similar to: net rpc utility to add machine account ?

Dear Samba Friends, I've a problem to join with Windows2000-Clients a Samba-PDC. When I join the samba-pdc with a WinNT4.0-Client it is no problem, first I create a machine-account for the machine: 1. in /etc/group exists the group: machines:x:515: 2. useradd -g machines -d /dev/null -c nickname -s /bin/false neuch205$ 3. pdbedit -a -m -u neuch205 In this way, it isn't a problem to join

Todays R-1.7.0-beta (see below) compiles fine on, but it doesn't pass make check-all on WinNT4.0, SP6. Looking closer, test-IsAs fails: D:\uwe-ns\R-1.7.0\tests>make -f Makefile.win test-IsAs running tests of consistency of as/is.* make[1]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/uwe-ns/R-1.7.0/tests' creating 'isas-tests.R' make[1]: *** [isas-tests.R] Error 253 make[1]: Leaving

Dear R users, using dotplot (R1.2.0, WinNT4.0), I am trying to change the character size of the labels of the points: > # example > data(VADeaths) > dotplot(VADeaths, main = "Death Rates in Virginia - 1940") > # I'd like to have smaller character size of the labels (for age and population groups) > ?dotplot > # for argument "cex", this says:

> I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in > existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). > Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which > shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is > this: > > There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San

Hi, The Samba 1.9.16p11 is installed on Solaris 2.7 and works well with win95/98. The folders of Solaris can be mapped as a remote drive on a win95. However, when win95 is replaced by winNT4.0 the same Samba no longer works. It displays following message when I try to map a solaris folder to a win drive. "The account is not authorizeded to login from this station". I try to add a

Hi all, I am a beginner to samba. I use redhat7.2. I have a printer at winnt4.0 server. I want to configure redhat7.2 at my desk to connect and to be able to printe printer. How can I do this? Thanks inadvnace, Regards, lonh

Hi Hammer and all, I have got one mail from one of Joel Hammer. Thanks for your time and your kindness. I couldnot print document to my printer yet. Again, I have printer at winnt4.0 server. I want to connect to this printer from RedHat machine. I use RedHat 7.2. I type "smbclient '\\s_primary\IT_8000N' -U slonh". I have got as following: added interface

Hi All, I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. To support that, GCC chooses the approach by extending the memory order flag in __atomic_* builtins with target-specific memory model in high bits (bit 31-16 for

Hello all, I'm using Samba 2.2.5 compiled on Solaris 8 for my PDC, I've included my smb.conf below. My client machines are all winnt4.0 service pack 6, but I can't get them to log in to the PDC reliably. Very rarely will they log in properly, I usually get the "Domain controller could not be contacted" error message. Does anyone have any advice? Thanks! Beau

Hi, I'm trying to mount with smbmount a WinNT4.0 share resource from a Linux running Samba 2.2.2.=20 WinNT box is installed with code page=3D850. The resource name includes grave accented characters, in particular: =E0. I'm trying to smbmount with: $ smbmount '//NThostname/of=E0rs' /mnt/ofors -o ip=3Dxxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,username=3Dofors,password=3D******,workgroup=3Dwwwwww where:

X86: expose HLE/RTM features to dom0 Intel recently release 2 new features, HLE and TRM. Refer to http://software.intel.com/file/41417. This patch expose them to dom0. Signed-off-by: Liu, Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com> diff -r 92e03310878f xen/arch/x86/traps.c --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Wed Feb 08 21:05:52 2012 +0800 +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c Mon Feb 27 02:23:42 2012 +0800 @@ -857,9

Hi All, I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. To support that, GCC chooses the approach by extending the memory order flag in __atomic_* builtins with target-specific memory model in high bits (bit 31-16 for

Here is the patch 0004-Enable-HLE-code-generation.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. > To

Here is the patch 0002-Add-HLE-target-feature.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. > To support

Hi Michael, Why do you want to add transactional memory support to LLVM ? Can't you implement transactional memory using a library call ? Judging by the number of patches it looks like a major change to LLVM, and I am not sure that I understand the motivation for including it in LLVM. Thanks, Nadav On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Michael Liao <michael.liao at intel.com> wrote:

Here is the patch 0003-Add-XACQ-XREL-prefix-and-encoding-asm-printer-suppor.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and

Can a router between two subnets (call it A and B) be the local master browser of the one subnet (net A) in a NT domain, when the Domain Master Browser (as well as PDC and BDC) are located in the other subnet (B)? Will say, does the Domain Master Browser of a NT domain accept a Local Master Browser in the same subnet (as the router is accessed from B via the interface ethB)? The reason for my

Hi Can somebody help me concerning this problm with samba. I am using samba 2.0.7 to link clearcase DB files on server UNIX with NT clearcase clients. We have upgraded clients from winNT4.0 to win2000 . Now we have many trouble like : PC stuck performance very slow file not found ( it exists!) etc... I saw in the samba log file of users the message as follow: cbc0794634 (137.x.x.x) connect to

Uwe & Marc, Adding the --vanilla flag doesn't help. Actually, the crash happens if I browse to a folder on a mapped drive. I.e., if I type in "q:\Andy" in the text box, it works, but if I try to browse to Q:\Andy and then click on OK, that's when it crashes. Andy > From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de] > > Marc Schwartz wrote: >

Hi, I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error message from virt-manager is Error starting domain: unsupported configuration: guest and host CPU are not compatible: Host CPU does not provide required features: rtm,