similar to: trouble with groupmap

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "trouble with groupmap"

2004 Jan 30
1
GroupMap Issues
I have been trying to figure out what this error is: Jan 29 18:23:07 dc2 smbd[20729]: [2004/01/29 18:23:07, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(371) Jan 29 18:23:07 dc2 smbd[20729]: get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [barbara] is not a Domain group ! Jan 29 18:23:07 dc2 smbd[20729]: get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that Jan 29 18:23:08 dc2
2007 Sep 25
1
Samba and TCPWrappers
Good Morning, I have a Centos 4.5 (x86_64) server running samba to share data with windows users. We've been going through a security audit and the following log entries were noted: [2007/09/24 09:37:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_alias_user_groups(206) get_alias_user_groups: gid of user bendew doesn't exist. Check your /etc/passwd and /etc/group files [2007/09/24 09:37:29, 1]
2003 Dec 05
0
Samba 3.0.1pre3/ldap - Strange gid mappings server side
Good day, I'm running some tests with Samba 3.0.1pre3 with an LDAP sam. LDAP has been, to the best of my abilities, properly populated with the needed group mappings. The "net groupmap list" command indeed shows the following: [root@box bin]# ./net groupmap list Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-2009448231-1530593524-1969381020-512) -> domadm Domain Users
2006 Jun 11
0
User mapping
Hello, Is here anyone who could tell me where I am able to find FAQ or HOWTO about proper user mapping. I fight with it for over a week and I still recive sth like this belowe. Does usrmgr work with samba? [2006/06/11 15:41:29, 1] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(298) get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [root] is not a Domain group ! get_domain_user_groups: You should fix
2006 May 27
0
Problem with RID,SID and usrmgr
Hello, First of all, I would like to say that this is my third attempt to make Samba working as PDC. On the very beginning I had a problem with machine account, but after group mapping and cleaning group maps, I was able to add it from command line - using smbpasswd (according to this point, I would like to ask: "machine" unix group is only allowed for machines? Am I not able to
2005 Mar 24
2
Samba 3.0.12 (gid of user [joe] doesn't exist) Weird error when Client logs on.
Hi, I just recently purchased a new server and took this opportunity to upgrade to the latest version of samba (3.0.12). Unfortunatly, I have some weird occurances. I have a user called "joe" who is my admin user. In /etc/passwd I have this: joe:x:500:500:Joe:/home/joe:/bin/bash In /etc/group I have this: admin:x:500:joe id returns correctly: uid=500(joe) gid=500(admin)
2005 Mar 31
0
primary gid of user [1005] is not a Domain group !
Hello have seen similar posts, but no conclusive corrections, the logons take up to 1,30min. Can somebody help? TIA Bruno [2005/03/30 14:42:51, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(648) praia2 (192.168.0.29) connect to service 1005 initially as user 1005 (uid=512, gid=513) (pid 2315) [2005/03/30 14:55:06, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(836) praia2 (192.168.0.29) closed connection to
2004 Jan 22
0
Roaming Profiles problem
Background: I've setup my server (name:firewall) to acts as a PDC, and to use roaming profiles. I am using Windows XP with sp1 on the client machines. Problem: When I login to my domain (panacea) I get the following error-message: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Windows cannot locate the server copy of your roaming profile and is attempting to log
2005 Mar 19
1
samba log gid doesn't exist warnings
Hello, i am running fedora core 3 kernel version = kernel-2.6.10-1.770_FC3 samba version = samba-3.0.10-1.fc3 i have it running as a PDC with roaming profiles. i get the below warnings. i checked both the /etc/passwd and /etc/group file. they are fine. so i am not sure what i can do to fix this problem. any help is appreciated. thanks. ib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000) getpeername failed.
2004 Aug 09
1
Verbose Logs?
Hello. I'm not quite sure what the problem with my samba is. Im running red hat 9 and samba 3.0 and my log has far too much information. this is my samba log: --------------------- samba Begin ------------------------ **Unmatched Entries** lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(978) getpeername failed. Error was Socket operati on on non-socket : 2 Time(s)
2003 Oct 07
1
userGroupRid and groupmapping
Hi ! When I create a user with samba-ldap tools, the userRid is calculated if the -x option is set. The userGroupRid is calculated too. But is the groumapping is enabled, the SambaPrimaryGroupSID not correspond with SambaSID of groupmapping Example : Groupe "Domain Users" : gidNumber 100 displayName Domain Users objectClass sambaGroupMapping sambaSID
2003 Oct 05
1
Samba 3.0 issues with mapped drives properties
Mandrake 9.1 Samba 3.0, windows2000 pro sp4. I finally got Samba 3.0 working thanks to G?mes G?za. Now I am having another issue as outlined below: 1)There are 2 users on the Linux pc, markw (regular user) and root. Both have valid samba passwords. 2)I have a share called: [data] path = /test valid users = markw, root read only = No browseable = yes 3)I am able to map the share with the user
2002 Aug 03
0
Samba 3.0-alpha 18 with ldapsam backend and primary gid of user?
Hello list, Can someone tell me why I keep getting these kind of errors in the samba log files? I just went over from 2.2.5 to 3.0-alpha 18, I never had these errors in the 2.2.5 version. Especially the rid [0] is a complete mistery to me since I have no account defined in my ldap service that has rid 0. Thank you very much for your help. Eddie Lania. ---------------- [2002/08/03 19:21:27, 0,
2002 Aug 03
0
Fw: Samba 3.0-alpha 18 with ldapsam backend and primary gid of user?
Hi again, I just wanted to add this to make my information more complete: The id primary group id of user "eddie" in the ldap tree is 500:201. 201 is the group "Domain Users" But you have to know that user "eddie" also excists with id and gid 500:500 in the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files. Examining the log file below, this raises the following question to me: Is
2003 Feb 09
0
Linux PDC / Win2K /Frontpage
Hi there I am using the latest version samba (debian unstable) as a PDC for a Win2K server and I am trying to Use Frontpage 2002 Server Extensions on it. I have a few problems 1) I have a shared drive on the Linux Box and I share it on the win2k box mounted with an Administrator user. When I try and change the permission it says I am not allowed to (I can chosoe the users to add etc, but when I
2004 Jan 22
0
Newbie to 3.0.1 and having problems
I have just upgraded from samba 2.2.7a to 3.0.1. For this upgrade I backed up my old samba installation, installed the new configuration and copied over the contents of the private directory which was secrets.tdb and smbpasswd. I ran testparm and everything seemed fine so I run samba and H drives come back up perfectly. I think I have 3 issues: 1) I noticed in /var/adm/messages that entries
2004 Mar 26
3
Error Message?
I'm running samba-3.0.2-7.FC1 on a Fedora Core 1 box. I see this error message in the log file for each user on my network; [2004/03/26 10:55:35, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(372) get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [glen] is not a Domain group ! get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that What does it mean? Martin Stacey IT Support
2005 Apr 28
1
get_domain_user_groups
Hello list, I'm using the samba 3.0.11... but when I access the log I have the following message. Somebody know what's happening? Apr 26 10:23:32 dsnd3576 smbd[4245]: [2005/04/26 10:23:32, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(376) Apr 26 10:23:32 dsnd3576 smbd[4245]: get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [ze] is not a Domain group ! Apr 26 10:23:32 dsnd3576
2004 May 15
2
Doman Group in new version of samba
New to list sorry if this has been address but didn't see it in recent archives. FC1 with Samba 3.0.2 I had an older RH73 system running samba 2 on it and recent moved up to FC and samba 3. Most everything transfered over well. I just took my smb.comf from the old system and put it on the new system and then ran swat making sure I didn't forget anything. Restarted server and wow... It
2004 Sep 18
1
upgraded old smb system to new release with a few errors
I moved an old smb system (version 2) over to a completely new system with version 3.0.7 running on FC2. I just copied the config files over and then ran swat and adjusted any problems that I found. Then save the swat config and started the smb server. Gosh be Good! It worked just fine. But... I stared noticing entries like these in the logs: