Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "Notification of Undelivered Mail (VIS)"
2004 Jan 31
0
Undelivered Notification
A virus was detected in a message sent to:
daniel.bull@minterellison.com
With subject:
MAIL DELIVERY SYSTEM
This message has not been delivered and will be deleted by the Minter Ellison gateway.
Please ensure the virus is removed from the attachment before resending the message.
Details of the virus detected:
Scenarios/Incoming/Sophos Anti-Virus: Information 0x42060008, W32/MyDoom-A
2001 Jan 30
0
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender (fwd)
sending mail to samba-unsubscribe@us5.samba.org is looping/bouncing
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medi Montaseri medi@CyberShell.com
Unix Distributed Systems Engineer HTTP://www.CyberShell.com
CyberShell Engineering
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------- Forwarded
2008 Dec 05
0
GRUB Timeout problem Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
It looks like my message yesterday to the new mail server did not go
through, so I am sending this to the list again.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at mail.centos.org>
Date: Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:48 PM
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: lmmailinglists at gmail.com
This is the mail system at host mail.centos.org.
I'm
2010 Apr 07
2
[Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]
Dear list admin,
I'm really fed up with being treated regularly as a spammer and having
to unsubscribe every week from the spammer blacklist on the online form.
Niki Kovacs
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: MAILER-DAEMON at maiev.nerim.net (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:37:30 +0200
2019 Mar 17
0
LMTP: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender: User doesn't exist! :-(
> On 17 March 2019 13:14 Marek Kozlowski via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:
>
>
> :-)
>
> I'm using postfix for mail delivery and dovecot for mailbox access imaps
> pop3s.
>
> Postfix resolves, verifies and overwrites users' addresses by numerous
> subtle LDAP queries. However users are visible as local ones (openldap,
> pam, nss) in
2003 Jun 02
0
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender (PR#3158)
This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
--2F52F7EF1.1054526569/l3lx216.univ-lille3.fr
Content-Description: Notification
Content-Type: text/plain
This is the Postfix program at host l3lx216.univ-lille3.fr.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do
2019 Mar 17
2
LMTP: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender: User doesn't exist! :-(
:-)
I'm using postfix for mail delivery and dovecot for mailbox access imaps
pop3s.
Postfix resolves, verifies and overwrites users' addresses by numerous
subtle LDAP queries. However users are visible as local ones (openldap,
pam, nss) in the sense I can run `id' or `finger' queries and receive
replies.
Dovecot handles all mailboxes over imap/pop correctly with no
2006 Jun 18
2
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the SMTP Server program at host orange.fr.
I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more recipients. It''s attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The SMTP Server
2012 Aug 30
0
Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
This is the mail system at host mail1.ardenthealth.com.
I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It''s attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail
2005 Jul 08
1
Undelivered mail
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: multipart/report
Size: 1191 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20050708/0b390ebc/attachment.bin
2004 Jan 27
0
Undelivered mail: MAIL TRANSACTION FAILED
Dear User,
the message with following attributes has not been delivered,
because contains an infected object.
Sender = samba@samba.org (may be forged)
Recipients = mailer-daemon@inetforce.com.ua
Subject = MAIL TRANSACTION FAILED
Message-ID = i0RDVRlh033718
Antivirus filter report:
--- Dr.Web report ---
Following virus(es) has been found:
infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768
Dr.Web detailed
2004 Jan 27
0
Undelivered mail: hi
Dear User,
the message with following attributes has not been delivered,
because contains an infected object.
Sender = samba@lists.samba.org (may be forged)
Recipients = marketing@microstar.ru
Subject = hi
Message-ID = [unknown-id]
Antivirus filter report:
--- Dr.Web report ---
Following virus(es) has been found:
infected with Win32.HLLM.MyDoom.32768
Dr.Web detailed report:
2004 Feb 24
0
Undelivered mail: something for you
Dear User,
the message with following attributes has not been delivered,
because contains an infected object.
Sender = samba@samba.org (may be forged)
Recipients = blizz@rtf-15.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua
Subject = something for you
Message-ID = i1OK4sac009347
Antivirus filter report:
--- Dr.Web report ---
Following virus(es) has been found:
infected with Win32.HLLM.Foo.41984
Dr.Web detailed report:
2004 May 25
0
Undelivered mail: Hurts
Dear User,
the message with following attributes has not been delivered,
because contains an infected object.
Sender = samba@samba.org (may be forged)
Recipients = vladislav.smirnov@yabloko.ru
Subject = Hurts
Message-ID = [unknown-id]
Antivirus filter report:
--- Dr.Web report ---
Following virus(es) has been found:
infected with Win32.HLLM.Netsky.17920
Dr.Web detailed report:
2008 Aug 06
1
bug submitting bug? [Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]
(A) I received the following bounced message when I tried to submit a
bug from http://bugs.r-project.org/cgi-bin/R
(B) The bug report itself is at the bottom.
Thanks,
Chris
(A)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 17:08:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: MAILER-DAEMON at pubhealth.ku.dk (Mail Delivery System)
To: candrews at buffalo.edu
2003 Jul 31
1
Rsync not connecting
Hi All
I am using the following command to update data from one server to another
one. But it is
returning back with error.
Without SSH:
[root@pc165017 var]# rsync -ae /var/www pc165002.napier.ac.uk:/var/www
Failed to exec /var/www : Permission denied
rsync error: error in IPC code (code 14) at util.c(162)
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync
2006 Aug 29
2
Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
by the way, how come the list got another "mail delivery system" email
whenever i sent a post?...weird...
On 8/30/06, Mail Delivery System
<MAILER-DAEMON@mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn> wrote:
> This is the Postfix program at host mx3-83.sinamail.sina.com.cn.
>
> I''m sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients.
1999 Jun 25
2
Machine Upgraded & smbd/nmbd won't start
Hi all. Running 2.0.4b on a (now) solaris 2.6 box. Since the upgrade the
smbd & nmbd daemons won't start. I tried starting smbd by hand, running
it through truss. Here's the last few lines:
getuid() = 0 [0]
fstat(3, 0xEFFFF858) = 0
write(3, " [", 1) = 1
write(3, " 1 9 9 9 / 0
1999 Jun 02
1
nmbd errors on console
I get the following errors on the console of my newly installed 2.0.4b
server on a Sun E4000:
nmbd/nmbd_packets.c: (1412)
find_subnet_for_nmb_packet: response record not found for response id
<num>.
nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c: (240)
find_response_record: response packet id <num> received with no matching
record
I don't know the internals well enough to decipher these, can
2000 Aug 21
1
[homes] vs [homes$]
Hi all. Is it possible to have a generic share like [homes] that hides
all user home dir shares by default by appending a "$" to them? I'd
search the archives but they have not yet been tx'd. I realise there is
"browse vs nobrowse" but I specifically need to have end users map to
\\srv\user$ rather than \\srv\user.
--
Mark