similar to: Windows Clients unable to browse NTFS disk via samba

Hi there. OS version: FreeBSD 4.7-Stable FreeBSD #3 I just added a disk to my box and after playing with fdisk and disklabel with this configuration: fdisk: **************************************************************** g c16383 h16 s63 p 1 165 0 39102336 **************************************************************** disklabel

please reply to hdgbyi@public.guangzhou.gd.cn or bgpgong@hotmail.com, thank you. UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE By reanalysing the experiment of Heisenberg Gamma-Ray Microscope and one of ideal experiment from which uncertainty principle is derived , it is found that actually uncertainty principle can not be obtained from these two ideal experiments . And it is found that

please reply to hdgbyi@public.guangzhou.gd.cn or bcpgong@hotmail.com, thank you. UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE IS UNTENABLE By reanalysing the experiment of Heisenberg Gamma-Ray Microscope and one of ideal experiment from which uncertainty principle is derived , it is found that actually uncertainty principle can not be obtained from these two ideal experiments . And it is found that

My problem is there I download and archive my work to the freebsd server via samba. When I'm transfering files from the windows -> freebsd I will get anywhere between 20-100kB/s and from freebsd -> windows I will get a few mbps. I'm getting no where near a full 100mbps and both ethernet cards are set for 100mbps full duplex working great. I've tried increasing buffer sizes on

Hello. I am a relatively new FreeBSD user. I have samba, ssh and vnc server running on it. I am also trying to set up the IPFILTER on it. I used the handbook to familiarize myself with the software and the sample script provided in the chapter discussing ipf, I decided to use as a starting point. After reading the ipf chapter I assumed that if "block in log first quick on xl0 all" is

Dear list, A few days ago one of my machines were attacked by a DDoS-attack using UDP on random ports.. When I later on analyzed the logs, I found this in my dmesg: xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55) xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55) xl0: initialization of the rx ring failed (55) I tried to find out on google what it ment, but without any luck. What does that mean and

Referring to my previous post about degradation of voice quality when having more than 2 connection. The actual route is: pc xlite -> local asterisk box -> iaxtel -> local asterisk I have tried out a different situation: pc xlite -> local asterisk box -> iaxtel and the second connection pc xlite -> local asterisk box -> iaxtel -> local asterisk The same degradation

Dear all, I'm analysing a survey, and creating a barchart of the different responses for each question. The questions are grouped according to a number of categories, so I'm using lattice to create a plot with each question in a category on it. The problem is that the response set for different questions within the same category varies. I want to be able to draw only the relevant

I have just checked the Openbsd box on the if interface. fxp0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 address: 00:02:55:30:54:28 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::202:55ff:fe30:5428%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 xl0:

Hello, I'm having problems getting my samba setup to work at a little LAN i partially maintain. I've been reading quite a lot about what I could think of being related to my problems/setup, and I've also googled my ass off :( So here I am, resorting to you guys in hope of help =] Sorry to say, but I don't have much experience, and therefore I'm a bit lost at the moment. Not

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems, using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. I tried to establish the connection, but it has some problems which are explained below. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram]

Hi All, I need to establish an IPSec tunnel between two FreeBSD systems using IPv6 addresses.The connetcion is host-to-host between two FreeBSD( RELEASE 4.11) systems with KAME IPSec implementation. |----------------->| host1-[mohan]| |host2-[ram] |<-----------------| host1 IPv6 address : fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe6f:dfa0 host2 IPv6 address :

I have seen many references online to being able to use OCFS2 with Pacemaker, but the documentation I have been able to find is very Sparse. I have kernel 2.6.29, and the latest DLM and Pacemaker (using openais) and OCFS2-Tools from GIT. (As of June 13). I was able to build ocfs2_controld.pcmk ... (With some minor changes to the makefile for my install) I noticed the OCF version of o2cb is not

Hello, I have the following hardware configuration. Tyan 2466N motherboard, 1.03 BIOS, 2 Athlon-MP 1800+ CPUs, 512MB registered ECC DRAM, Onboard 3Com NIC (xl type) Radeon 8500 AGP video card Adaptec 3210S SCSI RAID controller Comtrol RocketPort 8 port PCI serial card I have started to experience some odd system lockups in the past couple months, and it seems to be getting worse. I particular,

Hi there. This is with regards to samba-3.0.23c, on FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p12 Previously I had Samba up and running without any problems. Then I decided to do a tiny upgrade by simply switching to a new motherboard, while keeping all other hardware and software aspects the same. However, after the upgrade, netbios name resolution seems to have stopped working somehow. \\servername lookups no

How do I tell LogCheck that I don't care what's in the rest of the search string? ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} m0n0wall ipmon\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9:]{8}\.[0-9]{6} xl0 (@ 0:3|@100:3) (b|p) 192\.168\.2\.[0-9]{1,3} -> [0-9.]{7,15} PR igmp len [0-9]{2} \([0-9]{2}+\) IN$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} m0n0wall ipmon\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9:]{8}\.[0-9]{6} xl0 (@ 0:3|@100:3) (b|p) 192\.168\.2\.[0-9]{1,3} -> [0-9.]{7,15} PR

I see that one of the to-do's is to add a SmartTee filter to avicap32.dll. I have a microscope camera that is based upon a webcam (that I cannot set the proper resolution under Linux- and haven't gotten help to do so). I have software and drivers that will work in VirtualBox, but there is a 5 second delay between moving a slide in the window and the move showing up in the software

-- Previously Posted to FreeBSD-questions Update: I've changed the RAM in the machine. That seemed to fix the problem for a little bit, but the problem has started occuring again. Also, I'm not subscribed to the list, so please reply to this message directly. Thanks for all your help. -- Hello, Recently, I've been having kernel panics on 4.8RC. This made me upgrade to

FreeBSD 4.1.1-RELEASE #1: Tue Oct 10 18:09:51 CDT 2000 root@test-drive.tamu.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/TEST-DRIVE Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (501.14-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x683 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383fbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CM

I am having problems in the implementation of a VPN, below made a project of my net: INTRANET (10.0.0.0/24) | 10.0.0.5 xl0 NetBSD IPNAT ( map wi0 10.0.0.0/24 -> 192.168.213.10 ) wi0 192.168.213.10/30 | | Wireless VPN | | 192.168.213.9/30 xl2 FreeBSD NATD ( divert natd all from any to any ) xl0 200.x.x.5/24 | 200.x.x.1/24