similar to: CIDR prefix with a non-multiple of 8

Hello After seeking solutions and fixes to the problem I'm experiencing and not finding any, I turn here. If there is no solution, please don't be shy to pointing out that too :-) The problem: I have multiple IP-networks with windows clients in them. Some are 95, most are 98, some 2000 and xps. Most networks have at least one NT4.0 server in them, some have more, some have none. Each

Folks, I'm now looking at https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16274, which seems to have some support in the vectorizer, but not as we need for this particular case. I may have missed something obvious, please let me know if there is a better way. As you already know, ARM has two FP instruction sets: VFP and NEON. VFP applies to single FP registers while NEON is a full SIMD. The problem is

Author: kcpoon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: f244f36ccf8f500f22f5245345455c0fa68f4533 Log message: 6249405 CIDR support does not work for logical interface Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2035 --- Comment #16 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget uncompleted bugs from 6.1 => 6.2

Dear openssh-unix-dev list, in OpenSSH 5.1 you introduced CIDR address/masklen matching for "Match address" blocks in sshd_config as well as supporting CIDR matching in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys from="..." restrictions in sshd. I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would be quite

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994 Bug ID: 994 Summary: Named sets with type "ipv4_addr" do not allow adding CIDR elements Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at mva.name --- Comment #1 from Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- There are already kernel

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |admin at rollinix.net --- Comment #3 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- *** Bug 994

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tom at compton.nu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Pablo Neira Ayuso

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason.lee.campbell at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #5 from

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Damien Miller wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22:34AM +0200, Bert Courtin wrote: > > > I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented > > > for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would > > > be quite beneficially (at least for me, maybe

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2130 --- Comment #19 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to openssh-6.4 -- You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2188 --- Comment #21 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget incomplete bugs / feature requests

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2226 --- Comment #23 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to 6.7 release, since 6.6 was mostly

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2266 --- Comment #25 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget incomplete bugs to 6.8 release. --

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 --- Comment #27 from VP <vladimir at arobas.net> --- Ryan, have you looked at patching version 6? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2266 | --- Comment #28 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- OpenSSH 6.8 is approaching release and closed for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2360 --- Comment #29 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to 6.9 -- You are receiving this