similar to: RES: LDAP howto

Does anyone know of a good Samba-LDAP howto for Debian (Sarge) systems? I probably don't need it for my home network, but I'd like to learn how to do it anyway. My previous attempts to get it working have failed. :(

Hi list, I?m trying to get help from list but I am not being happy. What I need to do to get It??? I getting this on syslog file: Sep 21 14:59:15 zeus slapd[2123]: conn=18 fd=15 ACCEPT from IP=127.0.0.1:32791 (IP=0.0.0.0:389) Sep 21 14:59:15 zeus slapd[2123]: conn=18 op=0 BIND dn="cn=samba,ou=DSA,dc=cultura,dc=gov,dc=br" method=128 Sep 21 14:59:15 zeus slapd[2123]: conn=18 op=0 BIND

I have an environment to make test. I go to try to mount a partition xfs in this server of test. I thank its help. -----Mensagem original----- De: Paul K?lle [mailto:pkoelle@gmail.com] Enviada em: quarta-feira, 28 de setembro de 2005 10:53 Para: Luis Henrique de Faria Guimar?es Assunto: Re: RES: RES: RES: [Samba] Re: ACLs with Problem Luis Henrique de Faria Guimar?es wrote: > I forgive me

Hello all, This might have been fixed in later versions (I am using R1.7.0), r-help archive contains messages reporting similar problems but no reports of codes fixes. I have encountered a couple of problems using the silhouette function. one occurs when the clustering contains clusters composed of 1 element (Martin Maechler posted code few months ago that fixes a similar problem that occurs

Thank you all, for the advices and answers. They are being very useful. And I may not know a lot of things about Samba but I sure know why samba was written for (cheers John!) :-) BTW I am reading the Samba-HOWTO-Collection, thanks again. I considered changing to LDAP but time was a problem (as usual), now I will reconsider the LDAP idea. I will use the Samba 3 new release as soon as possible,

yes i have, this is my share-config: [share] path = /mnt/gluster/daten/share/ public = yes writeable = yes browseable = yes inherit permissions = Yes inherit acls = Yes map acl inherit = Yes nt acl support = yes vfs objects = acl_xattr F?bio Leandro Rodrigues Cordeiro schrieb: > Hi, > > Have you tried adding the share writeable? > [share] > writeable = yes > > att, >

Hi Greg, Really, the first step to install filesystem it with support ACL. It looks at my archive: LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults,acl 1 1 LABEL=/boot /boot ext3 defaults 1 2 LABEL=/data /data ext3 defaults,acl 1 2 none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620

I believe that you it did not understand my explanation. I have a Linux server executing samba intergrated with a server windows 2003 (PDC). Linux is using the users of windows 2003 saw winbind. But, the permissions for these of archive do not function. When I try to change the permissions of an archive in the sharing of the samba, it I do not function. The part of ACL of the samba is not

Hi All, I am experiencing a strange problem with authentication process. Everything was going very fine until today, my users account stop to login on domain, but the administrator account is the only one that can do it without problems. I get this error log. Sep 19 11:04:32 zeus smbd[3227]: [2005/09/19 11:04:32, 2] smbd/sesssetup.c:setup_new_vc_session(608) Sep 19 11:04:32 zeus smbd[3227]:

Has the driver for this printer been installed on the samba server? If it has, it may have to be reinstalled. If the 4550 can't be installed on the server, you can create a printer share for [picasso] and use: use client driver = yes path = /var/spool/public create mode = 0700 printable = yes public = yes browseable = yes Then the Win2k/XP clients will install the driver locally,

Thanks Rowland for response. OK, setup the "log level = 10". I noticed something today. I have to restart the samba server 2 times. In the second restart I did a named restart too. Maybe could be something related to communication to named? I did the named.conf conforming the wiki, adding these 2 lines: options { .... # DNS dynamic updates via kerberos tkey-gssapi-keytab

Hello peaplo. I?m training to establish a domain relationship. The first comand "#net rpc trustdom adm aaa -S bkp -U root%111 -I 192.168.0.1" is working fine. But when a trai to establish with this command: "#net rpc trustdom establish adm -S bkp -U root%111 -I 192.168.0.1" I receive this message: [2006/05/23 18:16:45, 0] utils/net_rpc.c:rpc_trustdom_establish(4632)

Hello, Has anyone got netgroups working with Samba 3.0.14a where the netgroups are stored in the LDAP directory? I'm using Solaris 9 and SUN's directory server v5.2. What I'm seeing is that samba goes through the motions of looking up a host in a netgroup, but no query is seen by the LDAP server or on the network and the host is never found in the netgroup. Any help would be

Hi I would like to have changes (chown) in the destination. However, some files did not changed size or rights. All files should have new owner. Thanks, Regards,CJ Em Quinta-feira, 10 de Setembro de 2015 20:26, Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> escreveu: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rsync does not change anything on the source.  Only on the target. Only

Problem solved. As long as I know it is related to the fact that I was using the same range of ID's (both GID and UID) in my smb.conf. Change these values to different ranges and I am now being able to authenticate well. Best regards, -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Bruno Martins Sent: segunda-feira,

The same problem ocurred today. The same log in /var/log/messages in DC, and I have to stop and start the samba service. Any help is appreciate. Regards, Rafael ----- Mensagem original ----- De: "Rafael Domiciano" <r.domiciano at senff.com.br> Para: "Rowland Penny" <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org Enviadas: Terça-feira, 1 de

----- Mensagem Original -----=20 Eu boicotaria estas empresas s=F3 pelo fato de financiarem os enjoativos e = rancentos Cassetas, mas me surpreendi ao descobrir que tantos produtos que = eu costumo comprar s=E3o transg=EAnicos. Fui conferir no site do greenpeace= e =E9 verdade!!!!!!!!!!!!! Boicote neles! ----- Original Message -----=20 C A M P A N H A=20 N A T A L S E M B A I X A R I A

Hello, I've got a potentially major problem: I've recently changed from samba-TNG (vintage last February) which was working tolerably well in our environment barring a few locking problems and the ever increasing tdb files and memory footprint. As our number of clients has passed 150, the amount of memory used on our Solaris server became unsustainable and I took the decision to migrate

Hello, I may be missing something, but it seems that there has been a change between 3.0.14a and 3.0.20 which means that a user's primary UNIX group HAS to be mapped to a valid NT group (i.e. the primary UNIX group in the LDAP DB has to have the sambagroupmapping attribute and a SID). Can anyone confirm this as a new requirement or am I being a bit stupid? I'm using an LDAP backend with

Hello, When attempting to build samba-4.0.0beta2 on Solaris 10 update 9, the following error is produced: [ 530/3371] Compiling lib/tdb/test/external-agent.c ../lib/tdb/test/external-agent.c:7:17: error: err.h: No such file or directory Waf: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/samba-4.0.0beta2/bin' Build failed: -> task failed (err #1): {task: cc external-agent.c ->