similar to: Can't set ACL on Samba

Hi Folks, I am experiencing some problems with samba 3.0.20 which I can not solve on my own. We have updated from samba 3.0.10 to samba 3.0.20, but I am not sure when the problems started. We had a problem with idmap - I had hoped to solve - before. Whenever we rebooted the server, all of the ACLs got jumbled up. I thought that our winbindd_idmap.tdb somehow got broken. I re-created it, but

Hi everybody, i'm getting mad regarding a very serious (since it's happening on a production server) issue with a samba domain joined installation. This machine has worked perfectly for an year and the last configuration tune up and version upgrade (3.0.23c) went along fine in the first days of January. It's been two weeks approximately now since we started to have a bad issue, a

Paul, >1. Which user is logged on the the windows workstation trying to modify >a file on the samba share? Henrique are user, this user is in the list of administrators of the samba, but he is not administrator of the PDC (windows 2003). It looks at the parameters below of smb.conf: admin users = corniani, administrator, henrique >2. What are the ACLs on that file before you try to

Hi, I'm getting confused about the role that kerberos authentication plays. What exactly is the point of using kerberos to join a samba server to an AD domain? If using kerberos still requires you to rely on winbindd for all the nsswitch stuff then what is the point? I can just as easily specify workgroup = wkgrp security =

hi, sorry if this topic already exists, but i haven't found a solution yet. I am using a Samba PDC with OpenLDAP. After updating my Samba 2.2.7 to version 3.0.7, I encountered the following problem : All my Windows-clients are able to logon to the Domain but it takes several minutes until the Client finally is logged on. If I try to open a directory that is stored on the server, it takes

Hi all I'm having some problems trying to configure ACLs from a Win2000 SP3 client. I'm running Samba 2.2.5 on kernel 2.4.18 (with acl + ext attr), Samba is compiled with acl support etc. Samba is configured with security=domain, and is running with local groups etc rather than thru winbind, I haven't been game enough to tread those waters yet. With the debug level set to 5

Well, I screwed around a bit and after doing a "wbinfo -u" and a "wbinfo -g" I stopped getting the "unable to map SID" error. Now I'm getting a different error. ;-D [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(FC2-i386-disc1.iso) returning 0744 [2004/05/25 09:09:34, 3] smbd/posix_acls.c:convert_canon_ace_to_posix_perms(2500)

Guys. Two Questions: 1) when trying to set up permissions within W2k to a Samba Shared File, I get access denied, My Conf is Suse 9.1 Pro Samba 3.0.7 (ACL support) Reiserfs with ACL support (setfacl works) - Winbind works great - Everything smooth When I try to set up the permissions from W2K I get Access Denied but I can see that log message says... --> Too many ACE entries for file . to

Hello, Does anyone test ZFS on Linux and ACLs? I can't setup POSIX ACLs and any extended even using acl_xattr or acl_tdb. Is any way to use ACLs with ZFS on Linux (Samba 3 or 4)? Best regards /Adrian Berlin --

Whenever I try to read or modify ACLs from my Windows 2000 PDC, my Samba Domain Member Server (Security = ADS) does not allow setting ACLs, nor does it display the existing ACLs. - I have setup ACLs in my Kernel - I have translated and installed libacl and libattr - I can see and modify ACLs with getfacl and setfacl. - I have translated Samba 3.0.23d with --with-acl-support=yes - I have enabled

Hello, I'm using winbindd with samba 3.0.1. Everything starts up as expected and tests return the expected results (wbinfo and getent). Files created via windows clients are create with the proper ownership and group membership. When I attempt to modify the permissions via the windows security tab (add another group, change ownership for example) I'll get a win pop up saying

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I am encountering a problem with Samba and setting acl's for files/directories from the security dialog on my Windows clients. I can easily toggle the file permissions. However, it am not able to add/remove user/groups from the GUI interface on my windows clients. I have also noticed when I add access with setfacl it doesn't not

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I'm currently trying to get ACLs to work with my Samba-PDC. I compiled Samba with the "--with-acl-support"-option and the configure-script says: checking sys/acl.h usability... yes checking sys/acl.h presence... yes checking for sys/acl.h... yes After install, a "ldd smbd" gives libacl.so.1 => /lib/libacl.so.1

Hello, I am running Samba 3.0.28 on a Solaris 10 8/07 x86_64 machine. Directory services and authentication are provided by MS Active Directory's LDAP and Kerberos. My problem is that, when attempting to add an ACE to a file from Windows (XP, SP2), I get an error saying "Access Denied". The share is a directory on a ZFS filesystem (NFSv4 ACLs). Below is the share definition:

At the suggestion of Stas, I'm starting a new thread on this one. This pretty much covers where I'm at right now: Doug, thanks, here's a complete listing of the config file, and some logging, hopefully this will be illuminating to somebody. > Neither of these lines set the log level. Yes, I've been setting it in the init script. When I do ps -ef | grep smbd, I see that

Hi, I have a Samba4 File Server on Debian 10 I am not being able to assign permissions on shares to groups that already have the Unix attribute set. Groups without the Unix attribute are working OK. My two DC are Samba4 (migrated of the Windows 2008 Server) and my current File Servers are Windows 2008 Server. I followed "Setting up a Share Using Windows ACLs" tutorial (

Hi, i'm experiencing a strange behavior in the way samba shows file and folders permissions under windows explorer. When i open the folder or file properties under windows (xp sp2 btw), it shows in the Security panel all the entries, both classical posix ones and posix acl ones; but if i select each one of them to see file permissions, it will show only the permission of users indicated

> a <- 0 ; for(i in (1:200000000)) a <- a + 1/i > b <- 0 ; for(i in (200000000:1)) b <- b + 1/i > c <- sum(1/(1:200000000)) > d <- sum(1/(200000000:1)) > order(c(a,b,c,d)) [1] 1 2 4 3 > b<c [1] TRUE > c==d [1] FALSE I'd expected b being the largest, since we sum up the smallest numbers first. Instead, c is the largest, which is

Hi I just installed Samba 2.0.4 under Solaris 2.5.1 Now when someone trys to save a MS Word file to his home directory on the SUN he gets a "not enough permissions" msg. Looking on the unix side I see a file ~WRD1741.tmp with permissions of 000 . I upped the log level to 3 and found this .. call_nt_transact_set_security_desc: file = forNT/~WRD1741.tmp, sent 0x7 [1999/05/19

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share from the local EXT4 filesystem. When trying to