similar to: Emergency - please help

Thanks, Unfortunately, I still got the same error. I may be wrong, but it is like it does the automatic lookup process of kdc instead of using the krb5.conf file. However, as per my note below, if I do add bad config info to the krb5.conf, it does complain. David David Shapiro Unix Team Lead 919-765-2011 >>> Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos@firstbhph.com> 2/1/2006 10:15:49 AM

Hello to all. I want to use winbind to automatically create email accounts. I've added several linux boxes to our win2k3 AD and working pretty well (more in a new post about this). When I create a new user on the win2k3 box, users can access various shares on the linux boxes, as it should be. I also have a sendmail server sitting in a DMZ. I have to create the email user account on

okay, im far from a pam expert, but i don't see any mention of winbind there? It's my weekend at the moment so i can't get to my test box at work to show you my pam module using winbind, but maybe you should check out this page on my website, it's using ldap try and use this and replace any mention of ldap with winbind http://www.yourhowto.org/content/view/35/9/ or i have a

Folks, Sincere apologies for asking this again, but I'm just not getting this to work, and must be missing something here: My company's network is based around a Windows 2003 server AD, with several RHEL AS 3 boxes connected to it via samba (3.0.21c-1). ?This scheme works very well. ?I've set up, and have successfully been using a sendmail-based email system, too. My issue is

Good morning/evening to all. I hope I'm not taking up space here or wasting people's time but - I've had several samba machines joined to a Win2k3 AD for some time now. Of course, I'm using kerberos, but that's it. I've kinda rolled the bones up 'til now in that I've relied on the PDC without having a BDC. But, if the PDC were to experience any down time

Hi, all. I'm working on a project to create a Samba PDC with LDAP authentication. I've been pretty successful in getting everything to work. However, I've run into a small snag: The PDC is built on an OpenSuse 11.2 box. Most of the member servers are also OpenSuse 11.2 boxes. However, a CentOS 5.5 server was just added to the mix. While users can lo into the CentOS box,

Ok I deleted the incorrect conf file and set it up using Yast again here is the amended file. I tried using the IP address of the server this time but I'm still getting the same errors as before. [libdefaults] default_realm = ELLISONSLEGAL.COM clockskew = 300 [domain_realm] .ELLNET = ELLISONSLEGAL.COM [realms] ELLISONSLEGAL.COM = { kdc = 10.0.0.31 default_domain = ELLNET

On Thursday July 13 2006 12:39 pm, you wrote: > Dimitri Yioulos wrote: > > Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, > > but my search didn't turn up much: > > > > I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on > > several CentOS 3 and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3 > > domain. ?On one particular box, ?winbind dies on > > a regular

Serious apologies if this has been discussed before, but my search didn't turn up much: I have samba (kept up-to-date with latest) running on several CentOS 3 and 4 boxes as part of a Win2k3 domain. On one particular box, winbind dies on a regular basis (all the other installations run flawlessly). A quick restart, and we're good again. However, as this is a very active server

Having read a few posts recently I thought I would do some testing. Given XP's use of 445 and that I have a couple of networks where they only have XP clients, I thought I would try setting smb ports to 445 only rather than that suggested of just specifying 139. This has worked well for XP clients with SP2. However SP1, and presumably pre-SP1 clients, lose all sight of the NBT network.

We have a Red Hat 7.3 file server that serves about 30 Windows PCs via Samba 2.2.3a. I have one group called "users" that everyone is in but when a file is created by a PC, the group ownership on the created file is not "users", but the same as the file owner name. Is there any way to force the group ownership of created files? Also, is there any way to force file

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 01:01:47PM +0100, Raimund Sacherer wrote: > This is our setup which we are trying in a couple of our remote offices: [...] > FW-01 and FW-02 are Master/Slave firewalls (pfSense with Carp failover). We have currently 3 "remote offices" connected which have all basically the same setup, one office has more internet lines. > > Currently I have it

Hello, I've managed to join four other samba servers to win2k3 domains in the past but I am stuck doing so with samba-3.0.23c_2,1. I've verified hosts / domain forward and reverse lookups succeed. Below are my configurations. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-stable cvsupped as of Nov 17. I've built Samba with the following options... WITH_LDAP=true WITH_ADS=true WITHOUT_CUPS=true

Hi All, I'm running into some issues accessing a Samba server that's in turn authenticating against a Win2k3-SP1 domain controller (security=ads). I understand there were some known issues corrected in a patch, and I'm currently running 3.0.15pre2, which I understand includes that patch. (http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.13/winbindd_2k3sp1.patch) All was working fine

Maybe my printers being offline with samba 3.0.13 on some xp pro workstations is not a bug after all, maybe it was a (mis)feature in samba-2.2? My problem is that I can't easily test on < 3.0.13, because until a few days ago I had been running 2.2.12 and all was fine, then. No printers showed as offlne. But then I upgraded to 3.0.7 for a day or two immediately followed by an upgrade to

My apologies. I'll do that. Dimitri On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 12:39 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Dimitri Yioulos wrote: > > > Hello to all. > > > > I read in a prior post that samba 3.x.x doesn't play well with MIT kerberos > > from version 1.2.something and earlier (or vice-versa. Sorry, I looked > > briefly, but didn't find

I am thinking about a change to our company's phone "layout" and would like to get comments from people who have done something similar. Currently, we have 3 locations - each with their own Asterisk PBX. The corporate office has a PRI. Each remote location has a SIP provider for 5 channels of SIP going to their own PBX. Interoffice calls use the PSTN. Most inbound calls come to

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [LARTC] "weight" parameter in htb? Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:54:01 +0530 From: Shekhar Joshi <shekhar@disha.co.in> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl On Tuesday 02 April 2002 07:32 pm, you wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:34:08PM +0200, Martin Devera wrote: > > > E.g. you might have a customer agency which needs say 256

I am having a hard time getting Samba to authentication correctly against a Windows Active Directory setup. Here is a snap of the smb.conf [global] passdb backend = ldapsam security = domain password server = server1.com server2.com prefered master = No local master = no hide unreadable = yes wins support = no winbind use default

Here's the procedure: # qemu-img -f qcow2 /vm/win2k3.img 8G # virt-install --connect qemu:///system -n win2k3 -r 512 --vcpus=1 -c /home/temp/win2003sp2ins.iso -f /vm/win2k3.img -s 4 --network=bridge:br0 --mac=00:ff:ff:ff:58:58 --noautoconsole --vnc --os-type=windows --os-variant=win2k3 --hvm --accelerate And I get error as below: Starting install... internal error unable to start guest: qemu: