similar to: Can't Write to Samba Share

i had my file server setup with suse 10.1, and i did a clean upgrade to suse 10.2 (if it matters much), now trying to setup samba again, i have run into a slight problem. on my windows machines, i can access the home directories of the users, however when i try and get into directories i setup myself (in my case 'netshare'), it says that the directory is not accessible. check permissions

Hi, Since 1 month, I tried without any success to configure Samba. My problem is that winbind crashes when I list users and groups. And I think that it is linked to my trusted domains (wbinfo -domain=myADdomain -u works well). The error is the following : [2006/07/11 14:30:29, 3] libsmb/cliconnect.c:cli_session_setup_spnego(757) got principal=machine$@TRUSTEDDOMAIN.COM [2006/07/11

I have upgraded to version 3.0.27a on ubuntu 7.10 server and now the getent command wont display the active directory users, but wbinfo will. It worked fine with 3.0.26a and I have not changed my configuration. I do however have this in my winbind log: [2007/12/04 13:39:01, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:request_len_recv(544) request_len_recv: Invalid request size received: 2084 (expected

We had to power down all servers today for electrical maintenance in the building and for some reason I began having access problems related to the valid users lists when power was restored. The dialog from the 'Samba-3.0.23 broke my network' thread seemed as if it might be related even though I had not performed any software upgrade so I tried adding the group mappings as discussed in

Hi, I've just updated (using yum under fedora 5) to the latest version of samba and am now encountering a major problem with samba. Whenever I attempt to access shares (don't have printers or other such non disk shares) the access fails (after prompting for password, and performing some level of authentication, it notes if no password is entered that Anonymous login successful).

Hi there, I use FC5. I discovered, for an exemple, if you have a user group with 3 members (Alan, Baker, Clive), before 3.0.23c this line at smb.conf worked fine: valid users = @user But with 3.0.23c update it doesn't work anymore. You have to replace the line like this: valid users = Alan, Baker, Clive I mean, replace the "@groupname" with the complete userlist of the

All, After upgrading to samba 3.0.30 on gentoo amd64 because of my recent best friend CVE-2008-1105 My winbind daemon is 'hanging up', and refusing to respond to pings after a few minutes of activity. Wbinfo -u, getent passwd all work successfully, then after a bit wbinfo -p just tells me winbind dies. I have 3.0.30/winbind on another machine, also amd64 that is working.... So

Hi, I have a share that worked fine in samba 2.2.8a, users were able to read and write to the share, and edit files. After migrating to 3.0.23a, users are no longer able to edit existing files. Samba 2.2.8a config: [sales] comment = SALES path = /home/netshare/sales read list = @purch, @shipping write list = @adm, @mgt, @sales, @vag, +hap force group =

Hi folks, I am trying to access the shared folders on a Windows XP PC from a Linux (FC5) PC using smbclient. Linux config info: $ locale LANG=en_US.UTF-8 $ rpm -q samba samba-3.0.24-6.fc5 smb.conf: [global] dos charset = CP936 <--- Simplified Chinese unix charset = UTF-8 display charset = LOCALE Now, here is the problem:

Still having problems with my Samba configuration, even after upgrade to the latest FC5 samba package. Getting "Access Denied" errors when trying to connect with a member of the group "Domain Users" to the MP3s share. The W2K3 server shows that authentication was successful. I can't find any errors in the logs at all, and winbind appears to be working (I can su to the

Samba Developers-- I have a share called pub. In that share, there is a folder that I want to block access to. So, I chmoded it 0700 and chowned it root. In my smb.conf file, I set the "guest account" parameter to "netshare", an unprivialized user. I also set the "guest only" parameter to "yes" No remote computer can "cd" into the directory,

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You

I am looking for help install the x86_64 R Binary onto my FC5 machine. At the risk of subjecting myself to tons of criticism, I must confess that I don't know anything about Linux and I have never compiled R from source. Therefore, I choose FC5 because I see that a 64-bit binary is already available. Here is what I tried: I installed FC5 with all options (productivity, software development,

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network

Hello, I am a biostats student and a newbie to R. I have a question about 32-bit vs. 64-bit. I am running FC5 on a AMD 3800+ with 2GB Ram. With 64-bit, I am running into some issues the stability of FC5. A friend suggested I ditch the 64-bit version of FC5 for the 32-bit. I do not currently have any pressing needs for the capabilities of the 64-bit OS. Before I reinstall the 32-bit

Hi List; I think my problem in Zaptel compilation is related to autoconf: no input file, anyone has an advise? Also, I did a change in the Makefile existed in the following path: /usr/src/kernels/2.6.20-1.2319.fc5-i686/ EXTRAVERSION = 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5 Now, if I run uname -r then I get output: 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5 But the directory under the kernels is: 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5-i686 So do I have to

I have a fedora core 5 server running samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 from fedora updates. Recently I changed smb.conf to use security=domain instead of security=user. The server that it authenticates against is running fedora core 4 with samba-3.0.14a-2. Anyway, this setup worked just fine for a couple of weeks, but today I yum updated many packages including pam, glibc and kernel on the fedora 5

While trying to compile zaptel 1.2.8 on a FC5 I get the following error: /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build make -C /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5-smp-i686' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.o In file included from /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.c:40:

Seeing Fedora have released 1.5.0.3 for fc5 isn't it time for CentOS to rebuild 1.5.0.3 for CentOSPlus or does the current rpm have the patches? I recall last times goof in FC5 firefox appearing in the CentOS one so I assume that CentOSPlus needs to rebuild the FC5 one again. __________________________________________________ Improve the mailing list by performing a simple search before

Hello! It seems my struggle with Samba isn't quite over. My latest problem is exactly what you see above, followed by an attempt to core dump. This occurs upon authentication to the system. My system is part of a W2K3 domain. I looked at the Samba HOWTO, but apparently I have a system (FC5), that doesn't allow core dumps when the PID changes, since no core dumps are being created.