similar to: msdfs not working on netbios aliases?

Hello Jeremy, I think you missed a "/" in: mount --bind /share1/DVR /medium/DVR mount --bind /share1/Audio /medium/Audio mount --bind /share2/Video /medium/Video mount --bind /share2/Backups /medium/Backups BR, Matt On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba

A sysadmin moved a share from one Windows server to another. I am now getting error 13 when trying to mount the share from the new server. The following worked before the server was replaced: mount.cifs //ipaddress1/share1$ /mnt/share1 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,rw mount.cifs //ipaddress2/share2$ /mnt/share2 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,ro Change: server

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the following is possible I need 2 Samba Shares for example share1 and share2, both sharing an identical location, however I want once PC to connect using share1 and everyone else to use share2 so far so good this works. However, at 1am in the morning I want to stop share2 and disconnect users whilst not effecting access via share1. Then at 2am restart share2.

Dear, all. I am pulling my hair because I could not find any error messsages that could point me to a fix to my problem. The directory I want to share was mounted on /home with drbd and heartbeat but then my users could not access any shares / their home directories. However, if I set up shares else where on my box like share under /opt or /usr/local, then the same users would be able to access

I haven?t used Samba for over a decade and, from what I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. I have the following directories I want to share through Samba: /share1/DVR /share1/Audio /share2/Video /share2/Backups /share1 is on

List, I'm having trouble accessing shares, and I'm getting conflicting indications on whether I've successfully joined the domain with my PC and Samba server (which may bear on the share problem). I really could use some help; I've not been able to recognize anything in the docs or via Google that helps. I'm running SUSE 9.3 and Samba 3.0.21a, and I'm trying to

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba

On 20/03/2023 16:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 20/03/2023 16:22, Thomas Hoffmann (Speed4Trade GmbH) via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder >> after configuration of a share. >> >> My folders look like: >> /var/folder1/folder2/ >> >> I created share1 on folder1 and

Hello, i got a msdfs share running and now i want to hide folders from users who got no access to them anyway. For example: List of shares: test1 test2 User sees only: test1 Is something like that possible mit samba itself or does someone know a workaround to get it running like that ? Thanks for any ideas. A.Dura

> Date: 30 Nov 1998 20:22:27 GMT > From: mathog@seqaxp.bio.caltech.edu > To: mlist-samba@nntp-server.caltech.edu > Subject: W95/98 connect to any SMB share as another user? > Message-ID: <73uuq3$s7j@gap.cco.caltech.edu> > > map H: as \\machine1\share1 as username=John, password=JohnsPassword map > M: as \\machine2\share2 as username=Jane, password=JanesPassword >

Good morning. I am using samba 3.0 on RedHat Linux 9.0 and Linux machine is having lot of users and groups . I am trying to solve a problem. I have created, for example, 10 shares ( each share is having different valid users and groups ) and I can access only 4 of them (I have rights to read or write only for 4 shares). Well, is it possible to hide to my browsing the 6 shares that I can not

I have 2 different shares one with [Share1] valid users = @"DOMAINA+Domain Users" [Share2] valid users = @"DOMAINA+SpecialGroup" Members of the latter group cannot access Share2. No one can. #getent group |grep Special DOMAINA+SpecialGroup:x:10001:DOMAINA+User1,DOMAINA+User2,DOMAINA+User3 #wbinfo -g |grep Special DOMAINA+SpecialGroup I changed the

I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10. I currently have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to 'ads' for improved authentication. I have one snag, though... I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows domain that is not in my control. There is no trust relationship at all. If I use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid

Matthias, Sorry I should have wrote more details. I agree with your message and I understand that template12 is not meant to be a share. What I tried to say is: when I have this configuration: [template12] writable = yes browsable = yes valid users = alex [alex] path = /home/alex copy = template12 I can see this error in /var/log/samba/log/smbd [2016/04/25 16:44:14.719192,

I make all steps in the guide: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/install.html#id2546028 but command (exetuded in the same computer where is samba): smbclient //fc9/tester -Utester%test gives error: Domain=[DZTI] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.2.0-17.fc9] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME The user tester have been created by commands: useradd tester smbpasswd -a

Hello, I am running the following OS CentOS 5.2 Samba Release samba-3.0.28 Kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22 (latest from CentOS) I also tried compiling a custom kernel with the experimental MSDFS option in kernel version 2.6.28.7 to no avail. Microsoft Server OS Windows Server 2003 R2 My Samba server has winbind enabled and the following smb.conf configuration. [global] socket options =

Hi, until now the users here did access the samba shares directly via \\server\share. The number of shares is rising and it should now be possible to access shares by the department they belong to. Thus the users need only one drive letter and not many in their windows explorer. To accomplish this I tried the msdfs approach and it's working very nicely. on serverA: share1 ->

I need to mount a share I don't have direct access to only to one subdirectory. I have no problems mounting other shares on the same windows server with the same permissions. I can mount the volume through gnome "Connect to Server...", but I need it on the filesystem. What is working: smbmount //server1/share1 /mnt -o -fstype=cifs -noperm,credentials=/etc/auto.smb.server1 What is

Hello all, I have an NFS Server where I want give access to a specific address to a specific path. Problem is that I have some other shares active which I do not want the specific IP to not access it. The /etc/exports looks like the following: /nfs/Share1??? ??? ???? 10.10.*(rw) /nfs/Share2?? ? ??????? 10.10.*(rw) /kdnbckp/CS21?????????? 10.10.193.43(rw) The client on the last line (IP

Hi all, I have a (simple?) question about groups. this is my scenario: Windows Active directory domain Samba file server ADS integrated 2 shares on this last server (share1, share2) 2 groups on the AD (group1 and group2) First share is only fully available to group1: this is easily done second share is fully available to group2 --- Then I have some users belonging to both group1 and