similar to: Getting "Specified network name is no longer available" on large (>100MB) files...

Hi all, As an experiment I'm trying to log into a samba server (3.3.2) from GDM. Both systems are running Ubuntu 9.04 and LDAP is not involved. But it's not working. The test user credentials are donkey/donkey . On the client: # net rpc join -S 192.168.0.1 -U root Enter root's password: Joined domain LAB-SAMBA. # wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded #

Hai, My advice would be get a cable tester. Or see if you can loan some cable to test, with what your saying im almost sure you have a bad cable/connector/ethernet port somewhere. And check if you synoligy supports gigabit networks and put in a gigabit swich. Then see if you wifi is still faster then you ethernet. If you model is a 1xx, what happens when you disable https? DSM version is?

Hi I have outgoing speed 128kbit and 5 users. So I want to cat outgoing traffic to 50kbit per user. The best Idea is make HTB queue 10kbit ceil 50kbit but one user (the Donkey one :) ) who using P2P take all the outgoing band. When I make HTB is trafic was very low Donkey doesn''t get any data or take only a little, outgoing traffic was about 1-2K, but In HTB trafic I have full outgoing

Mark Lehrer <mark@knm.org> writes: > What icecast version are you using? There was a bug prior to 1.3.11 > that caused this exact symptom. I am using 1.3.12+patch at the moment. That patch I have on it was the one I submitted earlier which fixes the problem with the wrong arguments passed to snprintf in the avl code. That shouldn't affect sound. I'm fairly certain it's a

Hi , I am sharing my FAT Shares over samba. When i copy small files (less than 100MB ) everything is fine. But when i copy large files( >200MB) my windows machine is getting busy for some time and i am getting error "Network name no longer available" but the file is getting copied properly. Regards Kumar

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 Joachim Schipper wrote: > What this patch does can be described as follows: > > Without: > you at local$ ssh somehost > Enter passphrase for RSA key 'foo': > you at somehost$ exit > $ ssh otherhost > Enter passphrase for RSA key 'foo': > you at otherhost$ > > With: > you at local$ ssh somehost > Enter passphrase for RSA

Andreas, A few thoughts regarding your system 1) If it's a home system and you're specifically concerned about mitigating CVE 2017-7494, (a) verify that your share isn't mounted 'noexec' - if it's mounted this way then you're safe (b) if not (a), then add the [global] parameter "nt pipe support = no". This will break functionality that relies on support for

I routinely write graphics into multi-page PDFs, but some graphics (i.e. plots of large spatial datasets using levelplot()) can result in enormous files. I'm curious if there is a better way. For example: #First, make some data: library(lattice) d=expand.grid(x=1:1000,y=1:1000) d$z=rnorm(nrow(d)) #Now, the PDF. The following produces a PDF that's ~50MB.

This is not directly a Rails question but you lot seem the best to ask... I have a strong feeling we will be developing future apps in Rails (Ruby fans are slowly starting to outnumber cynics in my office) so I want a web server plan that will be appropriate for that. We have just bought two new web servers I want to turn into a load-balanced, redundant pair. As well as any Rails

> -----Original Message----- > From: syslinux-bounces at zytor.com > [mailto:syslinux-bounces at zytor.com] On Behalf Of fabrice.maraval > Sent: Donnerstag, 18. M?rz 2004 08:38 > To: syslinux > Subject: [syslinux] (no subject) > > > Hi > I'm having a hard time in making a hard drive image which > will boot with memdisk. Any of my tries with disk creator

The problem is all my images over 10Mb will fail to load with memdisk.(test pc is a P4 2.4Ghz with 512Mb ram ) With Bochs, i'm using hard disk images and they're bootable in Bochs and well detected by memdisk but won't boot. I even tried to boot on some other support after a failling memdisk boot to see if there were the files i put in the hard disk image and they were here. If there

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: > Hi Micha, > > no, I have to this. I'm normally just check what smbstatus shows: > > 33837   BGC\pkoch    users        XXX (ipv4:XXX:51118)    SMB2_10 > > Bye the way - 45 MB/s is not so bad, I just wanted to know if it's > possible to get 90MB/s or at 10G a little bit more. >

Hi Micha, no, I have to this. I'm normally just check what smbstatus shows: 33837   BGC\pkoch    users        XXX (ipv4:XXX:51118)    SMB2_10 Bye the way - 45 MB/s is not so bad, I just wanted to know if it's possible to get 90MB/s or at 10G a little bit more. What has been messaured  ? I used on a new HPC node (10G) smbclient to test the transfer speed and get (10G<->10G)

Setup:  Server 2x10GB NIC, client 1x1GB: Using smbclient with -mSMB3 I get an average of 52000 KiloBytes/sec (before 45000), using NFS (v3) from the same server I get  108000 KiloBytes/sec an more (mount ; cp; umount; ...) Bye, Peer On 03.11.2017 17:01, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: >> Hi Micha, >>

On 2005-01-11 at 6:36:13 Darren Tucker said: > kochera at postfinance.ch wrote: > > We upgraded from 3.7.1p2 to 3.9p1. The behaviour of the X11 forwarding > > changed significantly, it is much slower. See below the truss output > > (server side which runs 3.7.1p2) an check for the timestamp (6 seconds > > delay). Do you have any idea what may causes this behaviour?

On 10/26/2015 10:28 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > All too often, my ssh session will freeze. > I'm fairly certain the problem is at my end. > None of the tilde commands work. > In particular, ~# and ~. are nonfunctional. > I can write to ssh's terminal window from another terminal window. > If I kill the ssh process, I can ssh in again. > The next time it happens,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592 Summary: Fingerprints for SSHD host key don't match (local ssh-keygen -l vs. ssh localhost) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd

Hi Just u/g to RH FC3 from RH8.0 which seemed to work fine with quotas. I have quotas for usernames set up as /home/domain/domainX/username/ for web space 50MB say 48MB used so 2MB free and /var/mail/spool/username for email. 100MB (60MB used so 40MB is available). /var/mail/username is symbolic linked via to spool/mail under /var dovecot seems to be using the quota for /home/.. and sees

i am using ipp2p module (v 0.6) from http://rnvs.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/ipp2p/index_en.html I have tried it on kazaa and e-donkey connections. Unfortunately, I am interesting in limiting kazaa traffic, which this modules seems not to work right with it. (Kazza traffic is not identified most of the cases....). Has anyone tried this kazza bandwidth control???

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:30:47AM -0400, Gene Cumm wrote: > 0) In case someone else has insight or searches later, I'd like to have > this on list. Some clients may work better with reply all. If you're not > on the list yet, I believe the posts by unsubscribed addresses are > moderated. Indeed, unsubscribed E-mail address wait for human approval before they go to all of