similar to: Slow eth0 Config

Further on this. I just ran an ethereal trace on an attempt to ping lserver1 from lserver1, and it appears that my DNS isn't staying local at all, but I have no idea what's gone wrong (other than my /etc/resolv.conf file). The trace (I'd include the relevant parts, but I can't get it to save anything in textual form) had lserver1.test.biz going out through the

One more thing I forgot to mention. The chapter calls for editing /etc/resolv.conf, but in my case it won't stay edited--it keeps getting set back to an original form (for searching my ISP) on every reboot. Thanks again. Eric Hines -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Samba-3 By Ex Chapt 3 Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:47:09 -0500 From: Eric Hines <eehines@comcast.net> To:

I've still not quite got things right. I'm running FC3 with Samba v 3.0.14a, and I'm trying to implement Example 2.4 from JHT's 2004 ed. of Samba-3 by Example. I have lserver1 as my Linux box and jupiter (user annlee) and mustelidae (ehines) as Win2k boxes. ehines has access to his share (path /archive/ehines (/archive/%U in smb.conf)), but annlee does not to her share

I have a 2Win2k, 1Linux (server) LAN; the server is running FC3 and Samba 3.0.14a. I am unable to get both users access to their individual shares. Essentially, I'm working through the Accounting Office example (pgs 31-35) of John Terpstra's 2004 Samba-3 By Example, and I'm doing something foolish and wrong on a basic level. I can get access to, and manipulate the files in, my

I'm running FC3 with Samba v 3.0.14a, and I'm trying to implement Example 2.4 from JHT's 2004 ed. of Samba-3 by Example. I have lserver1 as my Linux box and jupiter (user annlee) and mustelidae (ehines) as Win2k boxes. ehines has access to his share (path /archive/ehines (/archive/%U in smb.conf)), but annlee does not to her share (/archive/annlee). If I add annlee as a valid user

Hi, I am having the same problem. Did you figure out how to do this? Any help in how to remove stale WINS entries from Samba would be greatly appreciated. Cheers, -farshad

I'm hoping to use R for spatial analysis. In working through examples in Chapt. 4 of Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R I've come across the following error in trying to plot lines with the meuse data set. The text is verbatim from the book. > m.sl <- SpatialLines(list(Lines(list(Line(cc))))) Error in Lines(list(Line(cc))) : Single ID required What does "Single ID

Dumb question time; I can't find the answer in the Samba-3 or HOWTO docs: how do you add users to the passdb.tdb (tdbsam's db)? Is pdbedit the only way? I ask because the Chapt 3 Samba-3 example has passdb = tdbsam in the samba config file, but the instructions for adding users are to use useradd and smbpasswd, which leave passdb.tdb empty (except for root--I have no idea how that

I have setup a W2K client that uses a SuSE8.0 samba 2.2.5 server on the network. Samba is setup to use CUPS and as long as I print from W2K itself, there is no problems at all. It I try to copy a text file to a printer on the Samba server e.i. cp file \\lserver1\HP4000T nothing comes out of the printer and the following error message is written to /var/log/samba/log.smbd:

Hello, I'm new at linux and i appreciated is somebody could help me. I have installed the latest version af SAMBA on a Cobalt RAQ550. The SNMB and the NMBD daemons are running. However, when I want to access the swat pages http://192.168.5.240:901 <http://192.168.5.240:901/> There is noting found. Regards, Peter Discart

On 02/05/18 09:53, Michelle Kline wrote: > Hi Bert, > > That was distinctly unhelpful Not if you actually follow Bert's advice. > and your outward hostility to a field you > obviously don't understand reveals a regrettable level of ignorance. I didn't see any hostility to any field. Bert, like many of us, objects to people blithely and arrogantly applying possibly

John, This isn't entirely fair. There are three kinds of newbies, and I'll say for the purposes of this thread that newbies also may be new to Linux/UNIX, not just to Samba: the first kind is lazy and goes running for help at the drop of a bug and doesn't bother to read the docs first. This kind deserves your rant. The second kind doesn't know documentation exists--they

On Thu, September 21, 2017 6:13 pm, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:23:23PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Thu, September 21, 2017 12:42 pm, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> >> Than was my first reaction when I realized that logged in with GUI >> (X11) >> >> Yes, I can understand the rationale as above - if it is somebody's

WARNING: COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC -- Nothing to do with R. I thought readers of this list might enjoy the following. The link to the full article is at the bottom. I hope this is not "too" inappropriate. ------- Overconfidence in crime statistics doesn?t pay. In a new study, a team of criminologists makes the case that reported crime rates should acknowledge uncertainty in the data. The

As Scott said, nothing is perfect. On Ubuntu (16.04 - the current long term support version) all home directories are world executable/readable ("Security? What's that?"). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Robbins" <scottro11 at gmail.com> To: "centos" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 9:40:03 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS]

I realize this isn''t specifically a Rails question, but I figure others here will have encountered it. I have a client that wants form data to be saved when leaving a page. This could include leaving a page by following a link, closing a window, or pressing the back or forwards buttons. So ... I do some research, and found this Web page:

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:23:23PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, September 21, 2017 12:42 pm, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >> Than was my first reaction when I realized that logged in with GUI (X11) > > Yes, I can understand the rationale as above - if it is somebody's laptop. > Or someone's home computer. But it is arguable if it is centrally managed >

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 07:00:12PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, September 21, 2017 6:13 pm, Scott Robbins wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:23:23PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> > > > > Well, this is my longstanding rant against RedHat and friends. Take a > > look > > at what Fedora is doing before blithely throwing it into RedHat.

Ok, I'm stumped. I've got what appear to be 5 identical WNT workstation 4 sp3 machines. All have been configured to run off the primary domain controller (Samba 1.9.19). On one of these ONLY the domain logins generates a single popup window which says: Incorrect password or unknown username for \\machinename\C$ and presents them with a username/password dialog box. The users can

Since you bring up that topic (Samba4 not recommended as a file server), I've been meaning to ask on this list for a while: Why? I installed Samba4 2 years ago next month. I read then that recommendation in the wiki and took it literaly: not actual Samba shares. I followed the advice and we have two other different servers acting as actual "classic" Samba file servers. At the