similar to: clearing out the .recycles?

Using Samba 2.2.5 on FreeBSD 4.5. We have a file share used by several people working on common projects. The share is set up with force group = cad create mask = 0774 force create mode = 0774 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0775 so that everyone can create/modify any file in the share. The new VFS recycle bin, however, sets the file

Folks, Kevin Korb wrote: > Have you considered more advanced methods such as subvolume snapshots > provided by ZFS and BTRFS? At work we were forced to abandon rsync > - --link-dest because of the amount of time it takes to delete old > backups when the data is primarily many millions of small files > (shared web hosting company). We don't have more advanced methods like

Hello, VERSIONS tried: 3.0.9 and 3.0.10 Function: Domain Controller Summary: Using the recycle vfs module, files deleted are not "touched" Details: I've set up VFS recycle so that when a user deletes a file it gets moved to the .salvage directory. recycle:touch = yes is set, but the moved (deleted) file still contains the original time stamp when doing an "ls -al".

hi, i got a small problem with the recycle under samba-3.0.0beta2-1 on a redhat 9.0 machine. when i delete file the files move to the recycle bin. when i check the recycle bin all files are in the main directory and not with the directory structure. my /etc/samba/recycle.conf looks so: name = .recycle # mode : # KEEP_DIRECTORIES = retain directory hierarchy of deleted file, #

Denis, I have checked this and verify that this is a bug. You can track the progress towards fixing this from https://bugzilla.samba.org as bug #210. Thanks for the feedback. - John T. On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Denis Heitbrock wrote: > supplement: > [Verkauf] > vfs objects = extd_audit recycle > vfs object = recycle:repository=.recycle recycle:versions=True > recycle:touch=True

rsync folks, Henri Shustak <henri.shustak at gmail.com> wrote: > LBackup always starts a new backup snapshot with an empty directory. I > have been looking at extending --link-dest options to scan beyond just > the previous successful backup to (failed backups / older backups). > However, there are all kinds of edge cases which are worth considering > with such a changes. At

Peter, I was about to post the below to the rsync mailing list, but wondered whether your code which captures rsync output may have allowed rsync to continue past what I think would normally be a fatal error? Thanks Rob. P.S. Should I put the final backups of the old pearcey /home back into their correct slots - 5 backups were recycled, but nothing was added to them? The .Snapshots area is

I have: interfaces = lo0, eth2 and: socket address = 192.168.3.1 socket address = 127.0.0.l in my smb.conf, but when I try to "net group add anything" (on server running samba 3.5.2, as a DC): <asks for current log'ed in users's password> mypwd Could not connect to server 127.0.0.1 Connection failed: NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED So what am I missing? Shouldn't

Hi, you're right about kvno. kvno dc gives me: dc at DOMAIN.NET.PL: kvno = 1 I'm pretty sure I didn't change dc$ password nor keytab wasn't recreated (the file is from 2015). I've checked other DCs. It looks like two of them with CentOS 7 have kvno = 2, and one with CentOS 6 has also v 1. DCs on CentOS 7 are pretty new, with samba version 4.7.4 from the scratch. Main DC

Hi all... There seems to be an issue with the recycle bin module for samba 2.2.8a.... When files are deleted, the time/date is not touched to the current time/date, making it hard to write scripts that empty the trash based on deletion date..... Strangely enough, the time/date of deleted folders is touched Anyone having the same problem ? -ipguy

Forgot to CC the list. -------- Original Message -------- SUBJECT: Re: [Samba] Can't add users to well known groups... DATE: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:51:31 +0200 FROM: Fran?ois Legal TO: Linda Walsh Not sure if this is relevant, but if (first case shown down here) "Domain Admins" is not so much a group but a map to unix group, I'm not surprised that you

Try verifying kvno from the client that gives the error message. That kvno = 2 for dc$ must've come from somewhere. You can also double check e.g. via ADUC ldap attributes of the dc$: lastpwdset and kvno. If  kvno is definately 1 that means that client connecting has some error, if it's 2, than it means that dc has outdated keytab. And if it's the former, than I really am not sure

Hi. How stable and tested is the Recycle module? In particular, the version that's supplied with Debian Etch. The reason I ask is that some files have gone from one of our servers (so says a user, anyway). They were supposedly in a share that uses the recycle module, but there's no copy in the recycle directory or the place they thought they were. Of course it's more likely user

Recently some folks in our engineering group started encountering a problem where they can't write to or alter files or folders they did not create. Anyone know what could be causing this type of problem? The users having the problem are all in the eng group is /etc/groups. smb.conf for that share: smb.conf: #smb.conf is the main Samba configuration file. You find a full commented #

Rowland, How exactly does this command work? recycle:repository = .recycle/%U Does the command create user folders with '.recycle' sub folders? On 3/17/2015 10:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 17/03/15 14:05, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is this the preferred method for adding a recycle bin to a share? >> Share is located on a Samba 4.1.17 member

Am I missing something here? Unless I am wrong, the "Recycle Bin" works only on LOCAL drives. I have not seen any options for network drives on any of my 95, 98 or NT clients, or NT servers. Somebody correct me if I am wrong, and tell me how to enable it. Like Jonathan Kelly, I mirror network drives at night to a backup server which writes them to tape during the day. The backup

Hello Folks, I tried create a valid gem repository under windows without luck (rubygems show problem with CRLF/LF line endings between *nix and windows). Anyway, I''ve uploaded a new gem to my webpage: http://www.mmediasys.com/releases/mongrel_service-0.3.1-mswin32.gem Whats new? Beside the things added in previous announcement [1], this version add basic process monitoring. What

Hi, have you some idea? Lukas ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 08:27:53 +0200 From: deseyve@linuxbox.cz To: Dale Schroeder <dale@BriannasSaladDressing.com> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] VFS recycle & force user I tried both - recycle:repository = .recycle/%U and also recycle:repository = .recycle/%u But with same result - samba maked

Hello everyone. I have tested this in my testing env. there's no this bug in my test env with the same smb.conf. the system version and the samba version are the same in testing and production env. the difference is that the samba in production env is update from version 4.4.4 to 4.6.2 to 4.7.1， and the samba in testing env is directly using version 4.7.1. any suggestion ? thanks.

Hello guys, I configured the recycle in my fileserver, but when I logged in with normal user and delete some files, folders, etc, the errors occurs. ./addc-pc-01.log:28251: recycle: mkdir failed for .recycle with error: Permission denied ./addc-pc-01.log:28252:[2017/06/13 14:15:11.816085, 3] ../source3/modules/vfs_recycle.c:582(recycle_unlink) ./addc-pc-01.log:28253: recycle: Could not create