similar to: TDB functionality document

Hello, I have problems to connect my pc to my samba server. I can log in to the server and I can se some folders but i can't access them. The error message i recive in the log file looks like this: [2006/04/26 15:20:22, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(250) [2006/04/26 15:20:22, 3] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(251) se_access_check: user sid is

Hi, We have Windows2k machines connected and authenticated with Samba. We also have MIT kerberos for Linux systems. What we want to do is using samba as a gateway, clients using Windows2k machines can access their AFS file space. We are trying to encrypt the usernames and passwords and send to samba side which then decrypt and retrieve the plain-text password. Does Samba have

On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:15:31PM +0100, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > As a test, I changed the opening of the locking.tdb and brlock.tdb > files to use the TDB_INTERNAL flag, avoiding use of the fcntl(F_SETLK) > syscall for locking individual database records. Performance was a lot > snappier, with quite a bit less system time used. > > What is the scope of implementing shared

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.3 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes and new features added since 3.0.2a that we feel it is important make it available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in this preview

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.3 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes and new features added since 3.0.2a that we feel it is important make it available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in this preview

Hi, We are a small company, which has just started using samba. Recently we have faced a few issues regarding the TDBs getting corrupted. I have read that the only way of getting around this issue, is to regularly take tdbbackups. But, this process needs a downtime of my samba server, which we would not want. Instead, is there a way where I can take the tdbbackup with out shutting down samba

Hi, I have a specific question about the SMB 2 (or CIFS 2 version protocol). SMB2 was introduced with Microsoft Vista and is a redesign of the older SMB protocol. (http://wiki.ethereal.com/SMB2) Is current samba 3.0.xx release (or samba 4 release) support this protocol when vista client tries to establish session with the samba server. What are the features or advantages of getting this

============================================================= "Just play. Have fun. Enjoy the game." Michael Jordan ============================================================= Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.14 include: o Certain xattrs cause Windows error 0x800700FF

============================================================= "Just play. Have fun. Enjoy the game." Michael Jordan ============================================================= Release Announcements ===================== This is is the latest stable release of Samba 3.6. Major enhancements in Samba 3.6.14 include: o Certain xattrs cause Windows error 0x800700FF

Hi, I was able to successfully configure my samba server 3.0.24 running on Debian Linux server as "Domain Member Server" to W2k3 server. Command "net rpc testjoin" indicates that the join is a success. As mentioned in the document http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/NetCommand.html Under the section "Nested Group Support" I was trying to

On 2016-01-10 at 17:58 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/01/16 17:05, Partha Sarathi wrote: > > > > > This could have a lot to do with the fact that idmap_rid & > > > idmap_autorid calculate the uids differently i.e if you have RID > > > '2025000', autorid would calculate this as '1102500000' , rid > > > would calculate this as

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. There have been several issues fixes since the 3.0.2a release and new features have been added as well. See the "Changes" section for details on exact updates. Common bugs fixed in Samba 3.0.3 include:

Thanks for the reply. Now we end-up with mix uid/gid from both ranges in cache TDBs. Few user logins are denied with below error in smbd.log, *[2016/01/07 11:39:44.475960, 1, pid=5202] ../source3/auth/token_util.c:430(add_local_groups* ** SID S-1-5-21-3082371790-1274690562-2878062458-5771 -> getpwuid(10005771) failed** wbinfo --user-info=mariond mariond:*:10015138:110000513:Marion,

I have a read only share and a couple of printers exported that I would like to be available under a single hostname. to that end, I have a created a hostname that refers to two ip addresses, each being a separate machine. I have configured samba identically on each system and everything appears to work ok for a little while until our printing tdb becomes corrupted and everything hangs up.. (at

Am 07.04.2016 um 16:34 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: >> What does that mean? That the users and the group don't exist in >> /etc/passwd and /etc/group on the new server? I realize I could try >> as I >> write this ... no, does not change a thing. > > That is what it means. The upgrade needs that NSS data to import the > information into the AD database. I had

I use fedora 7 and the last stable version of samba 3.0.25a-3 on an embedded linux system as a server and a windows xp. I 'am using truecrypt and sharing de mount directory with the XP machine via samba. Selniux is disabled. Everything works well such as connection or small files transfers but we have a huge problem when we try to transfer a big file (~100 MB) from the client (Windows) to the

We have a print server running RHEL 4, w/ samba-3.0.33-0.15.el4 When viewed from windows, one queue on the system has the "remains" of 264 print jobs - some dating back to April, but I can't find where the information is coming from. Apparently the jobs print fine, but then the information sticks in the queue information. Running lpq on the Samba system shows: # lpq -a no

Hi Jeremy, Thanks so much for your reply! As a matter of fact, we did just that around 3:45p yesterday when our CTDB cluster was unable to self-heal from the latest in this series of failover events. Here's how the situation went down: 1) We saw flapping identical to that described in my original post 2) After about 30 minutes of waiting, CTDB was just spinning with `smbd` repeatedly

On 03/07/16 13:06, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: >> We've had a strange issue after following the recommendations at >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ping_pong, particularly the part >> about mmap coherence. We are running CTDB/Samba over a MooseFS >> clustered FS, and we'd not done the ping-pong before.