similar to: local users can't access a shared folder when samba is joined in the domain.

Hello, I have a problem when uploading file to samba server when the share's volume is under lvm snapshot. I always got "The specified network name is no longer available", this happens when uploading large files like 500MB and the volume has a lvm snapshot(even 1 snapshot). If there are no snapshots, everything is ok, I can transfer large files without problem. my client is

Hi all, In my win2k ADS server(mixed mode), I have set the LAN Manager authentication level to Send NTLMv2 response only\refuse LM & NTLM. In the registry, i also set HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa|lmcompatibilitylevel --> level 5 (accepts only NTLMv2). Similarly, i also set HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\MSV1_0\NtlmMinClientSec --> 0x00080000(NTLMv2 Session

On 25/04/16 08:52, Alexandre Klein wrote: > Matthias, > > Sorry I should have wrote more details. > I agree with your message and I understand that template12 is not meant to > be a share. > > What I tried to say is: > > when I have this configuration: > [template12] > writable = yes > browsable = yes > valid users = alex > > [alex] >

How to use copy: [template12] writable = yes browsable = yes valid users = andy, dave, jay [share1] path=/path/to/share1 copy = template12 [share2] path=/path/to/share2 copy = template12 Here template12 is a template and it used later for declaring shares share1 and share2. template (or in my example template12) is not meant to be used as a share because a share is a

Thank you for your message. I was not sure if the example (from here https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch06.html) was incorrect or if I was missing something. Alexandre Klein Tanuki Software, Ltd. 6-18-10-4F Nishi-Kasai, Edogawa-ku Tokyo 134-0088 Japan Tel: +81-3-3878-3211 Fax: +81-3-3878-0313 http://www.tanukisoftware.com On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny

Matthias, Sorry I should have wrote more details. I agree with your message and I understand that template12 is not meant to be a share. What I tried to say is: when I have this configuration: [template12] writable = yes browsable = yes valid users = alex [alex] path = /home/alex copy = template12 I can see this error in /var/log/samba/log/smbd [2016/04/25 16:44:14.719192,

I am having trouble with the %S Macro being expanded to an unexpected value. We have a section of disk where each directory under that directory is to be it's own share. This looks like: /export/ /export/share1 /export/share2 . . /export/shareN Rather than listing each share uniquely in the smb.conf, we put this in the global section: default service = export along with all of our

[global] workgroup = example realm = example.test netbios name = server1 server role = active directory domain controller log file = /var/log/samba/smbd.log server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate domain logons = Yes wins support = Yes security = user preferred master = auto domain master = yes local master = yes unix extensions = no

On 20/03/2023 16:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 20/03/2023 16:22, Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder >> after configuration of a share. >> >> My folders look like: >> /var/folder1/folder2/ >> >> I created share1 on folder1 and

Hey all, well, first of all (even if it's quite late as it's in version 3.0.7 already): thanks a lot to all who are developing and supporting Samba! I'm new to Linux and I really like the way things are happening on this OS. But now, I've reached a point where I have to raise the white flag... It seems to me like - at least my - software raid can't dance Samba. I've got

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba

Hi all, if I put max connections = 5 in the homes section, does this mean that only 5 users can login to their home directory simultaneously? [homes] comment = %u's personal share folder browsable = NO read only = NO map archive = YES case sensitive = no sync always = yes hide dot files = no max connections = 5 besides homes, max connections is working, but in homes looks like this is not

Hi, I'd like to accomplish te following but can't seem to find how: Share1 subdir1 subdir2 Share 1 that is connected by our Windows clients, should NOT be writable directly. This means, nobody (except a specified group/user?) should be able to create a top-level folder or file in this share. Write and execute rights through the subdir1 and subdir2 should however be left alone and

Hello, After upgrading to Samba 4.11 (from 4.10) I noticed that python scripts using tempfile.mkstemp fail when run against samba cifs mounts. Before I submit a bug report, could someone else try this out so it's not just my setup? How to reproduce: 1. Mount a Samba 4.11 share using the mount command: mount //server1/share /tmp/share1 2. Run python script that is using mkstemp: import

I have a need to setup the recycle vfs object on our server. On my test server, I have all of the shares on a single drive and have put the following into each share: vfs_objects = recycle recycle:repository = [Actual Path and Partition that the share is located] recycle:directory_mode = 770 recycle:keeptree = Yes recycle:touch_mtime = Yes recycle:versions = Yes It works like a charm. All

Is the issue below addressed in 3.0.25b? (no freebsd port available yet so I'm still at 3.0.25a) I can't see anything specifically about this in the release notes. I just want to add that I've also seen this behaviour on a windows xp x64 client. It's a pretty serious problem.. so I'm also thinking I may have to revert to an earlier version if it doesn't look like a

Hi Everybody, I was wondering if a few of you might be able to send some brainpower my way regarding a problem I've been having. My Samba 3 server serves OGG files to serveral Windows XP clients, all on the same subnet. As "user_a", I've been ripping OGGs on one windows box and saving them to /home/user_a/ on the server. I can then copy these files from user_a's home

Hello, everyone, I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior across SMB clients when configuring shares using the "msdfs proxy" parameter, and was hoping to get some advice from the community on this. My issue is that various SMB clients seem to behave differently when this parameter is pointed as a path that includes a sub-folder under the root share. So, given the following share

Hello, First of all I would like to thank the Samba Project Group for this state of the art software. I would like to thank every body for helping each other out. Please ignore my poor English writing. It is not my native language. Although: I do the best I can. We use Samba for a while now. We started with version 4.0.6 and updated each time. Now we are at version 4.0.9 and we are planning to

Hello all, after spending the last days fighting and researching I hope someone can point me to an solution here. Even if I am using Debian / Ubuntu since years I wouldn?t consider myself as a Linux professional. I have some experience though. What I try to accomplish: - Centrally administrated groups for file services. Right now it is only one server but there will be more. Setup: - System