similar to: Mac/Samba capacity detection problem

Hi, I've been having a problem in Samba version 3, using "security = share". When you have a share that you want to be read-only to one group, and read-write to another. It ends up being read-write for both groups. This behavior seems inconsistent with Samba 2.2.x behavior. Have the configuration options changed, or is this a bug? This issue is listed on Samba's

Dear all, unfortunately I observe drastic drops in read- performance when I connect LUNs >2.2T to our Centos 5.5 Servers. I suspect issues with the GUID Partition Table, since it happens reproducibly only on the LUNs >2.2T and goes back to normal performance when using a LUN <2T with "normal", Legacy MBR partitions. All machines are CentOS 5.5 (and RHEL 5.5) on IBM Blades

Should I report this as a bug somewhere? Or is it just a problem with the old fedora box, probably fixed long ago and not relevant to the centos list? On the server side, theme4, a very old fedora box, exports t4d5 via NFS. t4d5 is big, has lots of space, and the user tobiasf has plenty of quota: [root at theme4 ~]# quota -vls tobiasf|grep sdf /dev/sdf1 1312G 4578G 4769G

We recently bought a 32-bit Xeon system with a 12-port 3Ware RAID card and a dozen 500GB drives. We wanted to create 4TB drive arrays; however, we soon discovered that there is about a 2.2TB drive array size limit on 32-bit hardware. Does that sound correct? Would replacing the 32-bit mobo/cpu with a 64-bit mobo/cpu allow us to use drive arrays larger than 2.2TB? Thanks.

Our basic system is as follows: P4 3.0 Ghz w/ HT, 1GB PC3200 RAM, 120 GB HDD, RH 9.0 OS, * from CVS several weeks ago, working OK for routing, VM, and AA, calls in on separate PSTN lines to Adtran TSU 600, into * server through T100P card. The hardware is not taxed at all with little over 20% proc utilization ever, low mem use, etc. All Phones are SNOM 200's with various firmware revisions

OK, so our old MDS had hardware issues so I configured a new MGS / MDS on a VM (this is a backup lustre filesystem and I wanted to separate the MGS / MDS from OSS of the previous), and then did this: For example: mount -t ldiskfs /dev/old /mnt/ost_old mount -t ldiskfs /dev/new /mnt/ost_new rsync -aSv /mnt/ost_old/ /mnt/ost_new # note trailing slash on ost_old/ If you are unable to connect both

Hello list, I recently enabled shared storage on a working cluster with nfs-ganesha and am just storing my ganesha.conf file there so that all 4 nodes can access it(baby steps).? It was all working great for a couple of weeks until I was alerted that /run/gluster/shared_storage was full, see below.? There was no warning; it went from fine to critical overnight.

hello all, Hoping for some help on copying Logical Volumes. I would like to copy an existing LV to a newly formed LV. I don't want to do a snapshot of an existing LV. Only way I've seen is to mount the to LV and: mount /dev/vg00/lv00 /mnt/orig mount /dev/vg00/lv01 /mnt/copy cd /mnt/orig tar cf - ./ |(cd /mnt/copy; tar xf - ) Is there a LV tool to do this? Or an option used with

I've been running continous dsync backups of our Maildirs for a few weeks now, with the destination dsync server using mdbox and SIS. The idea was that the destination server would act as a warm copy of all our active users data. The active servers are using Maildir, and has: $ df -h /usr/local/atmail/users/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/atmailusers

Hello Fairly new to libvirt. I’m hoping to both solve a problem with this question as well as learn more detail about how libvirt works. Using RHEL 6.4 and libvirt version is 0.10.2 and qemu-img version is 0.12.1.2 Using virt-manager I created a VM. Nothing unusual as far as I can see. I then added a disk. So I have a second virtio based volume which the guest then mounts as a separate

I know df does not report the correct size for btrfs raid systems. Is there any other way to find out the total capacity of a btrfs file system? Or at least the raid level for data / metadata? My test system is Ubuntu 10.10 alpha with btrfs 0.19 and a 2.6.35 kernel (don''t know which rc). # uname -a Linux ubuntu 2.6.35-12-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 26 18:48:06 UTC 2010 x86_64

Author: talley Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 8f002966e2de5d912f1b3f740784a1307059b667 Log message: 6351004 capacity of pool in zfs gui is not consistent with the output of zpool list Files: update: usr/src/lib/libzfs_jni/common/libzfs_jni_dataset.c

Hi, I''ve been reading lots of documents and examples of setting up traffic shaping, and found that they _all_ refer to specific bandwidths for queues. I am using a dialup connection, and therefore can connect at different rates, and also have a dynamically changing ''bandwidth'' dependent on compression. What I want to do is to specify that interactive traffic (telnet,

Hi, I'm wondering what the proper way is to determine the utilization of host resources when running a couple of VMs. I know xentop but the man-page isn't exactly helpful in explaining what the values it displays actually mean. What I'm looking for is a way to say "Ok, i have 4 VM's running and right now they utilize 40% of the cpu resources the host has, 50% of disk i/o

Hi Bernd, There have been a lot of improvements in Samba since 2.0.5; I know that the 2.0.7 version is supposed to support unix HFS and VxFS quotas. Also the "with-quotas" option must be turned on at compile time, so perhaps your 2.0.5 version was not compiled "with-quotas"... I tested quotas and the HP 2.0.7 version here and it works the way that Dirk mentions, you will get

I create a volume?and mounted it, and use df command to view the volume Available and used . After some testing? I think the used information displayed by df is the sum of the capacities of the disks on which the brick is located. Not the sum of the used of the brick directory. ?I know the Available capacity, is the physical space of all disks if not quota? but used of space should not be sum of

Hi, is there a good reason why taskomatic check the number of real cores in the find_capable_host ? It prevents to use the full capacity of multithreading Signed-off-by: Arthur Clement <aclement at linagora.com> --- src/task-omatic/taskomatic.rb | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/task-omatic/taskomatic.rb b/src/task-omatic/taskomatic.rb index

I have a 1.8 GHz, 1 G RAM machine that I would like to use for conferencing. How many users have you all had on a box like that before? I have a Digium quad T1 card in the box right now, so I could have up to 96 users on this system. Has anyone ran into problems with degradation of service as the number of users increased. I haven't tested it out yet, but would be interested to hear any

Hi; I am in the process of planning a PBX/Voice mail system for a business with an ISDN phone system and somewhere on the order of 12 internal phones. The ISDN system appears to be a Primary Rate Interface, though this may be irrelevent because receptionists answer all inbound telephone calls before possibly transferring via the PBX, and most calls do not get transferred. Telephone use

I have a couple of capacity related questions for which I am hoping to find answers (or at least hints) derived from real-world experience. asterisk as a "trunking gateway"; bunch of sip phones in location one need to access other non-* sip PBX device in location two over constrained bandwidth. I can't replace the existing SIP phones or the other SIP device.