similar to: Fedora packages or Enterprise packages of Samba on RH EL4?

Hello List, In regards to RPM packages, what is the difference in the prebuilt ones for example the FC5 RPM's directly from samba.org or obtaining the latest .tar.gz and running ./makerpms.sh for the desired distribution. Does this way optimize for example - x86-64 or SMP ? Cheers, Adrian Sender. -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent:

Hello, Can somebody of the Samba team explain me the difference of Fedora packages or Enterprise packages ( <http://enterprisesamba.com/> http://enterprisesamba.com/) of Samba on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4? I tried to find any information about this subject, but googleing doesn't help me. The standard Samba package (3.0.10EL) of RHEL4 doesn't communicate with a W2k3 server

We make use of NT4 policies on our Samba domain. NTconfig.POL needs to be in \\domaincontroller\netlogon. I don't believe that you can use Active Directory GPOs (group policy objects) with a Samba domain. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660

The thing is, on the same machine, same net same moment, when I load the same folder from windows XP (through parallels) it takes like 10sec while samba 10min!!! MTU is 1500, set to match 100T devices like router and NAS on the LAN. Even on crossover cable it freaks out the same way. Btw my NAS is a Lacie Ethernet drive with linux based firmware and samba. Funny enough I load folders (ie

I am trying to Migrate one of our three Windows NT domains to Samba/LDAP using CentOS 4.3 (up to date via 'yum update'), Samba 3.0.10-1.4E.6.2, OpenLDAP: slapd 2.2.13 uname -a Linux sambatest.sal.ksu.edu 2.6.9-11.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jun 8 16:59:12 CDT 2005 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ---------------- I have followed the instructions in Chapter 9 of "Samba-3 by Example",

Due to a up-tick in the amount of SPAM my account has been receiving, I googled my e-mail address, and discovered that my e-mail address, along with the e-mail addresses of many subscribers to the SAMBA mailing list (samba at lists.samba.org) are being published in a harvestable form on your website. Specifically, this page: http://omgili.com/usrmgr.exe-, although there may be more instances.

Some default setting have changed. Use: testparm -v from your various versions of samba to detect which parameters may be causing you issues. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660 "Don't Blend in..."

This is a repost with some new information: Our log.nmb file fills up very quickly with the following pattern of messages: [2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP 129.130.10.24 [2000/06/22 11:58:25, 0]

"net rpc vampire ..." does NOT set the SAM or SECURITY hives of the registry to "readable", which is what renders the PDC non-operable. "net rpc vampire ..." is safe to use as many times as it takes to get comfortable with the process. I did it my self when I was converting our "labs" NT4 domain to Samba. --

We recently ran into a similar issue. If you have any microsoft "Live" components installed on your 7 box, samba servers must be contacted by numeric IP address rather than netbios (or even IP mnemonic) name. http://www.sevenforums.com/network-sharing/8303-cant-connect-samba-share-via -name-ip-works.html ---------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network

When I upgrade a major revision (3.4.x -> 3.5.x ), I always get a listing from "testparm -v" before and after the upgrade to make sure that a parameter (that I didn't specify in the config) didn't change it's default setting. ---------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660

It looks to me like you have "ldap user suffix" and "ldap machine suffix" defined twice. testparm should tell you which of these definitions samba is using. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660 "Don't Blend in..."

Hello everybody, we're trying to set-up Samba to share directories with Win users from some Linux servers. We've set up kerberos, gotten a ticket, joined the server to the domain, we get correct users/groups from "wbinfo" and "getent". The problem lies in "id": it does not update its user<->group mappings when they change on AD, even if

Have you checked the network end of things? This is the same type of thing I see when the NIC and ethernet switch don't autonegotiate to the same settings. Hope I didn't step on anybody's toes here. I'm new to the list. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and

Device manufacturer: Fideltronik INIGO Device name: Viper 1200 Device type: UPS Bus type: USB WWW: http://fideltronikinigo.com/viper/viper-1200/ " nut-scanner -U" output: [nutdev1] driver = "blazer_usb" port = "auto" vendorid = "0001" productid = "0000" product = "MEC0003" vendor =

Glad to hear that you succeeded in getting Samba installed. Next steps to getting it to work are: 1) edit your /etc/samba/smb.conf file to fit the needs of your network. 2) use "testparm" (without the quotes) to verify that your smb.conf file is correct. 3) start your samba services with: service smb start service winbind start (if you need winbind) 4) connect to a samba share with

Hi, I''d like to use psad from www.cipherdyne.com that analyze iptables log messages on my firewall-shorewall. It complains to incorrectly configured iptables when starting. This is the message : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The INPUT chain in the iptables ruleset on debian4 includes a default LOG rule for all

Our log.nmb file fills up very quickly with the following pattern of messages: [2000/06/19 05:10:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 129.130.10.136 for name NT.CIS.KSU.EDU<1d>. This response was from IP 129.130.10.24 [2000/06/19 05:10:59, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(93)

stock samba 3.0.21a works just fine, I generated an rpm from samba source, and everything works just fine! the enterprisesamba packages are what is broken. -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces+bsmoke=lapo.state.ar.us@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+bsmoke=lapo.state.ar.us@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Barry Smoke Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:38 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org

and you didnt find my scripts ;-) https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ The wheezy scripts should work also on ubuntu. It all in there what you want to know. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bob at donelsontrophy.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Donelson Trophy >Verzonden: zondag 7 december 2014 16:41 >Aan: SAMBA MailList