similar to: Buffalo Terastation with 3.0.23d PDC and LDAP backend?

hm, I stand correct on the problem solved statement below. Ip addresses are simply not cooperating on the 2nd node. root at vault1:~# ctdb ip Public IPs on node 0 192.168.120.90 0 192.168.120.91 0 192.168.120.92 0 192.168.120.93 0 root at vault2:/service/ctdb/log/main# ctdb ip Public IPs on node 1 192.168.120.90 0 192.168.120.91 0 192.168.120.92 0 192.168.120.93 0 root at

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 12:17:56 -0700, Computerisms Corporation via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > hm, I stand correct on the problem solved statement below. Ip addresses > are simply not cooperating on the 2nd node. > > root at vault1:~# ctdb ip > Public IPs on node 0 > 192.168.120.90 0 > 192.168.120.91 0 > 192.168.120.92 0 > 192.168.120.93 0 > >

Hi Martin, Thanks for reading and taking the time to reply >> ctdbd[89]: Unable to get RECORD lock on database locking.tdb for 20 seconds >> /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/debug_locks.sh: 142: >> /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/debug_locks.sh: cannot create : Directory >> nonexistent >> sh: echo: I/O error >> sh: echo: I/O error > > That's weird. The only

Hi, I have recently set up an old machine as a linux fileserver (Intel 815E board with 512MB ram and PIII 800mhz). I am running the latest Fedora Core 5 with the version of samba 3 that ships with that and am exposing a single share for my software raid (4x400gb PATA seagate drives, running from two siig ATA cards so each drive has its own channel) I also have a buffalo 1.0tb terastation

Hi there. I'm using samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2 on CentOS release 5.7 x86_64 to mount a Terastation filesystem. The "file_mode" and "dir_mode" options to mount.cifs seem to be ignored; I systematically get a "drwxrwxrwx" permission, no matter what values I provide for these options: # mount.cifs //terastation/Backup /bkp/BackupPC/ -o

I did a similar DC upgrade from 4.1.13 to 4.6.6(like your option 1, upgrade on existing AD servers, I have two, first upgrade on none-FSMO). and I don't have any issues with the DC upgrade itself. But be careful with your member servers. After the upgrade, I have to change some default values on file servers: 1. samba 3.5.10 member server(rpm from CentOS 6.2) lost connection to samba

Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute (Buffalo,NY) is an independent, non-profit research facility that is committed to improving human health through biomedical research. In addition to that, it's a really cool place to work. HWI is a casual, low stress environment. Each of us is very busy with our work, but it is work that we enjoy. Even though our retirement plans are very good,

I have been tasked with having a Buffalo Terastation Pro 2 NAS box, likely to be connected to a Linux box via samba, be the storage device to back up mostly Ubuntu and Centos systems. ?The trick is, the machines to be backed up need to do so in an automated fashion and make a secure, encrypted connection to my Linux box hosting the NAS. The NAS does have SSL enabled for web admin access, though

If I run apt-get install samba, this only seems to retrieve the latest version of samba. How do I retrieve an earlier version of samba? Alternatively, how do I disable NTMLv2 on my Linux PC? The settings in the link below work for Windows 7 and I can access my Terastation again from Windows 7, but how do I do this on a Linux PC (Ubuntu 14.04)?

I have two Linux 2.6 based devices that cannot talk properly to each other on a Samba session setup. (those two devices are Buffalo Terastation Pro II rackmount TS-RHTGL/R5 F/W 1.33 and Request Media Server F Series, v5.3.1.3478) Basically, the NAS provides with a share that Request application uses to store media content. The problem we experience is that the NAS yet refuses a SMB client, while

Can you read from a file that is currently being written to in an Samba environment? I tried it on a Buffalo Terastation and a Windows NT File server and got the message "file in use" every time. Imagine recording a TV show from 8pm to 9pm onto an Samba server. If I come home at 8:15, can I start watching it immediately, or do I have to wait until 9:00?

Hello all, Our Samba AD DC is running perfectly for years with the following basic setup (see smb.conf below) : - one DC running Samba 4.1.7 / CentOS 6.5 (compiled from sources) - internal DNS - this DC is also a Print Server - about 400 PC workstations (mainly win7 Pro / win10 Pro and some XP Pro), and about 300 users - several Synology NAS file servers

Hello All, I build a new Storage Server to backup my data, keep archives of client files, etc I recently had a near loss of important items. So I built a 16 SATA bay enclosure (16 hot swappable + 3 internal) enclosure, 2 x 3Ware 8 port RAID cards, 8gb RAM, dual AMD Opertron. I have a 1tb boot drive and I put in 8 x 1.5tb Seagate 7200 drives. In the future I want to fill the other 8 SATA bays

All, Since upgrading to 3.0.23d on several linux servers, I'm seeing the following error repeatedly in my logs: Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: [2007/01/02 15:05:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2332) Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90078): Currently not implemented. Aside from the obvious, what does this error mean? I've googled for

Hi I have problem with Mac OS X - when users trying save data from Mac's desktop or application (e.g. Quark) to share from Samba appear error "The Finder cannot complete the operation because some data in "file_name" could not be read or write (Error code -36)". When I copy data on Mac to Samba share from terminal everythink is OK. I found that resolution of this

I have a Samba-3.0.23d installed on a CentOS4.4 server that cannot be connected to from other machines in the same W2K3 ADS. The server was added to the ADS successfully via "kinit admin@REALM" and "net ads testjoin" works just fine. The clocks are NTP-synced and no clock slew errors are to be seen. If WinXP/Win2K3 clients connect using \\ip.address\ it works fine, but if they

Mrs.; I have a 16-bits Cobol program running at Novell 5.1. I'm migrating the whole network (around 150 terminais) to Linux + LTS processing DOSEMU into cluster and making a storage server just for data. My surprise last week was that the smbfs client for Linux doesn't support the file locking, after googling, found that a solution would be to use CIFS instead SMB and upgrading the

I'm new to Kerberos. I don't understand how Samba uses the system keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab) when "use kerberos keytab = true". Does Samba use service specific tickets? What tickets does Samba add? Do I need a cron job to keep them fresh or does Winbind take care of it? Sorry if these are elementary questions, but the Samba HOWTO didn't help me understand Samba's

Hi list, Im using Samba 3.0.23d on a Debian Etch box. Its configured as a ADS member. wbinfo -u returns correct domain users wbinfo -g returns correct domain groups getent passwd returns all users. I.e #KIC\kicass:*:10049:10002:kic ass:/home/KIC/kicass:/bin/false getent group returns correctly. .I.e KIC\xcello:x:10016:KIC\mats Executing chown KIC\\kicass test.txt works. Executing chgrp

Hi, Any one still having problems with "valid users" on 3.0.23d? I'm working in "security = USER" mode and with local users only. Share configuration : [private] path = /home/private valid users = papo force user = root force group = root read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 First test, anonymous