similar to: Re: nazi spam in German over list address

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "Re: nazi spam in German over list address"

2005 May 17
1
Re: nazi spam in German over list address
> -----Original Message----- > From: JLB [mailto:jlb@twu.net] > I'd go further and cut down on membership to people emailing from > non-Windows systems (including Webmail systems, until someone > invents a worm that spreads through those...) Okay, I'm sorry, but that's the dumbest idea yet. If they didn't have Windows, why would they use Samba?
2005 May 16
0
Re: nazi spam in German over list address
It is mostly the Sober.Q worm, a new Sober variant that has come out that is causing all of the trouble. Been getting quite a bit at work but it has all been tagged as spam. More info at http://news.com.com/Sober.Q+spreads+hate+messages+in+German,+English/210 0-7349_3-5708588.html > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+marki=cumcmemphis.org@lists.samba.org >
2005 May 15
4
Re: nazi spam in German over list address
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:00 +0200, Lars Grobe wrote: > Hi, > > whoever is able to unsubscribe addresses from the list: I am currently > getting lots of spam with nazi content over this mailing list. Unfortunately we are all to well aware of this problem, but as the long- standing policy of samba.org lists is to allow public posting, we are between a rock and a hard place. This has
2008 Jan 06
2
I am confused. Chmod / chown issues?
Where did I go wrong? [root at mail busdev]# stat . File: `.' Size: 4096 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 32768 Directory Device: ah/10d Inode: 147591 Links: 5 Access: (0750/drwxr-x---) Uid: (56755/ busdev) Gid: (56755/ busdev) Access: 2008-01-06 15:49:53.000000000 -0500 Modify: 2008-01-06 15:49:15.000000000 -0500 Change: 2008-01-06 15:59:59.000000000 -0500 [root at
2004 Jan 12
2
W2k/SQL Authentication problems 3.0.1, help please
I upgraded from Samba 2.2.8a to Samba 3.0.1, since doing I'm having problems with my SQL Server and applications running on Windows 2000. When a users (running a windows 98 client) attempts to query the SQL Server, either using ODBC (even the Test Sources) or an application that uses the db. I get a login failed from the sql app, and from the ODBC I get: "Login failed for user
2014 Sep 05
1
FW: Dell basic Server SR# 898596786 SVTG: 3CJM1P1 <<#2039741-9051508#>>
That's problem. AHCI is the standard for SATA, running modern SATA drives, especially SSD require the AHCI command structure. Running modern SATA drives in IDE (ATA) mode is not readily supported. -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc.
2016 Sep 22
0
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement
I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it is down at the FAQ level) do I run it by the Board? In other words, where do I discuss this? I will send the 2 vpats from my .gov account in a moment. -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Karanbir Singh > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 17:07 > > Did you
2016 Sep 22
0
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement
Jason, Please let me know if you need any additional help with this request. I agree that a Centos 7 VPAT should be publicized. On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org > >
2016 Sep 22
3
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pdinc.us] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 > To: 'centos-devel at centos.org' > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >
2016 Sep 22
1
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement
let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it
2016 Sep 22
2
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement
Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
2013 May 05
1
Why?? NFS cached permissions groups etc
An hour of my life disapeared and my beautiful uptime was rebooted and it was fixed by reading http://serverfault.com/questions/98900/is-a-reboot-required-to-refresh-permissio ns-after-adding-a-user-to-a-new-group #/home is mounted from a NFS export [jpyeron at node000 ~]$ cat /tmp/jobs/foo.txt ~jobs/test.txt ~jobs/userstest.txt afasdasd cat: /home/jobs/test.txt: Permission denied Sun May 5
2007 Feb 17
1
Reply-To header
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:16 -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > > I see you've added a Reply-To header later. The canonical response in > > this case is for someone to reference: > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > Yes, I've read that page. It says basically that it makes replying > privately to the sender difficult. I'm sure it does, but
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >
2016 Sep 22
1
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement
I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org > [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39 > To: centos-docs at centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 > compliancestatement > > Can my
2007 Jun 10
0
UNICOM, Video Conferencing in Pakistan http://www.unicom.net.pk/
UNICOM, Video Conferencing in Pakistan http://www.unicom.net.pk/ We at Unicom are pleased to inform you that we have expanded our network of video conferencing studios in all major cities of Pakistan including Karachi, Lahore, Peshawar, Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Quetta, Hayderabad, Nawabshah, Muzafarabad, Sialkot and now in Faisalabad and Gujrawala . All of our studio are equipped with professional
2004 Oct 08
1
ads_connect: Connection refused
when I exec the net group command to list the groups, i get a cryptic error message, the a group listing. what is ads_connect, and what would an error from it mean? then I can work on fixing it. [root@testserver /]# net group root's password: [2004/10/08 11:44:46, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(183) ads_connect: Connection refused Linux Admins Domain Admins Domain Guests Domain Users
2014 Dec 04
2
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:41 -0500, Jason Ricles wrote: > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. I would recommend RHEL for critical systems or those that must be certified for a particular purpose, such as CA servers.
2015 Feb 18
6
[Bug 11101] New: support writing to devices
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101 Bug ID: 11101 Summary: support writing to devices Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: jpyeron at
2015 Feb 18
0
Intermittent problem, likely disk IO related - mptscsih: ioc0: attempting task abort!
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Jason Pyeron <jpyeron at pdinc.us> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Murphy >> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 20:48 >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> >> I'd post the entire dmesg somewhere >> > >> >