similar to: Samba and Encrypted File Systems - Linux (repost)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Samba and Encrypted File Systems - Linux (repost)"

2005 Apr 18
0
ENCFS + Samba?
I have a Samba network and want to be able to access files stored on the Linux server that is encrypted with ENCFS. Is this possible? If the encrypted system is unmounted, i can access the share from a windows computer but (of course) there's nothing in it. If the drive is mounted, then I cannot access it. access is denied. Any ideas? TIA PAB
2005 Mar 08
6
PGina & Samba
Does anyone have any experience using PGina with Samba for a simple "single sign on" approach using Windows clients? If so, I would love to know how it is working for you. I tried posting here a bit ago for a way to do this ("single sign on") with samba only, but I didn't get any responses and therefore looked into other opportunities. Thanks. Paul
2017 Nov 07
0
Gluster Summit BOF - Encryption
We had a BOF about how to do file-level volume encryption. Coupled with geo-replication, this feature would be useful for secure off-site archiving/backup/disaster-recovery of Gluster volumes. TLDR: It might be possible using EncFS stacked file system on top of a Gluster mount, but it is experimental and untested. At the moment, you are on your own. - The built-in encryption translator is
2015 Feb 19
2
Permissions problem with mdbox maildir
Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes: > Could you try what happens, if you create the hardlink manually as the > vmail user _two_ times, if the first link() succeeds. Maybe: > > 1) hard links won't work on your encfs, > 2) link() fails with "Operation not permitted" instead of "File exists" in > your case, if the target file
2015 Feb 19
0
Permissions problem with mdbox maildir
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Emanuel Evans wrote: > Hi! Apologies if this has come up before, or if this is a duplicate > posting (I tried posting before but I think it got lost). Anyways, I'm > trying to set up an IMAP server with dovecot, and everything seems to be > more or less working except that I periodically see error messages like
2015 Feb 23
0
Permissions problem with mdbox maildir
Emanuel Evans <emanuel.evans at gmail.com> writes: > Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes: > >> Could you try what happens, if you create the hardlink manually as the >> vmail user _two_ times, if the first link() succeeds. Maybe: >> >> 1) hard links won't work on your encfs, >> 2) link() fails with "Operation not
2006 May 04
6
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3752] New: rsync unusable with EncFS filesystem
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 Summary: rsync unusable with EncFS filesystem Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: micheala@jacey.org
2017 Jan 13
1
Rsync tries to access unnecessary files/dirs after chrooting itself.
Hi. While debugging some encfs errors in the logs, I realized they are being generated because rsync (chrooted inside a encfs file system, --reverse) is trying to access files like: /root/.popt, /etc/localtime etc. This doesn't seem to be related to ID-name mapping as I already have numeric ids enabled in config. Here is the relevant strace output: [pid 25549] chroot("/chroot")
2015 Feb 18
2
Permissions problem with mdbox maildir
Hi! Apologies if this has come up before, or if this is a duplicate posting (I tried posting before but I think it got lost). Anyways, I'm trying to set up an IMAP server with dovecot, and everything seems to be more or less working except that I periodically see error messages like this in my logs: Feb 18 01:01:15 stark dovecot: lmtp(31956, root at aleme.nu): Error:
2004 Apr 25
0
BugTracker Information - REPOST
All, As a bug marshal, I have noticed quite a few bugs that seem to get overlooked/ignored due to the fact that they do not have the appropriate information in the bug information fields, or bugnotes. I am, therefore, Reposting an old post from July 26th, 2003, to help clarify the use of the Bugtracker. Sorry if you have read it before; this is just an attempt to re-familiarize
2017 Nov 11
2
how safe is "net use" in a batch file? plus some encryption questions
A customer asked me if someone would be able to sniff (wireshark or something like that) a password if plugging into the same switch as their samba server. They use a desktop icon pointing at a plain old bat-file containing a "net use" command with the password right in there. I *assume* that the "net use" authenticates via encrypted communication? could someone confirm
2008 Nov 19
1
chdir / chroot after pre-xfer ?
Hello, I am trying to configure rsyncd to mount destination encrypted FS (using EncFS) before syncing. In my rsyncd.conf : [test] path = /home/dest <...> pre-xfer exec = sleep 30 ; echo mypassword | encfs -S /home/ encrypteddir /home/dest ; sleep 30 (I have put "sleep 30" instructions just to make some tests) /home/encrypteddir is correctly mounted by rsyncd to /home/dest
2007 Sep 05
0
Remote EFS share mounting
Hi all, I have a system/process in place where I mount remote shares(with EFS) on windows boxes from Linux servers and rsync data to them. The Windows machines now are windows 2000 pro and I need to migrate them to Windows XP or even Vista later in the future. The Windows 2000 Pro machines which work are set up like so: Local folder path: c:\datashare Share: \\machinename\share$
2017 Nov 11
0
how safe is "net use" in a batch file? plus some encryption questions
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:02:31 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > A customer asked me if someone would be able to sniff (wireshark or > something like that) a password if plugging into the same switch as > their samba server. > > They use a desktop icon pointing at a plain old bat-file containing a > "net
2019 Mar 21
3
Maildirs on AWS EFS
Hello, AWS released one month ago a EFS system with administered life cycle, which means that files not accessed in the last 30 days are moved to a lower cost storage tier. Currently I hold my e-mail, delivered to Maildir++ folders by postfix and retrieved with Dovecot, in standard EBS volumes. This has the disadvantage that I need to allocate more than enough space to ensure that the volume
2009 Aug 10
4
Encrypted File Storage
Anyone got any experience/suggestions for a way to store a directory of sensitive information on a CentOS box? This directory contains many scripts and output files, I need it backed up but not unencrypted and don't want to store it in a tar file type archive as when it needs to be accessed and have scripts executed/data generated, it needs to be untarred/unencrypted and I don't know the
2006 Feb 14
1
RE: problem with Too many open files(REASON FOUND)
Hi again, For what it is worth, we found out that MS Outlook on Citrix now and then opens thousands(17-18000) of references(filehandles) to the same PAB(Personal Address Book) files and then give up these references again after a while !? This was what made Samba chooke. We will now remove all PAB access from Outlook. Sorry for wasting Samba mailing list bandwidth ;-) Kind
2009 Nov 19
4
mac client and inherited permissions
Hi everyone, We are a longtime samba/win desktop shop but are getting more Macs. Samba sernet rpms 3.3.9 on CentOS 5.4 test box (started to test 3.43 but will wait) and I confirmed a problem I have been having in production. Server is ADS member with ldap stored idmap. All AD auth and idmap are identical to production servers and have been working fine for years. Filesystem is XFS and there are
2011 Sep 09
2
acst_as_solr error
hi, i am using https://github.com/mattmatt/acts_as_solr it shows the following error "undefined method ''each'' for " for this results = Employee.find_by_solr(@id) results.each do |emp| puts emp.id end where plugin does not contains "each" method in acts_as_solr/libs/ search_results.rb so for me each is not working with ActsAsSolr::SearchResults
2005 Dec 30
2
Domtools.com hyjacked?
Attempted to install dlint port. Only distribution site is www.domtools.com Email to 'content@domtools.com' and pab@domtools.com bounces (can't relay) Phone number missing on whois record. Fetch of tarball fails checksum (it delivers a generic 'web hosted search engine that just hijacked someone's domain' web page. Maybe domtools didn't renew? New web company