similar to: Browse List propagation under Samba

Adam Nielsen schrieb: >> It is configured as an NT domain controller and has been working >> well. I needed to add a routed (over VPN) connection to the system >> but cannot get the routed clients to access the browse list. The >> clients are all Windows XP professional. The remote client is not a >> domain member. All clients work when directly connected to the Samba

I am running Samba 3.4.8 as a PDC on Solaris 10. I recently made this the WINS master- previously the BDC (Samba 3.0.37 on another Solaris 10 server.) I also use Sonicwall ipsec VPN for remote access (Windows XP clients.) The sonicwall client creates a virtual NIC on the client so that the client can have an IP address directly on the company LAN (ie. the same LAN as the samba

I had some discussion about this problem at the end of January and have investigated further. The problem: Clients directly connected to the subnets of the Samba server get a browse list (network neigborhood), while clients that access the serveer over a router do not. there are no broadcasts, Samba is functioning as a WINS server and is working for all clients (nblookup proves this). I

Hi all, I've had cross-subnet browsing working in Samba in the past, though I tend to struggle with it each time I set it up. For whatever reason, I can't seem to get things working this time. Summary: Only my desktop, not the file server, shows up in the desktop's Network Neighborhood. (I have left the machines running for several hours, in case there's a time-to-sync issue

I realize this is not a strictly a samba "problem" but I am hoping that there is a samba solution. I have a samba 3.6.20 PDC. I am running WINS. We use an IPSec client VPN to allow users with Windows 7 laptops to connect to the office remotely. The windows 7 laptops are joined to the Samba domain. Password expiration policies are enforced. When you login to

I am trying to get Samba 2.0.3 up on MacOSXServer (which is BSD 4.4). I can't get NT to recognize samba shares. Samba is running as security=server, pointed to an NT PDC for security (using the netbios name; should this be by ip address?); passwords are encrypted. I can use smbclient to attach to my own samba shares. I can also attach to other NT shares as a client and view network lists. I

Dear Samba List, I have been running a Samba PDC (Win 2000 & XP Clients) for about 1 year without problems. Now I find I cannot add new PCs to the domain, existing accounts are working fine. It seems to be a rights issue, but I am not sure quite how to analyse it. All attempts to add a computer account result in "unknown user or wrong password" (translated from German, may not be

Hi, I've been using rsync (V 3.09) in non-daemon mode for a while to backup and/or sync various linux machines (sometimes to & from windows shares). I would like to reduce the stuff in my log files to the minimum (as I see it) and cannot find the appropriate parameters to rsync. I can obviously turn all logging off, but would like to see just the names (with path is ok, but not

Dear List, I seem to have created myself a problem to which I can't find an answer. I am using Dovecot (0.99.13-4.FC2 on Fedora Core 2) with Mozilla Thunderbird on Windows XP and Linux as IMAP client software. I renamed a folder to a name that included spaces (it fitted the pupose better), then later realised that I would have to change my procmail rules to suit. As I wasn't sure what

We just installed samba 2.0.3 and configured with swat. It seems great, but after try to use smbpasswd we get the following error: inis-11# smbpasswd -a frank New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: make_smb_from_nisp: NIS+ lookup failure: Error in accessing NIS+ cold start file... is NIS+ installed? Segmentation Fault (core dumped) inis-11# This machine did not run NIS nor NIS+! It's an

OK...Back ground... Wins server is nt4 client is redhat 7.3 latest and greatest samba 2.2 ok I work in a large network.1000 plus pcs in multiple subnets... I got rid of windows on my desktop and I am trying to get samba working with all those win9X,2000,NT boxes.... I see myself on the browse list but can not do a net view on any winx box to my linux box. I can nblookup windows pcs from my

Hello, I wonder if llvm has pure range propagation pass. Is correlated value propagation that one? It seems that it is not directly deals with ranges. Maybe there any passes that simply contain some information about value ranges? Will symbolic value range propagation be done in some time? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello everybody, we have a problem joining a domain from a remote location. The remote location is connected via VPN. Everything is working as exspected but joining the samba domain from the remote location does not work. - Server Samba Version is 3.5.10 - Windows Client is XP SP3 - Joining the domain locally works without problems - ping does work in both directions - WINS is running on the

Hi, I used the following commands on the program attached below: llvm-gcc --emit-llvm main.c -c -o main.bc opt -ipconstprop main.bc -o main1.bc diff main.bc main1.bc no difference was o/p :( The Program Segment is as shown below: #include <stdio.h> void f1(int a) { a=a+1; printf("%d",a); } void f2() { int b; b=1; f1(b); } int main() { int

Hello, I've filled a bug to track the issue we've recently seen in our LLVM-based compiler: the Correlated Value Propagation Pass may become significantly slow on certain files. According to opt time profiles, value propagation alone is very fast (less than 1 second), -O3 with value propagation turned off is acceptable (31 secs), but with value propagation included it becomes too slow

> On Dec 30, 2016, at 3:03 PM, Alex Susu via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello. > I'm writing an LLVM pass that is working on LLVM IR. > To my surprise the following LLVM pass code generates optimized code - it does copy propagation on it. It does *constant* propagation to be exact. > Value *vecShuffleOnePtr = Builder.CreateGEP(ptr_B,

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Mark Lacey <superoptimizer at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > Hi Mark, > I'm relatively new to LLVM (but not optimizing compilers), and have been > reading docs and browsing code. > Bienvenue! > I noticed in the 2.4 release notes that a sparse propagation framework had > been added based on the SCCP algorithm. I might have a need for

The old condition disallowed load propagation any time flags were defined, even with e.g. set and a constbuf reference. The new condition disallows it only with immediate propagation. (There are no opcodes that set the condition flag and have an immediate argument.) Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_target_nv50.cpp | 7

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: >> I noticed in the 2.4 release notes that a sparse propagation framework had >> been added based on the SCCP algorithm. I might have a need for exactly this >> kind of framework in order to prototype an analysis I have in mind. >> >> I also noticed, however, that this doesn't

I'm wondering what is the best way to handle constant propagation for complex types in LLVM. For example, my language needs to be able to simplify expressions involving strings by precomputing (in my own constant propagation pass) various external function calls. Here's an example program: ---------------- ; ModuleID = 'LFunction' declare i8* @"set at SS"([5 x