similar to: Samba "spamming" Windows ADS server event logs with "pre-authentication failure"?

I am running Samba ver 3.0.37 on Solaris 10 (sparc) as a PDC with LDAP for the backend for both samba and unix accounts. Assume the samba SMBPDC is called "PDC." I have also set up a trust with an Windows domain- lets call it WINDOMAIN- (the PDC for the Windows domain is Win 2003 but is in mixed mode for backwards compat.) The SAMBA domain trusts the WINDOWS domain, not not vice

I am stumped here. I am a novice at using samba to do MS Active Directory stuff, but I have read everything I could find in the HOWTO collection and on the linux.samba cache of the list and am still stuck. A bit of background... I have set up a Windows 2003 server as a domain controller here and configured it to be the DNS for a ficticious domain for internal use only. The domain functional

I am running Samba ver 3.0.33 on Solaris 10 (sparc) as a PDC with LDAP for the backend for both samba and unix accounts. I have also set up a trust with an Windows domain- lets call it WINDOMAIN- (the PDC for the Windows domain is Win 2003 but is in mixed mode for backwards compat.) The SAMBA domain trusts the WINDOWS domain, not not vice versa. I had also tried setting up trusts with

Hi! I am using mainly Samba 3.5 on CentOS, and I was very pleased with idmap_rid backend for SID-to-RID mappings. But on Solaris 10, I can only use 3.6 because OpenCSW ships only 3.6. Problem is, things are changed and are not working as expected... Here is my config on RHEL Samba 3.5: [global] workgroup = WINDOMAIN realm = WINDOMAIN.LOCAL server string = localserver

net use z: \\sambapdc\share1 <file:///\\sambapdc\share1> However I still get prompted for a user name and password. I don't seem to have a way to force the "net" command to connect anonymously. If I can force an anonymous connection from Windows, then I should be OK. (Again, this share does not contain information that needs much protection.) Thanks

net use z: \\sambapdc\share1 <file:///\\sambapdc\share1> However I still get prompted for a user name and password. I don't seem to have a way to force the "net" command to connect anonymously. If I can force an anonymous connection from Windows, then I should be OK. (Again, this share does not contain information that needs much protection.) Thanks From:

Hello ! Is it possible to configure dovecot so it can use SQL authentication for set of domains, and ntlm authentication for one domain? In other words, I would like to authenticate all users (with user at domain.com as login) in SQL server, and if not found, then strip @windomain.com from login and fallback to pam->winbind authentication. So far i have in my dovecot.conf: auth_default_realm

Hello, i've having this logs ever since ai started samba on a new server.... it's a sles 10 server wich is supposed to be a part of a w2k3 domain, here's the conf file: workgroup = windomain map to guest = Bad User printcap name = cups logon path = \\%L\profiles\.msprofile logon drive = P: add machine script = /usr/sbin/useradd -c Machine -d /var/lib/nobody -s /bin/false %m$ logon

I am running a Samba 3.6.20 for my primary domain controller (+ main file server) and my back up domain controller. Each domain controller has an LDAP backend- the LDAP servers configured for multimaster replication. I have domain trusts established with a Windows 2003 AD domain ("WINDOMAIN") . I have enabled nested groups in smb.conf. Winbind is enabled to support

Hi Denis, Thanks for help! After trying several things out I finally worked it out ;-) No I can connect with the useres from my WinDomain to the samba server - that's fine But: How do I create vald shares for the several groups? How can I set the rights for the different folders for different Windows-users & Windows-groups? Has this be done on windows or on linux? I just tried to set

Hi there, I’m new to this mailing list but I have a special question to you. This older post https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-June/200271.html describes exactly my problem. In my case I do not upgraded the samba version. It is a fresh installation on a Ubuntu server box. The samba version is: Version 4.3.11-Ubuntu The winbindd version is: Version 4.3.11-Ubuntu I use samba/winbindd

On 3/27/2018 11:45 AM, Tom via samba wrote: > Hi there, > > I’m new to this mailing list but I have a special question to you. > This older post https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-June/200271.html describes exactly my problem. > > In my case I do not upgraded the samba version. It is a fresh installation on a Ubuntu server box. > The samba version is: Version

Hello. I am in a trouble. ActiveDirectory(joind Domain Users in secoundry group) user can not use terminal in X. If use,X session is freeze. But,ActiveDirectory(not joind Domain Users in secoundry group) user can use terminal in X. X session is not freeze. Why? anyone,please tell me how to work well. (That is,X session is not freeze evenif ActiveDirectory is joind Domain Users in secoundry

Hi all I'm interesting in using Samba shares with Microsoft AD in following way: I would like to set up my shares on Samba 3.6.3, authenticate Windows users via ActiveDirectory and have users/groups access to those shares configured in ActiveDirectory (not in smb.conf). Is that possible? I did fair amount of research but I could not find enough information or tutorial how to do it. Do I need

Hi, When validating users on my Linux system against an ActiveDirectory, the Windows event log are filled with messages like these (Windows Event ID 675): Pre-authentication failed: User Name: linux$ User ID: KK\linux$ Service Name: krbtgt/KK.LOCAL Pre-Authentication Type: 0x0 Failure Code: 0x19 Client

On 14/02/16 19:40, Rowland penny wrote: > On 14/02/16 03:38, Stuart Longland wrote: >> It doesn't seem to join without me putting that entry in /etc/hosts. I >> haven't tried removing it (following the domain join) to see if it still >> works. >> >> What is the correct procedure here? > > It all depends on how your Unix workstations get their dns

Hello. Yes, it is possible. 2017-03-20 13:19 GMT-03:00 Moby <list at mobsternet.com>: > Thanks Edson, so the Samba member server will work fine even if we > increase the activedirectory domain functional level to 2016? > > Regards, > --Moby > > > On 3/19/2017 21:10, edson wrote: > > There is no problem if the samba server is a member server. But if it is >

On 3/20/2017 04:13, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:28:37 -0500 > Moby via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Can Samba 4.2.X work as a member server in a Windows server 2016 >> activedirectory domain? I am using Samba member servers in Windows >> 2012R2 domain and would like to know if I can upgrade the domain to >> functional level

Oops! Thought I'd CC'd this to the list. Sorry, Oliver! Chris -------- Original Message -------- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:09:35 +0100 From: Chris Wakelin <c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk> To: Jeroen Scheerder <Jeroen.Scheerder at phil.uu.nl> CC: Chris Wakelin <c.d.wakelin at reading.ac.uk> Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot and ActiveDirectory Jeroen Scheerder wrote: >

Valery, That's pretty cute actually. Do you want this "brilliant" :) example in the cvs repository? I'd be happy to put it in. Reid. Valery A.Khamenya wrote: > Hi LLVMers, > > the example attached I have used to prove that JIT and some visible > optimizations are really invoked. > > Proved OK. I got 30% speed-up in comparison to gcc 3.3.3 >