similar to: Samba with ADS on Sun Solaris System

Hi All, I've install Unix version 9.0 in my pc (intel workstation). I've configure network connection, file share, samba and etc. The samba package are samba-3.0.21pre1-1-noads-sunos5.9-sparc.pkg.gz. I encountered the following error while executing smbd. Please advise. Error: ./smbd: syntax error at line1: '(' unexpected Thanks in advance. Regards, Alan

hey all, i'm currently running version 2.0.7 on my Solaris 2.6 box. i'd like to upgrade to the latest (samba-3.0.22-1-noads-sunos5.9-sparc.pkg.gz) but i am not certain if it is compatible with my version of Solaris. does anyone know the answer to this? if it is not compatible, what is the latest version that is? i'm hoping i can atleast get better that 3.0.6 so i can continue with

> _____________________________________________ > From: Morimoto, Mark K > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:26 AM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > > Hello, > > I get this when I run ./configure. I have searched for other problems > and others who had the problem say its due to cc

You accidentally asked the development list this... However, the program is quite compatible, and upgrades easily. If you want to be careful, install the new samba somewhere other than on your production machine, then run the new version of testparm on the smb.conf file from your older system. Ask this list about any errors and warnings (and CC me (:-)). Then try using the new samba to

hi all, http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/content/submitted/samba_on_solaris8.html this is in reference to the article posted above. i was able to install samba-3.0.22-1-noads-sunos5.9-sparc.pkg.gz on my Sunfire 280R, testparm went OK, can ping & access SWAT using my Win98 desktop browser. however, when i try accessing the share folder using my desktop, as in, Start > Run >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Puppet 0.25.1 - code name "zoot" - is now available. The 0.25.1 release is a maintenance release in the 0.25.x branch. The release is available at: http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/puppet/puppet-0.25.1.tar.gz http://reductivelabs.com/downloads/gems/puppet-0.25.1.gem Please report issues and feedback via the Reductive Labs Redmine site:

I have the following three models created applying the polymorphic concept ========================================================================== class SoftwareCi < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :ci, :as => :content end class HardwareCi < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :ci, :as => :content end class Ci < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :content, :polymorphic => true end The

Hi, Just to clarify I am looking for a whole machine function analysis not just something restricted to within a machine basic block. Thanks. Regards, Venu. From: Raghavan, Venugopal Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2017 12:56 PM To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Reaching definitions on Machine IR post register allocation Hi, Given a definition of a register by a machine instruction in

Hi, Pradeep: I believe you had some questions about modifying bandwidth for flows/VNICs. I believe that should be fine in the recently released bits, could you please check and lets know if you still have any questions about this. Bandwidth limits can be modified using: links: dladm set-linkprop -p maxbw=<value> linkname flows: flowadm set-flowprop -p maxbw=<value> flowname (I

Hi, I'm trying to connect two asterisk instances using the method described here.. http://ofps.oreilly.com/titles/9781449332426/asterisk-OutsideConn.html under the section "Connecting two Asterisk systems together with SIP" I have an user named venu in serverA and vijay in serverB the serverA ip is 192.168.0.35 & serverB is 192.168.0.36 Here are the details of the config

Hi Venu, > On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:00 PM, Raghavan, Venugopal via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Thanks for your reply. > > I agree that adding extra register units for x86 would be the right way to fix this. Do you know if there is a plan to fix this? No concrete plan, no. We've been thinking about for quite some time now, but

Hi Krzysztof, In one of your earlier emails in this thread you mentioned that you had some changes which add extra aliases for subregisters. Did you mean for X86? And is it extra register units that you added or aliases? I tried adding extra register units for X86 through some changes in CodeGenRegisters.cpp in TableGen but I am seeing a runtime error in one of my test cases possibly due to the

Hi Venu, FWIW, I have a pass that does copy propagation after RA [1] (currently only within a basic block) that should be enabled some time in the not-too-distant future. It has been reviewed and accepted, but I'm currently working on getting a slight change to the MachineOperand representation [2] that should make the copy propagation change much simpler. I believe this change to

Hi, My name is Venugopal Raghavan and I work in AMD. I was trying to understand the code in the file LoopStrengthReduce.cpp but I am making very slow progress. Is there any additional documentation available that would help me understand the code, like a PPT presentation or a design document or maybe a paper? I did not find anything on the Internet. There are comments interspersed in the code

Hi Venu, This is happening because there is an implicit def of ECX on the COPY instruction. This was an issue on Hexagon as well. Let me give you some background. There are two kinds of implicit defs (and implicit uses, but I'll refer only to defs for brevity): (1) Those that indicate that some physical register (that is not an operand) is modified by a given instruction (EFLAGS is a good

Hi Geoff/Krzyssztof, Wouldn't the isRenamable() change be required even for the RDF based copy propagation? Maybe Hexagon does not impose ABI/ISA restrictions which require specific registers to be used in specific contexts. Also, if Geoff's copy propagation pass is invoked post-RA wouldn't it need to handle the x86 ISA feature which allows 8 bit/16 bit values to be moved into a

Following is a short description on assigning priorities to a link (via dladm). Flows will have a similar mechanism (via flowadm). thanks, -venu ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The components associated with a link or flow, such as Soft Ring Sets, Soft Rings and squeues, have kernel threads processing inbound/outbound packets. The scheduler

Is there any easy way to identify which script or service is connecting to the Asterisk manager? Somewhere on my system a script or service is trying to connect with a bad user name or password. I get the following error: connect attempt from '127.0.0.1' unable to authenticate I thought maybe I could do a tcpdump on port 5038 and try to fish out the bad username or password but I

Hi Raghavan, I concur no specific docs. What do you want to know specifically? Cheers, -Quentin > On Jul 5, 2017, at 11:16 PM, Madhur Amilkanthwar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > AFAIK, no official doc. > You can probably get better help if you ask specific questions (which part of the code you don't understand). > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:53

Hi, Sorry I took a long time to reply as it took me some time to get some understanding of the code even to ask some specific questions (I have a test case in which LSR does not kick in and wanted to understand the code to figure out why it was not kicking in). Here are some specific questions I have: 1) It appears that LSR works only for the inner-most loop. Is this correct? Can you tell