similar to: Strange behavior with file/directory permissions.

Dear all, I have the following problem: I use the following command to "push" files from "local" to a "remote" machine: [...] /usr/bin/rsync -avuz -e "ssh -1" --exclude ".Xauthority" --delete /user/home/directory/ user@remote.machine.name:/user/home/directory/ ; (The ssh is using RSA authentication btw. machines, but that's beside the

I have set up several shares which our staff will have access to. They are central repositories where we will be storing things like documents and drivers, etc. I would like to allow staff to add items into the shares, but to now be able to remove anything (Except maybe what they put in..) I have created a share called drivers: [drivers] comment = General Hardware

I'm currently going through the LLVM OCaml bindings tutorial in preparation for using LLVM in my own project. While the tutorial is very helpful, it was somewhat hard to start due to the fact that I plan on using ocamllex and ocmalyacc and the tutorial hand rolls their own lexer and parser. I have managed to adapt almost all of the tutorial code into using ocamllex and ocamlyacc (the only

On Tuesday 14 April 2009 01:29:44 Chris Wailes wrote: > I have managed to adapt almost all of the tutorial code into using ocamllex > and ocamlyacc (the only thing I'm missing is the ability to assign > precendence to user defined binary and unary operators), and was wondering > if ther would be an interest in adding my code as supplimental material. Yes! I thought it was a bit of

Hi. We just opened a gaming center and have chosen to run a FreeBsd box for our firewall. IPFW is configured at it's very basic running natd through rl0 and allowing any to any connections from the lan to the outer world. Natd controls access to the lan. We have a 6.0 mb/s ADSL net connection for all the gaming clients to use, however if a gamer starts downloading a file, that file

Hi, I've got a strange behaviour on a share when I copy files with files explorers (like Thunar, Nautilus, ...). This is the share configuration : [share1] comment = Share 01 path = /home/shares/share1 valid users = +share1 force group = share1 read only = No create mask = 0660 force create mode = 0660 directory mask = 1770 force directory mode = 1770 browseable = No

Hello 1 - Is there a way to forbid log in of some Dovecot's users ? I use NIS as authentication mechanism. 2 - Is it possible to forbid some machines (IP addresses ) to connect to Dovecot server ? Thank you

Hello all, I am struggling to get share permissions to work properly. I am currently using samba 3.6.3 with AD integration. I want to force the following permissions: - created/renamed/copied directories: 0770 - created/renamed/copied files: 0660 - file permissions should not be editable by Windows users. I have tried a lot of different combinations of parameters but failed to get the desired

I have the following setup: PDC: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10 BDC1: Samba 3.0.37 on Solaris 10 BDC2: Samba 3.4.3 on Solaris 10 Samba 3.0.37 is the bundled version of Samba. Samba 3.4.3 is compiled from source. BDC2 is a recent addition to the network. All machine use LDAP as the backend for everything. They use winbind to handle a domain trust with another domain, but otherwise

Hi, I have a quite strange problem. I have updated my Server with Suse 9.0 to Samba 2.2.8a. From that moment on I couln'd run programms directly from the share anymore. The WinXP Client says: "you dont have the permission for this file." But I have all permissions for it. This only occurs in that shares where I have set "inherit permissions" to yes. When I set it to

Hello, I'm struggling with permissions management in samba 3.0.2, ads member mode, on SuSE 9. I have essentially two questions: 1) What is the precendence of the various permissions (Filesystem, share, ACL, smb.conf, user vs. group in each) that Samba observes, and how do they effect each other? 2) Should I be able to set share-level permissions on a samba share from a Win2k machine by

Hi all I have dovecot-lda set up to run as vmail:vmail, with some sieve scripts in /var/lib/dovecot/sieve. The sieve scripts fail to be found with the following (detailed and very helpful) error message: Oct 14 16:13:33 gatekeeper dovecot[8109]: lda(minfrin at example.com)<8109><ZJ9nMo0Hh1+tHwAAKdTwig>: Error: sieve: file storage: Failed to stat sieve storage path:

hello is there a way to forbid SOME ( not all ) users's login with dovecot 2 ? I need to move their IMAP folders to another place with more disk space but I don't want to stop dovecot IMAP service for the other users as the moving process will be a bit long ( 1 Tb to move ) thanks

Hi, we have some questions concerning the definition of new arithmetic methods. In our package "distr" (on CRAN) we define some new arithmetic methods for "+", "-", "*", "/". After loading "distr" the corresponding arithmetic methods work. Now, if we define a new class and also a new method for one of the arithmetic methods

On 16-12-23 06:37 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > When VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO is negotiated, host could still send UFO > packet that exceeds a single page which could not be handled > correctly by XDP. So this patch forbids setting XDP when GUEST_UFO is > supported. While at it, forbid XDP for ECN (which comes only from GRO) > too to prevent user from misconfiguration. > > Cc: John

On 16-12-23 06:37 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > When VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO is negotiated, host could still send UFO > packet that exceeds a single page which could not be handled > correctly by XDP. So this patch forbids setting XDP when GUEST_UFO is > supported. While at it, forbid XDP for ECN (which comes only from GRO) > too to prevent user from misconfiguration. > > Cc: John

I'm not sure I agree with the semantics this patch creates. The way I see it, there are two options: 1) Make "noduplicate" non-transitive and forbid inlining when there are multiple callsites. 2) Allow inlining, but make the attribute transitive. Consider the following code, where barrier() is marked noduplicate. kernel void k() { if (x()) y(); b(); if (x()) z();

2009/4/13 Chris Wailes <chris.wailes at gmail.com>: > I'm currently going through the LLVM OCaml bindings tutorial in preparation > for using LLVM in my own project.  While the tutorial is very helpful, it > was somewhat hard to start due to the fact that I plan on using ocamllex and > ocmalyacc and the tutorial hand rolls their own lexer and parser. > > I have managed

Second iteration of my endeavour to rid nouveau, radeon and amdgpu of runtime pm ref leaks. Patches 1 to 8 are identical to v1. Patch 9 of v1 modified the DRM core to turn off all CRTCs on driver unload. Based on feedback by Daniel Vetter, I've replaced this with a helper to turn off all CRTCs, which is called by nouveau, radeon and amdgpu on unload. In other words, this is now opt-in. So

In my tftp usage I'm using the server to collect device configurations but I don't want once the files are uploaded to be accessible for download. I've solved my problem by adding --forbid-get/-F option which disables file downloads. -- Georgi Chorbadzhiyski | http://georgi.unixsol.org/ | http://github.com/gfto/ -------------- next part --------------