similar to: Permissions Problem (?)

With a recent stable FreeBSD freebie.xs4all.nl 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Aug 31 14:17:04 CEST 2003 root@freebie.xs4all.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBIE i386 and a recent mbmon build: xmbmon-203 I'm now getting interesting results: wkb@freebie ~: mbmon Temp.= 255.0, 240.0, 255.0; Rot.= 11250, 270000, 225000 Vcore = 1.52, 3.15; Volt. = 3.20, 5.08, 15.50,

Al writes: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > If this is the case, then all of the other zero initializations can be > > removed as well. I figured that if most of the fields were being > > zeroed, then ones _not_ being zeroed would lead to this problem. > > Other zero initializations in inode->u certainly can be > removed, but whether it's

Hi Ansley It looks good to me but I did not run the analysis as I am too lazy to install "indicspecies". The inclusion of the raw data is a great help. John Kane Kingston ON Canada -----Original Message----- From: daily.puja at gmail.com Sent: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:16:54 -0400 To: jrkrideau at inbox.com Subject: Re: [R] Indicator Species analysis; trouble with multipatt Thanks for the

Hi all, I'm trying to connect to a share on an NT server from a Redhat Linux 7.2 server with the following command: smbmount //Fac-Staff/tansley$ /home/tomansley/law_share -o username=LAW\\tansley,password=realpassword The same command works from my linux workstation!!! Anybody got any clue as to what might be holding me up? I was thinking maybe my firewall but am not sure. Any help

Hi all, My server is connected to a UPS but whenever there is a power failure or spike it seems that once all the clients come back up they cannot connect. I have to restart the server each time. This is no hardship but I was just wondering if anybody had the same problem and if so and they fixed it, how? Thanks Tom Ansley

Hi. I want to use ACL on my RH-9.0 box (x86), so I got ext3 ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ and tried to apply it to the kernel that ships with RH (2.4.20-8). The patching fails on some vm file so I got a vanila kernel 2.4.20, apply the patch and compile it. This works fine. Also RH-9.0 precompiled Samba 2.2.7 works fine with ACL. I connected to my share with WinXP and do some testing

I finally had a chance to spend some time on Olly's idea about generating documentation for the object-oriented PHP wrapper http://www.oligarchy.co.uk/xapian/patches/xapian9.phps >Another way to approach it might be to postprocess Doxygen's XML output >(which would allow mechanical changes to match PHP syntax). > > I wrote an xslt script to test the idea (It is one of the

Hello! In samba 3 we used create mask , force create..?? to set file permisions. In samba 4 as I understand those options are? ignored and default acls are used instead. But, is it possible to set? by default different permisions on files and folders?? For example?? on folders rwx, and on files rw-. Because I dont want to give x? permision to file as I think it can be dangerous. Thanks in

Hi, I'm kinda new to samba so forgive my ignorance. I want to set up users so that depending on the user you would have access - read, write or read/write both. I know that is is possible to specify whether the drive is read only, write etc. So is it possible to set priveleges at the user level? thanx. Abhishake

I had to migrate to RedHat Enterprise Linux ES 3.0. Actually I had to do is a complete OS install, NOT an upgrade. What this means is that I had to reinstall Samba and configure it. I'm using Samba 3.0.4-6.3E (a Redhat rpm) with smbpasswd as password backend. My pourpose was to be seamless to the end users. Without changes at PC users. I will be using the same physical server, but in

if I set "inherit permissions = Yes" on my share, samba shuld set permisions for new files like uper directory - true? I'am asking because, I've set this parameter and nothing is going good. When I make new file in this share the groupID is set to user groupID whose create this file, but not the guid of the uper directory. The userID is set corectly. smb.conf: .... [test]

This one may well be the first fully capable audio/midi DAW program to work in both Windows and Linux. This is because it is not based on Microsoft's framework. I got the freebie while this offer was around. Version 2 is supposed to come out soon. (I presently use Cakewalk Home Studio--Sonar's not so little sister and a lot of bang for the buck. I have gotten used to drawing

On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:44:50PM +0530, Akash Jain wrote: > Hi All > > I found there is one bug in the plugin. The name of the attribute for ACL as > per strace output of nfs4_setfacl is system.nfs4_acl. > The source code has defined it as > #define NFS4ACL_XATTR_NAME      ( "system.nfs4acl" ) > > Note there is missing underscore. > > After this, the

Hello all, this patch allows master process to drop more root priveleges under Solaris. My limited testing shows that code works, but I'm not sure that defined privilege set is permissive enough for dovecot. Unfortunately I have no root access to our Solaris servers to really test it. So if someone is ready to test this patch please do it :) Best regards. -------------- next part

R version 3.2.2. library(vegan) I was to look at community tables from my dendrograms and am trying out the vegemite command. This is the error I get: Error in vegemite(apst, apst.clusters) : Cowardly refusing to use longer than 1 char symbols: Use scale I thought the problem was that I was using the log transformed data, but I tried it on the raw (which is single digit numbers), and still

I have one share (f.e. SYS) with mamy FOXPRO aplications in different folders. I've to gave to some people permisions to write and some people permision to readonly. share: \\samba\SYS with: drwxrwx--- root aplication1 aplication1 drwxrwx--- root aplication2 aplication2 drwxrwx--- root aplication3 aplication3 I have tree groups one for each folder in share (SYS) people

Hello dancers, I upgraded SAMBA to version 4.9 in three little companies. Then we have found an error with permissions, on shared discs where is VFS:recycle enabled, new created folders seem to be ok, but new files are writable only from owner. Getfacl gets back mask r-- so effective rights are changed. Shared discs without VFS:recycle work fine, and if I disable VFS:recycle on shared

I have a samba share that has the following permissions: create mask = 0775 force create mode = 0664 directory create mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0764 1.) Does this means DOS/windows files will be created as rwxrwxr-x per "create mask" or rw-rw-r-- per "force create mode"? 2.) Do I need both create mask & force create mode or is one

Hi, I'm using rsync with cygwin to synchronize two windows servers. I've got files in server side with full permisions to Administrator user, but when i synchronize it with another windows server, the file placed in client side has a new group called NONE with read , write and execute permisions. I'm using the following line to call rsync: rsync -zvvvr --perms --owner --group

Hello, I have been struggling as of late to successfully configure a pci passthrough using libvirt with kvm. Hoping someone can shed some light on the problem. Overall my experience with virtualization limited is so please forgive. The guest runs fine till passthrough is configured. I am using virt-manager. This has been tried on both a Fedora17 x86_64 and Arch Linux x86_64 build with pretty much