similar to: 3.0.20b and Heimdal

I've samba running an embedded linux system (2.6.x kernel with uClibc). I'= m trying to transfer some medium to large files (65-225 MB). I'm using simp= le windows explorer drag/drop to write the files to the embedded system. T= he file transfer dialog will show some progress then lock up for a few minu= tes. After this it reports with "The specified network name is no longer

Dear All, Would like some know the answer on the above question. What is the different between compiling using internal heimdal library vs mit-krb5. I'm on gentoo and thus like other distro having issue on the system-wide mit-krb and removing it is not that convenient (But still possible) I've try to compile samba 4.1.2 with internal heimdal library to work as a Domain controller But

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everybodey, i can't compile 3.0.20 the following message occurs : Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:452, ~ from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/local/heimdal-0.7/include/krb5.h:660: error: syntax error at '#' token /usr/local/heimdal-0.7/include/krb5.h:660: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or

samba-3.0.21c, heimdal-0.7.2 The heimdal documentation[1] talks about a samba integration when both samba and heimdal are using ldap as their backends. I quote: "Now you can proceed as in See Using LDAP to store the database. Heimdal will pick up the Samba LDAP entries if they are in the same search space as the Kerberos entries." There is absolutely no further documentation. I tried

My college is kerberized, and so in many situations authentication is both faster and more secure using kerberos tickets. Sadly I have run into a problem. The Heimdal included in FreeBSD seems to be incompatible with my school's servers running MIT kerberos when authenticating over gssapi. For example ssh in verbose mode returns: debug2: we sent a gssapi-with-mic packet, wait for reply

Trying to follow Chapter 9.3.3 of S3BE to create a SuSE 8.2 Active Directory domain member server. 9.3.3 says heimdal >= .6 is required. I installed the Sernet packages and saw 0.6.2 source is included. Running ./configure after unpacking the heimdal source completes OK, but running make results in the following errors: creating libss.la /usr/bin/sed: can't read

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Hi List, >> >> I do my best to ask my question in english. ;-) >> >> Samba4 integrated heimdal kerberos to do the kerberos work for >> Active Directory. Some Linux Distributions like fedora/RedHat and >>

Hi List, I do my best to ask my question in english. ;-) Samba4 integrated heimdal kerberos to do the kerberos work for Active Directory. Some Linux Distributions like fedora/RedHat and openSUSE/SUSE don't accept heimdal even if it is shipped inside samba. Their argument is that heimdal isn't maintained since 2012. Compiling samba against MIT krb5 results in Samba-Packages without

I have a freshly installed FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 system, which comes with Heimdal & OpenSSH w/GSSAPI enabled (version 4.1p1 FreeBSD-20050605) Most of the servers I connect to have OpenSSH w/GSSAPI enabled but they use MIT Kerberos (1,3.x and 1.4.x) Now, I can use ticket authentication between all systems where the libraries are all the same (Heimdal or MIT), but trying to use, for example,

On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 12:26 +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 00:07 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba > wrote: > > > > Am 2017-01-04 um 23:49 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > > > > > > > > > > > on my way to 4.5.3 now > > > > compiling samba-4.5.3 on gentoo *failed* right now > > > >

Hi! I already asked a similar question before, but it keeps popping up in different contexts and forms, and the more I use samba myself, the more often it comes to me too, especially in context of using various security tokens for auth. And the more I think about all this, the more sane it looks to me. The thing is: mit-krb5 has much better user-level support than heimdal. But samba does not

I have some problem whit Kerberos. OS: FreeBSD 5.3 Domain: W2k3 native mode. 1)I am Installing Heimdal 0.6.1 over port. Config /etc/krb5.conf %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP 2)Compile and install Heimdal 0.6.4 over source %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit:

We would like to build a SuSE Professional 8.2 box as a Domain Member Server in a Windows 2000 Active Directory domain, and we are referencing Chapter 9.3.3 of Samba3-By-Example. The version of heimdal supplied with SuSE 8.2 is 0.4e. S3BE references heimdal version 0.6 plus patches. Since SuSE often backports fixes from later versions of products into older versions, the question is: will

I've had some trouble compiling GSSAPI on SuSE Enterprise 9 using Heimdal. It turns out that this installation has /usr/include/heimdal/gssapi.h rather than gssapi/gssapi.h. krb5-config correctly sets -I/usr/include/heimdal in the CFLAGS. Looking back, there was a similar issue a few months ago:- http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-July/014945.html I'm a complete newbie to

Hello is there any support planned for heimdal with samba 3 ? heimdal is a free (BSD sense) kerberos implementation which is used in all *BSD. i have read samba 3 support only mit-kerberos. so in that matter, *BSD can't support Active Directory (and another example, winbind is also not supported on openbsd) Regards Julien

What is the difference between Heimdal and MIT as far usability goes? MIT seems to be the default on major linux distrobutions, but I here a lot about people preferring Heimdal, but I can't find any reasons why. Is one generally more stable/faster/reliable than the other? There is already a blank wiki page at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_%26_Kerberos so if anyone has any good

On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 10:45 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 2017-01-05 um 00:28 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > > > > > > > > > In Debian we re-bundled heimdal.  Samba is only known to work and > > > is > > > only tested with the bundled copy.  The semi-private interfaces > > > we > > > use > > > with the

I have FreeBSD-6.1 and it appears the default installation has a full complement of Kerberos5. But, /usr/src/kerberos5/README states: This subtree is world-exportable, as it does not contain any cryptographic code. At the time of writing, it did not even contain source code, only Makefiles and headers. Please maintain this "exportable" status quo. Thanks!

Could somebody please confirm that they are actually using 8.1-R with heimdal as a KDC successfully? A little confirmation would help me greatly. Thanks, Jason C. Wells

correction samba-dc still doesn't come with samba-tool On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Jeff Sadowski <jeff.sadowski at gmail.com> wrote: > I would like to start testing this? I saw a few months back Alexander > Bokovoy Released a build for F23 and I started using that. Now that F24 > is out I have to look for a way to upgrade. Is there a build for rawhide > with this?