similar to: 3.0.23rc1 - Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_NOTIFY handler

Thomas Bork wrote: > [2006/05/25 15:25:42, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(247) > Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler Switched back to 3.0.21c. Ouch, access to shares is not granted anymore :( The client is confused and thinks the samba server is an domain controller!: Auf \\Deveis\public kann nicht zugegriffen werden. Sie haben eventuell keine Berechtigung,

This is part of the log and strace output from samba 3.0.9 running on kernel 2.4.27. The output from samba 3.0.8 on kernel 2.6.9 looked somewhat similar... I haven't seen much on the list or ancilliary documentation recently, other than "it is fixed for samba > 3.0"... Could someone please shed some light on this? Syslog entries: Nov 22 22:25:48 toshiba smbd[32209]:

I have a samba problem on a redhat 9 box that appears to be clearly linked to a new kernel 2.4.22nptl when using "kernel oplocks = yes". I am trying to install a printer driver on a win98se box that tries loading the driver files from a share on the 2.2.8a server. The installation fails as win98se cannot read all the files as it would like to. I have two things I can do to avoid the

RH9.0 / samba-2.2.7a-8.9.0 / Linux pegasus.houtsma.net 2.4.20-9 #1 Wed Apr 2 13:42:50 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux The syslog shows the following messages: [2003/04/13 04:02:36, 0] smbd/server.c:open_sockets(238) Got SIGHUP [2003/04/13 16:13:52, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287) Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler [2003/04/13 23:14:06, 0]

hi, my smbd.log file is full of such messages: ----------------------------- [2003/05/09 09:35:42, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287) Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler [2003/05/09 09:37:27, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287) Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler ----------------------------- on redhat9 with kernel-2.4.20-9 and

I'm running Slackware 9.0 with a vanilla Linux kernel 2.4.25. Due to the announced EOL for 2.2.x, I'm trying to migrate our Samba hosts to version 3.0.5. These Samba hosts serve shares mounted off a seperate NFS fileserver. All is going well, except I've started getting the following messages in the smbd logs: ---- Start of snippet ---- [2004/08/11 09:59:30, 0]

I've upgraded my system at Samba 3.0.20 (SLES 8) bacause of some errors on winbind and Windows 2003. Now, usrmgr.exe doesn't work anymore. It reports: ?procedure number is out of range - Do you want to administrate another domain?? USRMGR has been working for 3 years; I've made all upgrades on Windows 2000, but the results it's the same. Any Idea? uz.

I'm upgrading to a RH 9 box and using the version of Samba that comes with RH 9. I notice this error message in the smbd.log file; [2003/11/21 21:15:19, 0] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_init_kernel_oplocks(287) Failed to setup RT_SIGNAL_LEASE handler It seems to effect the "domain admin group" parameter. In previous version of RH (7.3) and Samba (2.2.7-3.7.3), I'm able to

I'm using 3.0.24 with patches from http://us4.samba.org/samba/patches/. On my XP client the print services for Unix are installed, I shared the local printer named 'jet' on the XP client to all users and the connecting user is an existing user on linux (system and samba user) and XP. I cannot execute the dir command in smbclient for this printer: deveis # smbclient -Utb%password

Hello Folks, I want to install new version of samba but have already old version of samba which came with Linux 8.0. Please advise, I want to install new version of samba ... How would I un-install old version which came with Linux8.0 ? Do i really need to do so, in order to install new version of samba ? Do i reallly need to remove any files or pkgs before i install new version ? which ?

Hi @all, does anybody know, where privileges are stored? deveis # net rpc rights list 'Domain Power Users' -U root%password SeMachineAccountPrivilege SeBackupPrivilege SeRestorePrivilege SePrintOperatorPrivilege SeDiskOperatorPrivilege But: deveis # ls -l /var/lock/samba/*.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 8192 Nov 13 20:14 /var/lock/samba/account_policy.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 696 Nov

Hi all, I just downloaded the most recent 2.2.0alpha2 from samba.org and am trying to compile it on a Sun Ultra 5 running Solaris 8. I'm getting the following error when smbd is being linked: Compiling smbd/noquotas.c Compiling smbd/oplock.c Compiling smbd/oplock_irix.c Compiling smbd/oplock_linux.c Compiling smbd/notify.c Compiling smbd/notify_hash.c Compiling smbd/notify_kernel.c Linking

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 =============================================================== Happy Birthday, Deryck. =============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that production Samba servers should be running for all

Hello all, I'm running slackware linux 8.0 and tries to configure samba 2.2.8a as PDC. I succeded configuring network shares i.e. netlogon, profiles, etc. Everything is OK, but when i tries to make a domain logon using windows 98 apears an error "Wrong parameter". When i tries to join my samba domain under Windows 2000 it says "domain does not exists ....". what am i

Robert Dal Santo wrote: > Is there any work underway to get Samba to support OPLOCKS? I know > they are difficult to implement but I'm faced with a decisions now to buy an > NT box (Ugh!) or do a lot of messing around to get this application > to perform decently. The application in questions takes around 5 > hours to do a taks without OPLOCKS and around an hour to do the

Hi My server has ran out of file descriptors(FDs) a few times since 2.2.5 up to 2.2.6. When looked into the problem I found a lot of smbd processes that had hundreds of open FDs. I am on RH 7.2. Any ideas? I have compiled the sources form SAMBA_2_2 CVS branch from yesterday. usally I just specify the --prefix= parameter to configure before I do make clean;make; make install I also noticed

Okay, we're doing a bit of system revamping at my work since our last file server crashed and burned in a horrible tragic failure (hard disk died). Anyways, we've stepped it up a notch with some nice hardware and the fileserver will be running linux (Redhat 9.0 currently). Anyways, I'm currently running into an issue. (I'm using samba 2.2.7a-8.9.0 for reference). Anyways,

I'm trying to setup a printer using Cups, using cupsaddsmb It uploads the files ok (smbclient ... -c 'mkdir W32X86;put ...;put ...') It adds the driver ok (rpcclient -c 'adddriver "Windows NT X86" "Canon:file1:file2..." (I have verified this worked from server properties in "printers and faxes" of the linux server: the driver "canon" shows

Hello, I am running samba 2.2.7a on Red Hat 9. The clients are running Win2k with SP3 and Office XP with SP2. The Samba server authenticates with a WinNT 4 domain controller. When the users open a Word or Excel document there is a 30sec delay before the file opens. From info gleaned from searches on this subject I have tried turning oplocks off altogether, which resulted in Word and Excel

Hi, anybody knows, what the last entry in this log mean?: [2004/11/07 16:51:50, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3777) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = ./Neu Textdatei.txt, newname = ./???.txt, last_component_dest = ???.txt, is_8_3 = 0 [2004/11/07 16:51:50, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(./Neu Textdatei.txt) returning