Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "'username = @group' not working correctly"
2014 Jun 02
3
[LLVMdev] -fvisibility=hidden, and typeinfo, and type-erasure
[Was initially posted on cfe-users, sorry.]
Hi,
I'm sorry my message is quite long, the TL;DR version is "g++ and clang++ seem to have different opinions on how RTTI, templates, and ELF visibility should interact".
I can't tell whether this is a bug or not: I have found no relevant documentation that could help me decide whether this behavior is meant, or not. All I can say
2005 Jul 28
2
test failed with acl patch
In the mandriva rpm of rsync, we apply for our rpm the acl patch in the
patches directory.
I am trying to update our rpm to rsync 2.6.6 but one of the test failed with
this patch. It seems to be a minor problem, but can you have a look ?
Thanks by advance.
Following the message (a bit long):
----- itemize log follows
Testing for symlinks using 'test -h'
+
2007 Apr 11
0
Fwd: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: noreply at rubyforge.org <noreply at rubyforge.org>
Date: 11-Apr-2007 15:31
Subject: [ mocha-Bugs-8687 ] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed
yielding methods.
To: noreply at rubyforge.org
Bugs item #8687, was opened at 2007-02-15 17:29
You can respond by visiting:
2024 Sep 21
1
model.matrix() may be misleading for "lme" models
Dear Prof. John Fox,
? Sat, 21 Sep 2024 12:47:49 -0400
John Fox <jfox at mcmaster.ca> ?????:
> NextMethod(formula(object), data=eval(object$call$data),
> contrasts.arg=object$contrasts)
The use of NextMethod worries me a bit. It will work as intended as
long as everyone gives fully-named arguments to the generic, without
relying on positional or partial
2008 Mar 02
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5297] New: merge test fails
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5297
Summary: merge test fails
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: SunOS
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us
QAContact:
2008 Apr 15
1
rsync-3.0.2 fails testsuite in itemize
HI,
rsync-3.0.2 with patches/acls.diff,patches/xattrs.diff,patches/slp.diff
fails (most of the time) in the itemize test:
----- itemize log follows
Testing for symlinks using 'test -h'
makepath /usr/src/packages/BUILD/rsync-3.0.2/testtmp/itemize/from/foo
makepath /usr/src/packages/BUILD/rsync-3.0.2/testtmp/itemize/from/bar/baz
cd+++++++++ ./
cd+++++++++ bar/
2004 Jan 14
1
-vn doesn't list empty directories, -v does
I'm using rsync-2.5.7-2 on an updated Fedora Core 1 athlon system.
The -vn option lists all files to be copied or deleted, including
symlinks, but it does not appear to list empty directories to be
copied, even tough it copies them. It does list empty directories to
be deleted. The -v option does list and copy empty directories. -v
should behave the same in both instances, and the desired
2001 Mar 09
0
Port forwarding problem with 2.5.1p2
Hi,
There appears to be a bug in 2.5.1p2 that is not present on 2.3.0p1.
The environment in question is Solaris, on either Intel or Sparc. The
arrangement is as follows:
System bar forwards a port from itself to system baz by doing
su portfw -c 'ssh -2 -P -N -f -g -L 3333:baz:22 baz'
System foo, which can talk to bar but not baz, initiates an ssh
connection to bar port 3333, and is
2009 Jul 26
1
Need help of exclusion options in rsync-3.0.6
Hi,
I have a situation where I want to delete some of my excluded patterns but
still want to preserve some other. For example consider below source and
destination directory hierarchy.
Source Dest
---------- ---------
/foo/bar/ /foo/bar/
| -> baz | -> baz
| -> xyz | -> xyz
| ->
2018 Mar 16
3
cat(fill=N)
Hi all,
I expect I'm getting something wrong, but
cat("foo bar baz foo bar baz foo bar baz", fill = 10)
should be broken into lines of width 10, whereas I get:
> cat("foo bar baz foo bar baz foo bar baz", fill = 10)
foo bar baz foo bar baz foo bar baz
This is on R 3.4.3, but I don't see mentions of it fixed in 3.4.4 or
r-devel NEWS.
Cheers,
David
2007 Feb 16
0
[#8687] Block''s return value is dropped on stubbed yielding methods.
Erik Hetzner has submitted a bug with a suggested patch...
> Best explained with an example:
>
> test:
>
> foo = mock()
> bar = mock().stubs(:get_baz).returns(:baz)
> foo.stubs(:with_something).yields(bar)
>
> real code:
>
> baz = foo.with_something do |bar|
> bar.get_baz.to_s
> end
>
> baz should now be "baz", but is nil because we have
2017 Jan 08
0
Re: IRC question about ?foo etc
On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 11:13:42PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> let other_func ~foo ~bar ?baz =
> func ~foo ~bar ?baz
Actually there is a third issue which is what makes this even
more confusing.
?baz (when calling a function) expects that baz (the binding) is an
option, and passes either nothing (if baz = None) or the optional
argument (if baz <> None). In effect it
2007 Dec 24
2
Build a cmdline for exec from optional parameters
How can I do this?:
foo { name:
$bar => "frob"
}
define foo( $bar = false, $baz = false ) {
if #$bar and $baz both defined
$cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar --baz=$baz ${name}"
else if #$bar defined
$cmd = "frobnicate --bar=$bar ${name}"
else if #$baz defined
$cmd = "frobnicate --baz=$baz ${name}"
else
2009 Jan 27
0
[LLVMdev] inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If yes then this doesnt look all that bad or invasive at first sight (if
>> the put_user() workaround can be expressed in a cleaner way), but in any
>> case it would be nice to hear an LLVM person's opinion about roughly when
>> this is going to be solved in LLVM itself.
>
> one thing that seems to be clear to everyone
2009 May 02
1
The --relative option on remote machine to source machine ???
Hi,
I read below lines in rsync v3.0.5 for --relative option.
if you used this command:
rsync -av /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/
... this would create a file named baz.c in /tmp/ on the remote machine. If
instead you used
rsync -avR /foo/bar/baz.c remote:/tmp/
then a file named /tmp/foo/bar/baz.c would be created on the remote machine,
preserving its full path
It is also possible to limit the
2012 Jun 19
0
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr
On Jun 18, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote:
>>> But this interface has become awkward to use. There are two "return" values. This method is a unique_ptr "source" but the use of a by-refernce parameter means you have to start with an uninitialized unique_ptr and the readFile() has to std::move() into it. unique_ptr is much nicer to use as a return value.
2019 Aug 03
1
segmentation fault in fs_list_get_path
Hi,
There seems to be a straightforward bug in
src/lib-storage/list/mailbox-list-fs.c:79. set->index_dir is unchecked
prior to dereferencing (unlike on line 126 in the same file, where it is
properly checked). This manifested on a FreeBSD server running dovecot
2.3.6 when clients tried to retrieve mail with subscriptions like
`~/bar/baz`. This caused the `imap` child to crash, e.g.
2011 Feb 25
0
Named capture in regexp
Dear R core developers,
One feature from Python that I have been wanting in R is the ability
to capture groups in regular expressions using names. Consider the
following example in R.
> notables <- c(" Ben Franklin and Jefferson Davis","\tMillard Fillmore")
> name.rex <- "(?<first>[A-Z][a-z]+) (?<last>[A-Z][a-z]+)"
> (parsed <-
2006 Sep 11
2
unexpected behaviour when defining a function
Hi,
I know S manuals used to warn against using the same names for a
variable and a function, but I have never seen that cause problems in
R, so I usually don't pay much attention to it. Which is why the
following behaviour came as a surprise:
> bar <- function() 1
> foo <- function(bar = bar()) {
+ bar
+ }
> foo(9)
[1] 9
> foo()
Error in foo() : recursive default
2005 Nov 13
0
Routing Fixnum
If I have the following route defined:
map.connect ''/foo/bar/:baz'',
:requirements => {:baz => /^\d+$/}
then if someone asks for /foo/bar/3 I noticed that :baz == "3" instead
of :baz == 3. I.E. it is a string not a number. (At least it does this
in the functional testing of the routing). This seems reasonable because
I have not told it to expect a number but