similar to: Samba too many handles

I realized that my choice of options for grep did not do a very good job of including the last error message before the INTERNAL ERROR. I've included it in this email. Sorry. create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. [2003/04/21 15:35:21, 0, pid=2798, effective(502, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(109) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many

I have read the BUGS.txt file, used 'testparm' (successfully), and run through all the steps in DIAGNOSIS.txt. I don't see any problems that those tools have identified. The BUGS.txt file indicated that INTERNAL ERROR was almost certainly the result of a bug. I'm hopeful I have sent you the information you need. Let me know if there is something more I need to send. What

I removed and reinstalled samba 3.0.3pre2-SuSE on a SuSE 9.0 server in a failed attempt to upgrade to 3.0.5 (there were many cryptic dependancy errors, after a day with google, i gave up) Everything seemed to work ok after the install (from suse rpms) but the logs are full of: [datetime,0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(111) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on

I'm having several printing problems. Server is RHEL 3, running samba-3.0.9-1.3E.2 and cups-1.1.17-13.3.22. Clients are Win2K and WinXP. First, we're seeing the "failure to remove print jobs from queue list display" problem that others have reported. The document count for each printer also doesn't match the number of jobs in the queue list. I understand that

I'm using samba Version 3.0.24-1.fc5 with cups 1.2.8. I've 23 printers installed and my clients are w2k and WinXP. This mornig i got in logs: [2007/05/23 10:35:16, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(111) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. After restart the samba service it works fine. # ulimit -n 1024 i don't find solution in samba

In a prior email, I reported seeing the following in a user log file > create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. > [2003/04/21 15:35:21, 0, pid=2798, effective(502, 501), real(0, 0)] > rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(109) > create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. > [2003/04/21 15:35:21, 0, pid=2798, effective(502, 501),

I wonder if there is any resolution to this problem. I'm encountering similar situation with the Nashuatec DSC338 and P7325 printers from Ricoh using RPCS drivers. After uploading those drivers and performing basic printing preferences configuration, the print server crashed and become inaccessible. Here is the error from samba.log: [2005/07/23 12:14:19, 0]

Hai, The change logs of the the latest builds. ( note, buster 4.12.2 is still running ) Sorry for the separeted mails.. !Note! After Buster 4.12 build is finished, raspbian next. Changes the latest builds. 4.10.15 changes . * Non-maintainer upload. * Build from samba.org sources * Security release, info: - CVE-2020-10700: Use-after-free in Samba AD DC LDAP Server with

Dear samba-Team, The bug reported in PR#12819 for AXI 4.1.5 persits also in samba 2.0.3. The Bug prevents the connecting of other users as root to any share. I have a workaround/fix tested on AIX 4.1.5 ,4.3.2 with gcc 2.8.1 here: Change samba-2.0.3/source/lib/util_sec.c funktion set_effective_uid like this: 155c155 < #elif defined(HAVE_SETREUID) --- > #elif defined(HAVE_SETREUID)

Dear samba-Team, There is a bug in Samba 2.0.3 and 2.0.4b with IBM AXI 4.x. The Bug prevents connecting of other users than root to any share. I have a workaround/fix tested on AIX 4.1.5 ,4.3.2 with gcc 2.8.1 here: Change samba-2.0.4b/source/lib/util_sec.c funktion set_effective_uid like this: 155c155 < #elif defined(HAVE_SETREUID) --- > #elif defined(HAVE_SETREUID) &&

Dear All, We have an access database running on a Samba share (Samba version 3.0.10-1.4E) with a gigabit connection to the network. The front end of the databases are on the client machines with linked tables stored in a separate mdb file on the linux server. For some reason the database runs very slowly when it is set up in this way. I tested copying a 10 MB file onto the samba share and it

Hi, I just install 2.2.2 in a Red Hat 7.2 with kernel 2.4.16 on ext 3 + lvm. The problem are the locks!!!!!! I've 5 users working in .dbf + cdx (foxpro) files with an 16 bits application. It accesses to the files via DAO 2.0. A lot of times in the days the users gets 'currently locked' messages when the application open the dbf's files with read only access! I desactivated the

On 11/28/2014 9:23 AM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote: > > Is there anything else that I could try, > or do I just have to stay on protocol NT1 > as long as we still use this old software? > > Klaus Try in [global] acl allow execute always=true -- Regards -------------------------------------- Gerald Drouillard Technology Architect Drouillard & Associates, Inc.

Hi, we do a nightly backup using rsync (v2.5.6 as server on RedHat 7.3 and rsync 2.5.5 on Windows 2000/Cygwin). The backup media connected to the Windows-Client is a VFAT-formatted Maxtor USB-Disk. Everytime I run rsync from the windows-client, the following error occurs: --- <snip> --- rsync.exe -avzr --compress --stats --delete --timeout=240 --modify-window=2 rsync@server::development

Our Samba file server has a share with an visual basic application, there are 8 XP clients working with this share. The problem is that connections are very slow when accessing mdb databases... we are using MS Access ODBC to connect to the database on the samba server. Is there any special tuning for make things better? Thanks for the posible answers... -- Javier Cano Flores

I have a file server running with Samba over Debian Sarge 3.1 R1. This File server store MDB and XLS files. Could anybody give me an optimal setup for my samba server (smb.conf). Actually, the performance is very poor. Thanks, Daniel Arjona Net Admin GENCO Distribution Systems http://www.genco.com/ 8740 Robert Fulton Dr Columbia, MD 21046 Ph: 410-872-0875 X12 Fax: 410-872-0877

Hi all I'm trying to use my Cobol aplication with Smba but i'm getting A LOT OF "OPEN" errors... lookslike system is (or isn't) looking files for read/write. Anybody had this problem? PS: this program isn't mine, it's just for my company made by third company.

I work for a company that has a program localy developed, and we were having a problem when we started storing the application on the samba shared drived mabye simular to what you are expereienceing. in ur smb.conf (usuly in /etc/samba/smb.conf) make sure on the shared drive in samba the oplocks are set (example below) ... <insert more smb.conf here> ;================= Clinic

Hi all, I am attempting to get Sage to support their software if the files are on Samba (Linux). They (like a lot of people I've heard) say "We don't support Linux, Goodbye." even when the client is on Win98/NT. We have been having trouble on a particular site, and they refuse to support Sage Line 50 if the files are on Linux which is absurd, because Linux is much more

Hi fans, i tryed to use samba to share a paradox database which comes with a special trade programs. On a novell server it works fine. But on the samba share I get a corrupted database after some minutes of multi user access. I've tryed some entries in the smb.conf and I think a have a very conservative setting now. I heared of somebody who uses samba successfully with the same application