similar to: is there a possibility to start a programm from samba on a windows machine?]

Hello ! If anybody want`s to implement the psexec unix port or samba equivalent, maybe taking a look at xCmd from Zoltan Csizmadia at http://www.codeguru.com/Cpp/I-N/network/remoteinvocation/article.php/c5433/ may help a LOT and is a very good example. (This one seems to work similar like psexec - but it is available with sourcecode!) I don`t know if the author is still reachable via this

Windows admins can make their work easier with a tool like psexec. It allows to execute commands remotely, without the need to install anything on the target machine. All that is needed is username/password of course. Unfortunately, psexec command only runs on Windows. The usage is as follows (we start notepad interactively with -i to show that something happens): psexec \\192.168.1.2 -i -u

hi, is there a possibility to start a windows program remotely from linux via samba share? thanks, michael

> I am not a regular samba developer, but I wanted to have psexec > equivalent, so I wrote it, it works but still need some development. > I do not know if patches of such sizes (about 30k) are welcome on > this list so I've put it on web page, with some description: > http://eol.ovh.org/winexe/ > Comments welcome. Hi, this is really great, you can get Windows command

I notice when issuing the command "net rpc user testuser -S ip_address -U administrator%password" that the testuser gets added to the remote machine (Win 2k3) sucessfully, however the account is disabled. After adding the user remotely it requires that the administrator log into the remote machine "ip_address" to enable the newly created account. Is there a way to add a user

Hello! I don`t know if there is a port of psexec for unix yet (haven`t followed the list for some time) - but since it has been discussed on this list several times and i didn`t find any news about the current state of the "psexec unix port"- i`d like to tell that i found a psexec equivalent by chance - WITH SOURCECODE INCLUDED ! :) take a look at

I was wondering if there is a pstools / psexec (tools by Sysinternals) equivalent, which could be run on Linux machine to execute a process on a remote Windows machine?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Does anyone have a good suggestion for patching XP clients on a Samba PDC domain? I've tried using autoit and sysinternal's psexec to write a script to do this but this doesn't work well because the computer has to be active and our machines lock the machine if it's not active in 15 minutes. I hate having to log onto every

psexec util (from sysinternals) is a tool which allows to execute commands on a remote Windows machine. A command like that: psexec.exe \\192.168.1.147 -u Administrator -p password C:\test.bat would run C:\test.bat as administrator on a Windows workstation with IP address 192.168.1.147. Quite cool, you don't have to install anything additional (like SSH server) on Windows, and you can

update: - fixed smbd for win95-style profile-locating (it now works, thank you to everyone who sent in log files to get this fixed) - various modes tested and confirmed as working: * ROLE_STANDALONE security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain master = no domain logons = no * ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain master = yes

On 13 Mar 99, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton had this to say about about cmdat utility...: > this small utility can be used to run an arbitrary program by clicking > right-mouse-button on a directory. the default action is to run "ssh.exe" > on a Samba server and a command prompt "cmd.exe" on an NT server. Excuse me for being ignorant, but what is ssh.exe? A win32

Dear all, This is an embedded firmware engineer Honey from China, and I am studying the samba and samba-tng, because the size of samba is too large to my development. I want to port the samba-tng to embedded ARM Linux system, use the kernel version is 2.6.35, but I found the samba-tng can't be compiled by cross compiler(arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc). And I can't

Hi, I posted this problem before in more detail (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba&m=104756899022766&w=2) but received no response. At the current state of Smaba 3.0 and Samba-TNG these two seem to be incomaptible. Samba 3.0 can't join a TNG controlled domain. I think this should affect a lot of installations as TNG as a controller and "stable" as file/printserver seem

OK: First, please respond to me directly, as I'm not on the TNG list. Here's the situation: I will be setting up a "computer lab" for 30-40 PC's with various users (students). Here are my needs: 1) One Touch (point) User administration (the simpler the better) 2) Simplest set of LINUX SW possible 3) NO NT PDC 4) All clients are W2K. 5) Want

Just search online why in general that is insecure via CLI vs programmatic for first class automation.. there is a reason why snmp, rest, ... exist. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > You've mentioned security issues in your previous email, but now you're > hopping to management issues. > > Have you tried Ansible, Chef or

Hello, We recently undertook to migrate our domain from samba-TNG to samba-2.2.2. However, it did not go smoothly. One of the main reasons is that even if you start 2.2.2 with the domain SID from the TNG installation, you find that the users' RIDs are different. This is because samba-TNG calculates the RID from the unix UID using the formula UID*4 + 1000 where as 2.2.2 uses UID*2 +1000. At

Dear list I haven't been able to track down the cause of the following problems and hope someone can shed some light... We have been running samba-tng successfully on our school FreeBSD 4.5RELENG server for 18 months or so, but now need the facility of downloadable printer drivers for our W2k clients. I have installed samba 2.2.7a alongside our running samba-tng (2.6.1cvs) in a dual head

Would like to know if it is possible to switch to the latest production release of samba (2.2.3a) from samba-tng 2.6alpha and maintain the same configuration, password, mapping files, security identifiers, etc as tng. If not how would I convert my setup from tng to main with minimal effort? thank you __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Got something to say? Say

Hello, I've got a potentially major problem: I've recently changed from samba-TNG (vintage last February) which was working tolerably well in our environment barring a few locking problems and the ever increasing tdb files and memory footprint. As our number of clients has passed 150, the amount of memory used on our Solaris server became unsustainable and I took the decision to migrate

There is a reason most NMS systems used SNMP in the past and REST apis past 7+ years. They don't use CLIs except toy Expect type scripts.. Not just security but better error handling and more. Good luck learning! On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > SNMP is mainly used for monitoring, not _server_ automation. > > Also, it's