb plugin work with Samba 3.0.25, is there any heads up I need to know about? I tried to compile the example plugin in samba-3.0.25/examples/pdb, but it fails. See below for a sample of the error messages. If I try to compile the same example that comes with Samba v3.0.24, the example code compiles without any issues? Any

Maybe it's stuck in a library call loop. Try ltrace -p 2170 -f -o smbd.2170.ltrace.out -Marc > -----Original Message----- > From: Kel Way [mailto:kpwspam-samba@yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:06 AM > To: Denis Vlasenko; samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] A smbd process pegging CPU at near 100% with v3.0.10- > 1FC2 RPM > > > strace -p

I have a Diva Server BRI installed in a Debian system running Asterisk 1.2.22. When a call comes in the Background application plays a couple of times. Halfway through the second time, the call is disconnected (total time connected about 25 seconds). I've posted various configs below. Any advice on how to debug would be appreciated. We are located in New Zealand. CLI showing capi debug (just

Hi, Does someone know a document which explains the TDB structure. functionalites, and format of the TDB files etc. I need to understand why some of the TDBs like messages.tdb, unexpected.tdb, brlock if not read_only, locking.tdb, session.tdb, wins.tdb are called with TDB_CLEAR_IF_FIRST tdb flags. Why some TDBs are opend with O_RDWR|O_CREAT flags viz. gencache.tdb, group_mapping.tdb,

An inherited system has the following configuration: passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://10.10.10.10 smbpasswd guest What is the purpose of using multiple backends? The smb.conf man page simply states that each backend will be searched in turn but why would one ever use such a setup? Secondly, the man page does not mention the 'guest' backend. To me such a backend implies that an

Hello everybody, I've setup a file server with Debian GNU/Linux (Sarge) and Samba v3.0.10 with ACL, Kerberos etc... so I can join the Windows 2000 domain. I can use users from domain on file server without problems and Windows 2000, XP clients can access Samba shares. But when I try to connect to \\fs from Windows 98 client (in domain) it requests password from me (\\fs\IPC$). I have

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 04:13:30PM +0000, Howard, Stewart Jameson wrote: > gencache_notrans.tdb > gencache.tdb > mutex.tdb Just a side-remark: These tdbs have nothing to do with ctdb, they are purely local. > Because of the current steady size of this file compared > to its repeated, intermittent, and rapid inflation, we > suspect that there is some operational condition which

[samba v3.0.24, gentoo w/ kernel 2.6.15] I'm hoping someone has some insight into the following problem that I've recently encountered: Basically, winxp seems to be creating roaming profiles that are incompatible with another winxp client. I've got two sets of winxp clients, which I'll call 'new' and 'old'. Profiles created (and perfectly usable) by the old

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > We've had a strange issue after following the recommendations at > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ping_pong, particularly the part > about mmap coherence. We are running CTDB/Samba over a MooseFS > clustered FS, and we'd not done the ping-pong before. After finding > that the mmap coherence test did not pass, we

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:15:31PM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > As a test, I changed the opening of the locking.tdb and brlock.tdb > files to use the TDB_INTERNAL flag, avoiding use of the fcntl(F_SETLK) > syscall for locking individual database records. Performance was a lot > snappier, with quite a bit less system time used. > > What is the scope of implementing shared

Hi, We are a small company, which has just started using samba. Recently we have faced a few issues regarding the TDBs getting corrupted. I have read that the only way of getting around this issue, is to regularly take tdbbackups. But, this process needs a downtime of my samba server, which we would not want. Instead, is there a way where I can take the tdbbackup with out shutting down samba

I'm trying to use rsync (version 2.6.9) to back up some files. However, a few of them contain Hebrew characters. While I can back them up, the filenames come through scrambled (I don't have Hebrew characters anymore). I've tried the -8 switch, but that didn't work. Any suggestions? Background: The files are created on Windows and saved on a samba share (v3.0.24). I can copy

Hi all, I've recently managed to compile Samba v3.0.24 for OS/2 and have debugged most of the issues. The positive is that relatively few source changes were required to get the daemon working, however, having said that, there are two problems that I'm still having trouble with. 1) smbpasswd is generating a broken password - so password protected clients can't connect. eg.