similar to: horrifying slow samba.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "horrifying slow samba."

2006 Feb 16
4
authenticate a share access to win2k3 server
Hi, I have a samba server sharing some stuff. Now i want to enable access to some share only to SOME users on the domain. this is the smb.conf : [global] netbios name = DATASVR server string = DATASVR socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384 idmap uid = 10000-20000 idmap gid = 10000-20000 winbind enum users = yes
2006 Mar 07
0
connecting to samba from 2003 sbs domain client runningxpprofi
Nobody any idea on where to start looking for this ?? Thanks -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-bounces+martijn=gova.info@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+martijn=gova.info@lists.samba.org] Namens Martijn Hazenberg Verzonden: maandag 6 maart 2006 14:57 Aan: samba@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: RE: [Samba] connecting to samba from 2003 sbs domain client runningxpprofi Hi, Addition to
2006 Mar 06
0
connecting to samba from 2003 sbs domain client running xpprofi
Hi, Addition to my message below.. Computers which doesnt login to the domain controller at startup like windows xp home ed. , dont seem to have this effect. It seems that you have to keep the connection up and running on the xp profi pc's to stop this problem from happening. ??? Regards, Martijn -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-bounces+martijn=gova.info@lists.samba.org
2006 Feb 20
0
samba domain problems
Hi All, Im still trying to authenticate some of the samba shares to a win2003 sbs server. I succesfully added the samba pc to the domain. Shares with no VALID USER key are accessible from all pc's. Now ive made a share which should ask for a username and password. [share] path = /raid/map writable = yes read only = no valid users = (domainuser_1,
2006 Mar 06
0
connecting to samba from 2003 sbs domain client running xp profi
Hi everybody, I have a network which consists of a linux data server, running Samba, a windows 2003 sbs, and a few xp professional clients which login to the domain server (2003 sbs). On the linux box, samba is running, this pc is always on. When i start the client pc (xp profi) and login to the domain, i can access the samba shares at full speed. Now the problem: When the xp profi client is
2020 Oct 10
10
Mail samba
Hi I am trying to authenticate my mail server with samba ad. The only problem is that I don?t get it working. root at dna:/data/CA/EasyRSA-v3.0.6# ldapsearch -x -h gaia.rompen.lokaal -D 'vmail' -W -b 'cn=users,dc=rompen,dc=lokaal' Enter LDAP Password: ldap_bind: Strong(er) authentication required (8) additional info: BindSimple: Transport encryption required. I can not read
2002 Mar 13
1
What group is CPB\unix_group.2147483404?
Hi, What's does a group like 'CPB\unix_group.2147483404' mean? I get al sorts of group when I run the following kix-script that are recognizable and some that are not. Why? running samba-2.2.3a with domainname CPB. ================ groups.kix ====================== $index = 0 DO $group = ENUMGROUP($index) ? $group $index = $index + 1 UNTIL Len($group) = 0
2009 Jul 14
1
Error when sampling from SpatialLines
Dear forum,   I am working in R 2.9.1 and I am trying to sample locations from a network file. Reading in nor plotting is a problem, however when I am trying to sample from the file I get the following message:   nwlim<-readShapeLines("C:/Limburg_nwshape", proj4string=CRS("+init=epsg:31300")) plot(nwlim)   randacc<-spsample(nwlim,n=1000,"random")
2020 Oct 10
0
Mail samba
On 10/10/2020 14:20, Philip Offermans wrote: > I have 2 samba servers. A domain controller, and a domain member. > > Domain controller(GAIA): > > /etc/hosts > 127.0.0.1 ? ? ? localhost > 192.168.88.2? ? gaia.rompen.lokaal gaia > ::1 ? ? ? ? ? ? localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback > ff02::1 ? ? ? ? ip6-allnodes > ff02::2 ? ? ? ? ip6-allrouters > > 127.0.1.1 ? ?
2020 Nov 08
1
Mail
Hi I have a mail server linked to my samba domain with kerberos. Everything works except for dovecot to write mails to the email directory. (Using acl) Here are the logs: Nov 08 13:46:50 lda(philip)<3253><aWYTMbrop1+1DAAAX2PAbw>: Error: stat(/data/vmail/philip/tmp) failed: Permission denied (euid=1001(philip) egid=1001(philip) missing +x perm: /data/vmail, we're not in group
2005 Jun 17
1
[Q] Is this true and does it mean there is dynamic defragmentation in ext2/3?
Someone recently posted the following statement midway down the page at http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-305871-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-ext3+ordered+data-start-25.html >You don't need to defragment ext2/ext3 because as you use the >filesystem file blocks and inodes are moved around and reallocated >to keep the data nearly contiguous. It's not perfect, but it
2020 Oct 10
0
Mail samba
On 10/10/2020 13:15, Philip Offermans wrote: > root at dna:/data/wordpress/database# ldapsearch -h gaia.rompen.lokaal -U > 'vmail' -W -b 'cn=users,dc=rompen,dc=lokaal' > Enter LDAP Password: > SASL/NTLM authentication started > ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Invalid credentials (49) > additional info: 8009030C: LdapErr: DSID-0C0904DC, comment: >
2020 Oct 10
0
Mail samba
On 10/10/2020 13:32, Philip Offermans wrote: > root at dna:/data/wordpress/database/html# dpkg -s libpam-krb5 > Package: libpam-krb5 > Status: install ok installed > Priority: optional > Section: admin > Installed-Size: 150 > Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com > <mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>> >
2020 Oct 10
0
Mail samba
On 10/10/2020 14:40, Philip Offermans wrote: > >>> >>> >>> >>> (The ip6 addresses are from docker) >> 'docker' ??? > https://www.docker.com?would recommend to check it out some time No, I should have expanded on that, what I meant was, is one or other of the DC or Unix domain member running in a docker container ? > > >> On 10
2005 Mar 29
7
Sipura 3000 FXO with Asterisk
Anybody using a Sipura 3000 for FXO with Asterisk? Mine is working except for one small nit... When a call comes in from the PSTN, the Sipura answers it and then passes it on to Asterisk, which plays extension ring tone. I'd prefer for the POTS line to stay on-hook while the extension rings, and to only be answered by the Sipura when the extension answers. Has anybody made this work?
2006 Mar 23
1
spam filtering with amavis
I'm filtering that is being deliverd to postfix mail server with amavisd-new . I want spam with spam f level 1 - 8 to ad a tag any everything above to be delete is this posebol? If yes how? Met vriendelijk groet, Bas van Dikkenberg GISkit bv BFVD1-RIPE Tel: +3130-6340430 Fax: +3130-6342433 Prive Tel: +3130-6372769 Mob:
2009 Apr 13
2
[LLVMdev] Depth First Sort of Machine Basic Blocks just before emitting code
That looks like it does a preorder depth first traversal (I think). I'm looking for postorder. Is there a trivial transform between the two? (I don't know one.) Am I wrong about the preorder/postorder? If not, anything lurking for postorder traversal? Thanks, Dan On Apr 13, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Apr 13, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Daniel M Gessel wrote:
2009 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] Depth First Sort of Machine Basic Blocks just before emitting code
po_iterator (ADT/PostOrderIterator.h) ? On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Daniel M Gessel <gessel at apple.com> wrote: > That looks like it does a preorder depth first traversal (I think). > I'm looking for postorder. Is there a trivial transform between the > two? (I don't know one.) > > Am I wrong about the preorder/postorder? If not, anything lurking for >
2009 Apr 14
1
[LLVMdev] Depth First Sort of Machine Basic Blocks just before emitting code
Too obvious! Thanks Dan On Apr 13, 2009, at 7:58 PM, John Mosby wrote: > po_iterator (ADT/PostOrderIterator.h) ? > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Daniel M Gessel <gessel at apple.com> > wrote: > That looks like it does a preorder depth first traversal (I think). > I'm looking for postorder. Is there a trivial transform between the > two? (I don't know
2010 Nov 24
0
[LLVMdev] A way to traverse machine basic blocks in order?
The reverse postorder iterator does what you want. It's defined in ADT/PostOrderIterator.h, and is used like this: ReversePostOrderTraversal<Function*> RPOT(&F); for (ReversePostOrderTraversal<Function*>::rpo_iterator RI = RPOT.begin(), RE = RPOT.end(); RI != RE; ++RI) <work here> Creating a ReversePostOrderTraversal is not cheap, because it first has to