similar to: Samba related errors

Help me ! I cannot start smbd, it immediatly stops, I've got in my log.smb [1999/05/19 14:53:43, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(709) bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0.0.0.0 (Adresse déja utilisée.) And then It stops, I cannot launch smbd. I my /etc/services, I've got the two lines : netbios-ssn 139/tcp netbios-ns 137/upd and in /etc/inetd.conf netbios-ssn stream tcp

Hi, I've downloaded samba-2.0.7-hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.00.tar.Z and installed it on a HP K380 HP-UX 11.00 server. After starting the services I receive the following messages in the syslog and therefore can't get it to work: May 31 01:54:45 gemtst inetd[5462]: netbios-ns/udp: Service enabled May 31 01:54:45 gemtst inetd[5462]: bootps/udp: bind: Address already in use May 31 01:54:45 gemtst

I am getting errors when I try to start smbd which say that port 445 is already in use, but nothing else is using it. In the log, the full error is: -----start log.smbd---- [2004/02/02 11:03:53, 0] lib/util_sock.c:open_socket_in(662) bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0. Error = Address already in use ------end log.smbd----- In my /etc/services file, I have these entries:

June 14 2000 Dear Samba Folks: The same install on a Solaris 7 machine is flawless, this is on Solaris 8. Lots of dmesg stuff piling up. .However the "Toys at Work" (PC's) are running along and mounting their samba files just peachy and as usual don't know any different or better. Any ideas? This was installed using the 2.0.7 install from your site. +/- 3 weeks ago. (

Dear list; I have been using samba 1.9.18p10 on a Sun Sparc Ultra 2 for about a year. I use it to share a directory to an NT/95 network. I now have a Sun Sparc Ultra 10 running Solaris 2.6. In order to prepare the Ultra 10 for y2k I downloaded samba-2.0.6-nonis+-sparc-sun-solaris2.6.pkg.gz from

I have the book, "The Official Samba-3 Howto and Reference Guide" and I'm trying to get 3.0.22 running on Aix 5.2. All I want to do is setup some file sharing at the moment and map a drive from an XP pc to a directory on Aix. We have a Windows domain setup, the domain name is mobot.org. The Aix server is named mobot. I've been searching through the archives for

I've just downloaded and installed the SAMBA binaries for HPUX 10.20. I'm been unsuccessful in getting swat to run though. I've made the correct entries in the /etc/services file (swat 901/tcp) and in the /etc/inetd.conf file (swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /opt/samba/bin/swat swat) and have shutdown and restarted the inetd daemon. When I use Netscape and access

> Sistemas Comau do Brasil wrote: > I installed the version SAMBA_2.0.7 in a workstation SUN > SOLARIS_2.6. > Seemingly, everything works well, but it frequently happens > travamentos in the communication between Windows and Unix. > Somebody can help myself. It is very urgent!!! Mar 7 03:13:48 cad1 inetd[179]: netbios-ns/udp server failing (looping), service terminated Mar 7

I am having a hard time getting samba 2.0.4b running on a Sparc20 running Solaris 2.5.1. I have swat and smbd running, but not nmbd. I have tried all the stuff in diagnostics.txt and have searched the archives but am still stuck. I have tried to gather some useful info, in the hopes that some on this list will be able to figure this out. Thanks in advance. Here are the results of some of the

I'm currently running version 2.0.7 of samba(CIFS9000). I have HPUX 11.x installed on the samba server. When I try to run this from inetd it doesn't work. I can run a startup script that runs the smbd as a daemon and it works fine. But if I try to run it from inetd it won't start. The previous version of Samba 1.9.18p10 that I had on this server worked fine. Is this a bug in

On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:55 AM, Henning Brauer <hb-nut at bsws.de> wrote: > We have upd(4) attaching to these devices now. Either nut needs a > driver getting status from upd (trivial, will show up in the > hw.sensors sysctl tree) or we need some way for nut still being able > to talk to the ups directly, without upd and nut interfering with each > other. While a upd(4) driver

Hello, I am entirely new to this list, and not very experienced with R yet (but very excited about it!!). I am struggling with a dataset of x and y coordinate points I am plotting as a density map as follows: trial <- read.csv(file="F12.csv", sep=",", skip=32, head=TRUE) trial.sub <- subset(trial, Seconds>=30) trial.sub <- subset(trial.sub, Seconds<=1830) d

Hi, I'm not sure if it's rsync or Cygwin problem, but most probably both.. Here is a short description: I run rsync daemon on Windows machine (either latest cwRsync or Cygwin versions) and synchronize a Windows directory to Linux server as root: linux# rsync -avH --numeric-ids 10.0.0.1::test /export/test1/ receiving file list ... done created directory /export/test1 ./ 43524353.upd

helow my goal is to install via kickstart a CentOS 7 NFS server but I fail to set the firewall rules at installation time. In my kickstart file I set: # Firewall configuration # ssh and NFS # Ports 111 and 875 are for rquotad firewall --enabled --ssh --service=nfs --port=111:tcp,111:upd,875:tcp,875:upd On the installed server,? /root/anaconda-ks.cfg contains: # Firewall configuration firewall

I'm running Redhat 7.0, with Samba 2.0.7, But I'm having problems with it, I'm trying to get the Linux box to be authenticated on the NT network that we're running. Except that I am a little confused, when I installed Samba not all of the components were installed correctly, when I try to run the following executibles it tells me that they don't exist; addtosmbpass, nmbd,

Hello!   I estimate vector error correction model (vecm) model. I have only one cointegratio relationship. I write :   joh.vecm.rls <- cajorls(joh.vecm, r=1) The output estimation is : Call: lm(formula = substitute(form1), data = data.mat) Coefficients:                up.d            expl.d        upd.d           r.d      ect1      -1.34e-01   4.55e+02   6.91e+00   2.43e+03 constant 

On Sunday, January 26, 2020 3:58:31 PM CET Pete Biggs wrote: > > what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? > > By default I assume they are just dropped - that's what should happen. Hm that's what thought. > > Are such packets inevitably dropped? > > Applications can specifically disable checksum checking for the kernel > network stack

After much nashing of teeth, I have compiled and installed Samba on Mac OS X! The following lines (or something like them) should probably be added to the config.guess file in the samba/source directory: Power*:Darwin:*:*) echo powerpc-apple-darwin${UNAME_RELEASE} exit 0 ;; I added them right after the "mac68k:OpenBSD:*:*)" section. I was not able to get the inetd installation

* Henning Brauer <hb-nut at bsws.de> [2014-09-20 13:39]: > * Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> [2014-09-20 01:12]: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 5:18 PM, Stan Gammons <sg063015 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Looks like this patch fixed the problem. I see the status change now. > > Good to hear. > > I'm not familiar with the OpenBSD release process. Is

> what does Centos 7 do with UPD packets having invalid checksums? By default I assume they are just dropped - that's what should happen. > > Are such packets inevitably dropped? Applications can specifically disable checksum checking for the kernel network stack on a per application basis, but the default is to check and drop if in error. > Does a network card drop them