Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "Samba 3.0.10-1.4E and RedHat Enterprise 4."
2005 May 02
0
Samba 3.0.10-1.4E and RedHat ES 4.0
I have successfully, well somewhat successfully, joined a native Windows
2003 Active Directory domain as a domain member. The "home" domain has
a two-way trust relationship with another domain in the same Forest.
The Samba server can provide proper access to any object within it's
"home" domain, however, I am having difficulty providing access to the
Samba server share(s)
2005 May 05
0
Trusted Domain's users not authenticating properly.
I have a Samba-3, v3.0.10-1.4E installation on RedHat Enterprise 4. The
server has successfully joined a Native Windows 2003 Active Directory
Domain as a member. All users within the Samba server's domain
authenticat successfully via AD and can access Samba shares on this
server fine. When running the wbinfo -t command it is successful. The
wbinfo -m command lists 14 trusted domains and
2006 Jul 13
1
Redhat samba-3.0.10-1.4E.6-x86_64
Dear List Members
We are currently using samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2-x86_64 on RedHat AS 4. And
it seems that we are suffering of the same problems reported here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-April/104335.html
problems with the service pack 1 for windows 2003
[2005/04/25 02:06:33, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_bind_req(993)
api_pipe_bind_req: unknown auth type 1 requested.
2016 Oct 21
0
anonymous function parsing bug?
Are you saying that
f1 <- function(x) log(x)
f2 <- function(x) { log } (x)
should act differently?
Using 'return' complicates the matter, because it affects evaluation, not
parsing.
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thx for the reply. Unfortunately
2005 Oct 19
0
AW: Re: samba-3.0.10-1.4E (RHEL4); Invalid key XXX given to dptr_close
Fabian,
Fast explains.
On the NT server work BrightStore with version r9, more highly does not go
because of NT.
On the REHL4 side works (worked) BrightStore Linux Client r11.5. Smaller
version does not work goes because of RHEL4.
BrightStore servers r9 and Linux Client r11.5 are not compatible
unfortunately.
I must now decide everything with the version Share to work to get.
Or the operating
2006 Sep 29
1
samba in centos 4.4: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9 versus the latest from sernet samba3-3.0.23c-30
Hi people.
I use centos on many my servers and they are running samba which comes
with centos: samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9
From samba-3.0.10 to 3.0.23c many thnigs in code had change. Many bug
fixes etc., code rewrote (for example oplock in later version of samba
than 3.0.10). RedHat people don't have made a full of backports to their
samba, only security things.
So I have question, what do
2016 Oct 21
3
anonymous function parsing bug?
Hi,
thx for the reply. Unfortunately that is not a simplified version of the
problem. You have a function, call it and get the result (numeric in,
numeric out in that case). For simplicity lets use the "return" case:
##
foobar<-function(x) { return(sqrt(x)) }(2)
##
which is a function (numeric in, numeric out) which is defined, then
gets called and the return value is a function
2005 Oct 19
1
samba-3.0.10-1.4E (RHEL4); Invalid key XXX given to dptr_close
Hi List,
need your help, property the here following.
OS / Samba = samba-3.0.10-1.4E (RHEL4)
Error message in Samba logfile = Invalid key XXX given to dptr_close
This message comes then if by NT server with BrighStore a Backup is started.
The Backup is made by a Share.
all the same with or without
kernel oplocks = no
level2 oplocks = no
oplocks = no
without success
Info:
Error Log from
2016 Oct 21
0
anonymous function parsing bug?
Here is a simplified version of your problem
> { sqrt }(c(2,4,8))
[1] 1.414214 2.000000 2.828427
Do you want that to act differently?
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 6:10 AM, Wilm Schumacher <wilm.schumacher at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired behaviour
> of my R
2016 Oct 21
0
anonymous function parsing bug?
Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap:
>
> Are you saying that
f1 <- function(x) log(x)
f2 <- function(x) { log } (x)
should act differently?
yes.
But that would mean that {log} would act differently than log.
I suppose it is a matter of taste, but I say yuck.
As for 'return', don't use it if you want readable code. It is
like a goto but worse. It
2005 Oct 02
1
XP SP2 connecting to 3.0.10-1.4E
I have been running our companies XP Pro systems on our Samba domain
controller (version: 3.0.10-1.4E) with local administrative rights up to
this point. Everything has worked fine.
We are getting larger now and I'd like to make the logins locally
restricted (I want them to have XP's "Users" rights and "Remote Desktop
Users" only). When I restrict the accounts
2003 Feb 18
1
SAMBA and root entry
hi all,
I am trying to add an entry for root using samba-2.2.7 and Directory
Server for LDAP.
I use the command "smbpasswd -a root" and I get this error:
[root@sysad2 root]# smbpasswd -a root
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
LDAP search "(&(uid=root)(objectclass=sambaAccount))" returned 0 entries.
failed to modify user with uid = root with: Object class
2005 Nov 29
1
Superimpose Histograms
Hi all,
I have data which is represented as a histogram and want to add more
data / another histogram to this plot using another color. That is I
need to superimpose multiple histograms.
But have no idea how to do this.
Can anybody please give me a hint?
Thanks,
Andreas
--
Andreas Wilm
Institut fuer Physikalische Biologie
Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf
2007 Feb 22
0
Lastest upgrade of smb on RedHat doesn't work
The latest upgrade of from samba 3.0.9 to samba 3.0.10 has caused
problems on my samba server.
On the Windows computers you can no longer see the WINS server ( the
RedHat server) in the Network Neighborhood, say server1. The
printers that we have added through the network neighborhood no
longer work.
One has to search for the full name of the server
( server1.xxx.xxx.edu) with the
2005 Oct 18
1
samba-3.0.10-1.4E (RHEL4): logon failures with 2003 server pdc
I recently set up a new RHEL4 server with samba-3.0.10 in a Windows 2003
server PDC domain.
I can log on as one user from different workstations on to the new samba
server. With several other users, I get this error:
Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: krb5_rd_req(CIFS/samba-server@MY.DOM) failed: Wrong principal in request
Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: [2005/10/18 16:41:34,
2006 Feb 09
1
CentOS 4.2 - Samba 3.0.10-1.4E.2 - Long Filenames Issue
Hi
Got a call from a customer who has a mixed OSX and MS shop. They are
having issues with a new fileserver box i installed for them. All seems
well but when they copy files with long names onto the box it fails with
"Filename too long" or something like that (i'm relying on what the
customer is saying to me)
They are using a G5 with Panther i believe to so this so anyone seen
2014 Aug 07
2
Global number of matches
Hi,
is there a way to get the number of all possible matches for a specific
query?
Some api call like
Xapian::doccount Xapian::Enquire::get_number_of_matches();
Best wishes
Wilm
2016 Oct 21
3
anonymous function parsing bug?
Hi,
I hope this is the correct list for my question. I found a wired
behaviour of my R installation on the evaluation of anonymous functions.
minimal working example
###
f<-function(x) {
print( 2*x )
}(2)
class(f)
f(3)
f<-function(x) {
print( 2*x )
}(4)(5)
f(6)
###
leads to
###
> f<-function(x) {
+ print( 2*x )
+ }(2)
>
> class(f)
[1] "function"
2008 Nov 24
2
handling a matrix and .C
Hello R-devel,
I want to write extensions for R in C (maybe C++ and Fortran later) and it works fine, but there is one problem, which I cannot solve (in my view).
I want to handle a matrix from R in C. For arrays there is "as.double(...)", but nothing for a matrix.
I searched a while, but didn't find something.
Last I looked at the source code of e1071 and of the core itself and
2016 Oct 21
3
anonymous function parsing bug?
Hi,
Am 21.10.2016 um 18:10 schrieb William Dunlap:
> Are you saying that
> f1 <- function(x) log(x)
> f2 <- function(x) { log } (x)
> should act differently?
yes. Or more precisely: I would expect that. "Should" implies, that I
want to change something. I just want to understand the behavior (or
file a bug, if this would have been one).
As I wrote, in e.g.