similar to: incoherent oplock request/reply

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "incoherent oplock request/reply"

2003 Oct 09
1
2.2.5 performanc issues...
We are trying to troubleshoot slow performance. A lot of my NT client log files show messages like this about oplock break issues. [2003/10/09 12:50:39, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2907 on port 61752 for dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 2 64 [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(395) process_local_message:
2000 May 03
2
2.0.7: unsolicited oplock break reply
I've used oplocks = no for a long time now, because of the famous "oplock_break" error, but I decided to give 2.0.7 a try. I still get "oplock break" errors as before, but this time I got a new error too: [2000/05/02 10:04:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(976) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file XXXXX/xxxxxx/mailbox.pst
2001 Feb 23
2
Unsolicited oplock breaks
Dear All, we've been having some intermittent problems with students who's home directories are on a Sun E450 running Samba 2.0.6. I'm not totally convinced that the problem is caused by the server, but may be the network. However, I've had a look at the log.smb file and I'm seeing some error messages that I've not come across before: [2001/02/23 18:20:40, 0]
2003 Sep 04
0
Weird samba problems / more info
I have a level 10 debug of the smbd/oplock process_local_message problem but can still not figure out what causes the unknown UDP message command code. I checked the source but could only see that this is an invalid opcode command. Anyone a clue what is happening here ? Might wrong opcode commands crash samba ? Peter [2003/09/04 11:50:12, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685) switch
2001 Nov 29
1
locking ? problems (follow up to: strange problems)
Hi all, Jeremy, after trying to add kernel oplocks = no I got the same errors as describes in my last post. (samba working, but some folders not accessible, even not from commandline unix, can't kill smbd processes......) This is what happens in the log file: any ideas ? [2001/11/29 16:13:00, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(610) pc08ust (10.21.1.8) connect to service exchangejg99 as
2001 Nov 29
1
(no subject)
Hi Alexander, Not sure if this of any help, but we had a similar problem with runaway SMBDs and what seemed to be oplocks. We are running RH6.2 with 0.7.26 ACLs. After much messing around and hassling Jeremy, I eventually changed the kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.2.20 and recompiled everything from scratch. Since then we have not had one of these rogue processes. I think Jeremy was right when he
2002 Oct 11
0
RE: [R-gui] NEdit Highligth patterns for R
Hi I agree with your comments and of course you identifie the problems regarding the implementation of your suggestions. Of course we'd need bidireccional communication to implement it. I think it's impossible to do it statically. What I want with NEdit is a very ligth editor (which jedit is not) that highlights the most important language syntax, so that It becomes easier to write
2002 Nov 16
1
file locks problem??
Hello, i am running Samba 2.2.3a on a Red Hat Linux 7.3 box with kernel 2.4.18-10. I am experiencing some problems on a particular samba share, which is accessed by 10 Windows 98SE clients working on a COBOL production packet by mapping with a G: letters this samba folder. Well, some times a day it happens that this packed blocks because some files on that samba folder remains locked; i
2002 Sep 12
0
2.2.5, MSAccess XP Database files (mdb) corrupt
Hi, i have a problem with access xp (2002) database files after moving the files to the linux files server. really often (6 times today) the database file is corrupt. i am running samba 2.2.5 on linux mandrake 8.2 with kernel 2.4.18. i have read that this has something to do with the file locking, but don't know what to do right now. i've set the parameter "veto oplock files =
2005 Mar 03
3
Quickbooks files can't be shared w/ 3.0.11
The second instance of Quickbooks shows a "file may be corrupt" message. 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH /MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBW Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 56310 DENY_NONE 0x2019f RDWR EXCLUSIVE+BATCH / MY_REALLY_LONG_PATH/My File.QBI Thu Mar 3 19:42:20 2005 It works on Windows - just copied the same file to a network mapped windows
2003 Jan 14
0
Oplocks_break FAILURE in 2.2.7? hmm..
Dear Samba team. I have hybrid network with MSDOS / Win9x(ME) / Win2k/XP(NT) computers at home. I'm using Samba as PDC. W9x/me clients works fine as so as with roving profiles, but I'm experiencing problems with w2k, NT4/XP just not test because i'm testing on my box at home and when it'll work fine then I'll go to clients from which smaller part has XPs installed on PC.
2002 May 23
2
PANIC: share_modes_identical
When 2.2.4 was released, I updated my cvs and did ./configure and make (no special options). Since I came in somewhat early today and nobody was around I did the make install. Everything ran fine until I tried to load a particular file and I'm receiving the following error and unable to open the file on a network share. If I place the file on a local drive it loads fine. Permissions and
2002 Sep 28
1
oplock problem - how to fix?
Hi everyone, Trying to copy a 3.5MB file from a Windows 2000 workstation to a FreeBSD 4.6.2 server running samba-2.2.6.p2. The 3.5MB file is an MS Access file called MoldFE.mdb. After a few seconds of copying the file, a message box pops up on the W2K workstation that states "Cannot copy MoldFE: The specified network name is no longer available". In /var/log/messages, I see this:
2001 Nov 16
1
CPU-load, memory-load, oplocks, smbd-core-dumps
Hi all, I use samba 2.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2 (1500 NT4 sp6a / w2k sp2 workstation). since i had updated from 2.0.7 to 2.2.2 the CPU load will very fast go to 100% an d teh memory use of a smbd process will grow up to 100 MB. In teh log-files are many errors like that: PANIC: open_mode_check: Existant process 22700 left active oplock smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(555) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock
2004 Mar 21
2
oplocks ?
I have follow ERROR Message in my log: [code] #cat samba.log.tn-ss1lxgxvomck [2004/03/21 13:34:32, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436) read_data: read failure for 45164. Error = Connection reset by peer [2004/03/21 13:39:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1011) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 4146 on port 1031 for dev = 1601, inode = 134,
2003 Apr 17
0
2.2.8 slows down to a crawl within a few days
We have been using samba for years now and are generally very happy. But since a recent upgrade to 2.2.8 we have seen samba slowing down periodically to a crawl every 2 or 3 days. BTW the start of these problems coincided with the upgrade to samba 2.2.8 and a partial cabling upgrade to 100 MBit, which also coincided with the introduction of the first Win XP Pro machines to our LAN. ;-( We have
2002 Feb 19
2
a good way of life
Thank you all for your answers. One told me that in order to allow the students to upload/download from their home directories, FTP or something like that is a simple and easy choice. As domain logon and roaming profil is not needed and FTP can be logged, I'll use this. Another question for our brillants candidates : How to batch the creation of a Samba account ? I mean, everytime you
2004 Sep 16
2
File locking in NFS on Solaris
Hello, System: Solaris 8/9 Samba: 3.02 and 3.06 We have problems with accessing files (from Windows XP) on a samba server that are mounted over nfs (on the server). Some users have symlinks in their home directories to nfs resources. When they try to copy file located in nfs the client simply hangs. To make the thing even stranger: Sometimes it also works (after restarting the samba server
2004 Dec 03
2
NFS mounted directory
Hi, Has anyone any ideas what is causing my smbd processes to crash? The files being accessed via samba are on an NFS mounted directory. In the samba log file I am getting the following errors: [2004/12/03 16:31:33, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1026) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2181 9 on port 53336 for dev = 2c00002, inode = 297939333
2001 Dec 15
0
oplock error - broken client? need workaround
Hi- I've used the same smb.conf for many such file servers: one big share the office can write to, share level, no passwords. But I've never had the following error, and can't find the same combo of errors on the web either. They are MS works 2000 databases. If a client opens one, then closes it, no other client can access the file (it will hang indefinitely) until the original