similar to: any plans on getting psexec / cmdat equivalent to Samba?

Windows admins can make their work easier with a tool like psexec. It allows to execute commands remotely, without the need to install anything on the target machine. All that is needed is username/password of course. Unfortunately, psexec command only runs on Windows. The usage is as follows (we start notepad interactively with -i to show that something happens): psexec \\192.168.1.2 -i -u

Hello! I don`t know if there is a port of psexec for unix yet (haven`t followed the list for some time) - but since it has been discussed on this list several times and i didn`t find any news about the current state of the "psexec unix port"- i`d like to tell that i found a psexec equivalent by chance - WITH SOURCECODE INCLUDED ! :) take a look at

Henrik Zagerholm wrote: > It sure could be :) > > I know that Jerry (Carter) of the samba team was looking at this a > while ago (psexec) but I guess he's been busy with the Samba4 TP. > Samba TNG has a command called cmdat which will let you schedule > commands on a win box using the at command. > www.samba-tng.org > By using the /now parameter you can execute

On 13 Mar 99, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton had this to say about about cmdat utility...: > this small utility can be used to run an arbitrary program by clicking > right-mouse-button on a directory. the default action is to run "ssh.exe" > on a Samba server and a command prompt "cmd.exe" on an NT server. Excuse me for being ignorant, but what is ssh.exe? A win32

I was wondering if there is a pstools / psexec (tools by Sysinternals) equivalent, which could be run on Linux machine to execute a process on a remote Windows machine?

I have two problems where I've come up with some code that will do the analysis that I want, but it looks pretty clumsy. In the first case, I calculate the variance on five different columns for each of 14 clusters and get them into one matrix. I get the job done, but I would have thought that it could be done in one or two lines, not six, and be generalized so that it didn't matter how

> I am not a regular samba developer, but I wanted to have psexec > equivalent, so I wrote it, it works but still need some development. > I do not know if patches of such sizes (about 30k) are welcome on > this list so I've put it on web page, with some description: > http://eol.ovh.org/winexe/ > Comments welcome. Hi, this is really great, you can get Windows command

psexec util (from sysinternals) is a tool which allows to execute commands on a remote Windows machine. A command like that: psexec.exe \\192.168.1.147 -u Administrator -p password C:\test.bat would run C:\test.bat as administrator on a Windows workstation with IP address 192.168.1.147. Quite cool, you don't have to install anything additional (like SSH server) on Windows, and you can

hi, is there a possibility to start a windows program remotely from linux via samba share? thanks, michael

Hi, I've got a simple PHP script which is using psexec from sysinternals to execute commands on a remote machine (which uses SMB under the hood). If I run it from DOS it works fine. If I run the same script via apache it hangs. Fired up Wireshark and had a look at what was going on. In the working version the treeconnect calls go to the IPC$ and then the ADMIN$ accounts on the remote machine.

Is there an equivalent solution for NET ADMIN / RCMD / PSEXEC within Samba allowing Samba servers to start / run programs on Windows clients? Maybe it is one of the RPC or RAP commands? -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly.

I notice when issuing the command "net rpc user testuser -S ip_address -U administrator%password" that the testuser gets added to the remote machine (Win 2k3) sucessfully, however the account is disabled. After adding the user remotely it requires that the administrator log into the remote machine "ip_address" to enable the newly created account. Is there a way to add a user

Hi Rowland, >> File server config looks exactly like this, except more shares, all >> with same simple config. I know that "use defualt domain" isn't >> necessery, but it's not the issue for me right now. ... > 'SYSTEM' is a Windows group and is meaningless to Unix, it should be > mapped to a Unix ID only on a Samba AD DC and there it is an >

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

Hi, On our sernet-samba 4.2.4 AD-style we see that for some (newer) machine accounts, they do not have a gidNumber and uidNumber. Users logging on to those machines experience no problems, but in those systems eventlog we see during boot:: This computer was not able to set up a secure session with a domain controller in domain OURDOMAIN due to the following: There are currently no logon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Does anyone have a good suggestion for patching XP clients on a Samba PDC domain? I've tried using autoit and sysinternal's psexec to write a script to do this but this doesn't work well because the computer has to be active and our machines lock the machine if it's not active in 15 minutes. I hate having to log onto every

I am trying to run Mongrel 1.1.5 with mongrel_service 0.3.4 on Ruby 1.8.6 with a "normal" user account, i.e. a user which belongs only to the Windows group "Users". The rationale behind this is that running a web server with full administrative rights (e.g. Local System) is not something that I would like to do. Unfortunately, starting the service from the services control

[ I've just asked abut that, here, but now seems a simpler things, so i retry... ] This seems NON a samba touble, but a different behaviour in M$ client OS. But, really, i've not clue how to find an answer... Suppose to have a Win7 and a Win10 machine, both NOT joined to a domain. Suppose to have a share, with guest access enabled, where only readonly access are needed. Suppose also

Each driver calling scsi_ioctl() gets an equivalent compat_ioctl() handler that implements the same commands by calling scsi_compat_ioctl(). The scsi_cmd_ioctl() and scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl() functions are compatible at this point, so any driver that calls those can do so for both native and compat mode, with the argument passed through compat_ptr(). With this, we can remove the entries from

Each driver calling scsi_ioctl() gets an equivalent compat_ioctl() handler that implements the same commands by calling scsi_compat_ioctl(). The scsi_cmd_ioctl() and scsi_cmd_blk_ioctl() functions are compatible at this point, so any driver that calls those can do so for both native and compat mode, with the argument passed through compat_ptr(). With this, we can remove the entries from