similar to: Need urgent help witch create mask rights

hi list, we recently saw the following weird behaviour on samba v3.0.13 with MacOSX panther and tiger as clients --setup-- [share1] path = /data valid users = @admins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode = 770 force directory mode = 2770 [share2] path = /data/folder valid users = @noadmins force user = administrator inherit permissions = yes force create mode

Hi all, I'm having some very weird issues with some users in a Samba ADS configuration. (:: kerberos logins seems to give users different rights/group memberships ::) Sysinfo: OS: Debian 3.0 + some backports packages Kernel: 2.4.24-1-686-smp (from backports.org) Samba: 3.0.2a (from debian packages fetched from samba) Filesystem: ext3 (no acl patches or acl support) Configuration

I am migrating a couple old RH servers running sendmail and UW-IMAP to a new Ubuntu 10.04 servers running Postfix and Dovecot. I have everything working reasonably well except that the permissions of newly created mbox mail folders is always 600. I have reviewed the archives, google, and double checked everything is as suggested in the Dovecot Wiki / SharedMailboxes / Permissions. I am

Is anyone out there using SIP Witch in conjunction with Asterisk? It claims to be able to "enhance existing IP-PBX solutions such as Asterisk", so maybe it can be used as a simple means to provide secure/encrypted calls. GNU SIP Witch - Summary <http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/sipwitch> GNU SIP Witch - GNU Telephony <http://www.gnutelephony.org/index.php/GNU_SIP_Witch>

Hi all, the filesystem ext4 is a buggy witch support of the acl? I optaid of the btrfs filesystem and i 'm very well. Marco -- It support specialist cell: 3388192313

hello, i ve a lot of probl?me with zaptel 1.4 when i tried to complile it under debian kernel 2.4; so i need to compile a new kernel version 2.6.x but id don't witch kernel version is stable van you help me please? :) Younss AZ KASTERISK.COM skype: younssiga

In allegated the files Il 29/01/2019 13:17, Rowland Penny ha scritto: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:01:06 +0100 > Marco Pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Witch your suggest the my problem persisted >> > Marco, Please either post the info I have asked for, or go away. > > There is something going on with your particular domain and without the

Rowald, one information: what filesystem do you use on the servers in production? Thanks a lot Marco Il 04/03/2019 18:50, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:35:50 +0100 > marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, the filesystem ext4 is a buggy witch support of the acl? I >> optaid of the btrfs filesystem and i

Classic debian 9 installated from netinstall. the ip 192.168.1.6 it is the machine (Classic debian 9 installated from netinstall) of the my active directory dc Il 29/01/2019 14:12, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:34:43 +0100 > Marco Pirola <mapirola81 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> In allegated the files >> >> Il 29/01/2019 13:17, Rowland

Hello, i have a SPA3102 and asterisk v. 1.2.18. I also hev a mysql database with cdr. Well all I want is to receive incoming calls from pstn on specified sip account (suppose 8000), and to initiate outgoing calls from all my asterisk sip accounts through SPA3102 device. Someone can explain me what may i set on SPA and asterisk to do this thing. Thank you for your support. -------------- next part

Hi everyone I installed Linux Conectiva 10 with SMP (SYMETRIC MULTIPROCESSORS) support - kernel 2.6.11.11 and the zaptel-1.0.7 modules. I got load the wcte11xp module no problems, but when I try to remove this, all the system crash, without any error message. With Kernel compiled to support just one processor, everything works fine (installation and remove of wcte11xp). I tested the wcfxs

I`m forgot paste rest of the log: dovecot: 2008-11-07 10:16:44 Panic: auth(default): file auth-worker-server.c: line 54 (auth_worker_idle_timeout): assertion failed: (array_count(&conn->requests) == 0)

hello everyone, I have this problem: I have a machine (debian9) that makes me a domain member. The partition where I create the shares supports acl. On a machine where windows 10 professional is installed where rsat is installed if I try to give a user permission to any known share that by logging on the domain member machine the user does not appear in the acl of the share. What should I do?

On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:19:45 +0100 marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > This is my smb.conf of the member of domain > > # Global parameters > [global] > security = ADS > workgroup = ROBINOOD > realm = ROBINOOD.TST > #dns forwarder = 192.168.1.6 > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > log level = 1 > vfs objects = acl_xattr > map acl

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 13:07:06 +0100 marco pirola <mapirola81 at gmail.com> wrote: > Does'nt work if i used Administration and another user. Can i > resolved this problem? I used the acl? > I think I understand what is going on and it clearly shows why giving 'Administrator' a Unix ID is a bad idea ;-) If you run: getent passwd administrator You will get something

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 06:59:45 +0100 Marco Pirola <mapirola81 at gmail.com> wrote: > This is the content of my smb.conf. Can you check if something is > missing? Otherwise I do not know how to behave anymore. Thanks and > have a good day. The only problem I can see is this line: valid user = +"domain users" You shouldn't set this line if using Windows ACL's Can

what information do you want to know? Among other things, I use google trnanslate as my English is basic Il giorno mar 29 gen 2019 alle ore 15:14 Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> ha scritto: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:33:11 +0100 > Marco Pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Classic debian 9 installated from netinstall. the ip

I'm from Brazil. I'm sorry, but my english is bad. When gone install the Samba, in my HP-UX 10.20, of the error, after of "./configure": checking configure sumary ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failue. Aborting config. Waiting the answer, Jorge Yuri de Lion Yamane - Bauru - Brazil

Witch your suggest the my problem persisted Il 29/01/2019 12:06, L.P.H. van Belle via samba ha scritto: > In addition to Rowlands answer. > > About . > [samba] > path = /samba/ > > What are the rights on /samba/ ? > My guess here, the rights on /samba does not allow you to set rights on that and subfolders. > > I also suggest, if you share a folder share a subfolder

On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 13:01:06 +0100 Marco Pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Witch your suggest the my problem persisted > Marco, Please either post the info I have asked for, or go away. There is something going on with your particular domain and without the info, we cannot begin to sort your problem. We are more than willing to try and help you, but without the