similar to: ENCFS + Samba?

Hi everyone. just thought i'd reword by previous message about ENCFS and Samba. I guess what I'm trying to find out is can Samba work with any encrypted file systems? Does anyone have any experience/advice on this? I want to be able to see the Linux encrypted file system from a windows computer when the EFS is mounted, but not be able to see it when it isn't mounted. Right now,

Hi, I'm running the latest stable nut (2.4.3). It doesn't appear to provide support for the Tripp Lite SmartOnline SU1000XLA. [sups] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto vendorid = 09ae productid = 4004 4337# upsdrvctl start Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3 Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3) USB communication driver 0.31 Using subdriver:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3752 Summary: rsync unusable with EncFS filesystem Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: micheala@jacey.org

Dear ZFS-Users, I want to switch to ZFS, but still want to encrypt my data. Native Encryption for ZFS was added in "ZFS Pool Version Number 30<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS#Release_history>", but I''m using ZFS on FreeBSD with Version 28. My question is how would encfs (fuse encryption) affect zfs specific features like data Integrity and deduplication? Regards

Hello, I am trying to configure rsyncd to mount destination encrypted FS (using EncFS) before syncing. In my rsyncd.conf : [test] path = /home/dest <...> pre-xfer exec = sleep 30 ; echo mypassword | encfs -S /home/ encrypteddir /home/dest ; sleep 30 (I have put "sleep 30" instructions just to make some tests) /home/encrypteddir is correctly mounted by rsyncd to /home/dest

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Emanuel Evans wrote: > Hi! Apologies if this has come up before, or if this is a duplicate > posting (I tried posting before but I think it got lost). Anyways, I'm > trying to set up an IMAP server with dovecot, and everything seems to be > more or less working except that I periodically see error messages like

Hi! Apologies if this has come up before, or if this is a duplicate posting (I tried posting before but I think it got lost). Anyways, I'm trying to set up an IMAP server with dovecot, and everything seems to be more or less working except that I periodically see error messages like this in my logs: Feb 18 01:01:15 stark dovecot: lmtp(31956, root at aleme.nu): Error:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1351 Summary: encrypted pam_mount volumes stays mounted after logout with ssh Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.6p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: PAM support AssignedTo:

We had a BOF about how to do file-level volume encryption. Coupled with geo-replication, this feature would be useful for secure off-site archiving/backup/disaster-recovery of Gluster volumes. TLDR: It might be possible using EncFS stacked file system on top of a Gluster mount, but it is experimental and untested. At the moment, you are on your own. - The built-in encryption translator is

Hi. I'm trying to keep most of my data encrypted when possible, only keeping the decryption key in memory (and thus vulnerable to local attacks) when I'm actually using my data. In practice, this means using pam_mount to mount my home directory from an encrypted device. It almost looked like I could get this to work with mail as well, even when read via IMAP from a remote client: I

Hi all, Can anyone explain or give an clues as to what just happened? I'm running CentOS 5.2 as a desktop with Gnome. Fully up to date, etc. I was dragging a folder of image (.jpg) files to another folder on the same filesystem (LVM ext3) with the mouse and as I dropped the folder into the new folder - poof! - it disappeared like a puff of smoke. I've searched everywhere for the

Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes: > Could you try what happens, if you create the hardlink manually as the > vmail user _two_ times, if the first link() succeeds. Maybe: > > 1) hard links won't work on your encfs, > 2) link() fails with "Operation not permitted" instead of "File exists" in > your case, if the target file

Emanuel Evans <emanuel.evans at gmail.com> writes: > Steffen Kaiser <skdovecot at smail.inf.fh-brs.de> writes: > >> Could you try what happens, if you create the hardlink manually as the >> vmail user _two_ times, if the first link() succeeds. Maybe: >> >> 1) hard links won't work on your encfs, >> 2) link() fails with "Operation not

El 18/07/15 a les 17:03, Charles Lepple ha escrit: > On Jul 17, 2015, at 9:42 AM, dmanye <dmanye at urv.cat> wrote: > >> so i reinstalled again... but instead of using four separate partitions for /, /usr, /var and /tmp, put all the stuff under an unique / partition and... it works! why exactly? no idea, because if i'm not wrong, nut sensitive stuff is under /lib, /sbin,

Hi. While debugging some encfs errors in the logs, I realized they are being generated because rsync (chrooted inside a encfs file system, --reverse) is trying to access files like: /root/.popt, /etc/localtime etc. This doesn't seem to be related to ID-name mapping as I already have numeric ids enabled in config. Here is the relevant strace output: [pid 25549] chroot("/chroot")

The ensure parameter for the mount type has a ''present'' option, which will unmount the filesystem if its mounted. I was hoping that ''present'' meant to make sure it was listed in the mounts file, but to not do anything with it (ie. don''t unmount if mounted, and don''t mount if unmounted). I thought this was how the ensure =>

Just checking to be sure this isn''t a known bug or problem. I couldn''t find a bz for this, but it would appear that tunefs.lustre --print fails on a lustre mdt or ost device if mounted with mmp. Is this expected behavior? TIA mds1-gps:~ # tunefs.lustre --print /dev/mapper/mdt1 checking for existing Lustre data: not found tunefs.lustre FATAL: Device /dev/mapper/mdt1 has not

I upgraded from a RedHat 9 to CentOS 4.1 system using yum without any hiccup. Upon reboot, the kernel appears to be stalled after printing this message: "Creating block devices". Keyboard is still responsive and you can press ALT-CTRL-DEL to reboot the system (when pressed, it says something about MD being unmounted). This is the last few lines before it hangs: Freeing unused kernel

A customer asked me if someone would be able to sniff (wireshark or something like that) a password if plugging into the same switch as their samba server. They use a desktop icon pointing at a plain old bat-file containing a "net use" command with the password right in there. I *assume* that the "net use" authenticates via encrypted communication? could someone confirm

> Hello syslinux, > > Merry Christmas! These patches will make extlinux work with umounted > ext2/3/4 filesystem, for example: > > $ extlinux -i /dev/sdXN > or > $ extlinux -i file_block > > Also it can work with something like: > $ extlinux /dev/sdXN --reset-adv > or > $ extlinux file_block --reset-adv > Thank you. The 'extlinux' command