similar to: reduce_name and ACL's

Hi Everyone, I have a really huge trouble with the Acls under windows 7. I use filesystem's acls under samba and it works correctly under windows xp, but it does not in w7. I am not sure if it is a kind of bug, the case is last week I upgraded my samba 3.0 to 3.5 and my acls under w7 worked fine. Now the problem I have is if a directory is set for example with the grup 'company' and

I've been wrestling with a problem on newer versions of samba with a configuration that "used" to work in samba 3.0.33 (RedHat Enterpise 5 packages) This maybe due to changes in the may samba maps NT permissions, but i'm not sure so I thought I would ask. I have a samba 3.3.8 (RedHat Enterprise 5.5 Samba3x packages) and samba 3.4.4 (Redhat Enterprise 6 beta packages)

On Ubuntu, I have upgraded to the latest LTS version, which upgraded my Samba to 3.6.3 and now getting NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED when trying to remove files and folders. This server MEDIA is setup as a member server to a FreeBSD PDC called MAIL using LDAP for authentication. All been working great for a long time, now from the PDC, I try.... mail# smbclient -U robert //media/robert WARNING: The

All, Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old 4.0.25 server, users can write to files that they have group-based write permissions. On 4.5.x, 4.4.x, and 4.3.x that permission is not being honored. I would be incredibly

I need help interpeting this issue, thanks in advance. A file was created by user nli on windows 7, that user can manipulate the file at will. If user jpyeron tries to manipulate the file on XPx64 the below happens. # smbd -V Version 3.0.33-3.40.el5_10 [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(188) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning [2015/02/02 18:34:15, 8]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote: > All, > > Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at > my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've > replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old > 4.0.25 server, users can write to files that they have group-based > write

At the suggestion of Stas, I'm starting a new thread on this one. This pretty much covers where I'm at right now: Doug, thanks, here's a complete listing of the config file, and some logging, hopefully this will be illuminating to somebody. > Neither of these lines set the log level. Yes, I've been setting it in the init script. When I do ps -ef | grep smbd, I see that

Hi, I've a samba 3.0.24 server running in a debian "alike" OS with a (Open)LDAP backend and I'm having the following problem: I have LDAP users that belong to more than one (POSIX) group. For instance, I have a user2 that belongs to group "users" and "grupo2" and I have a share with the following ACL settings: getfacl /home/shares/share1/ getfacl: Removing

Hi. I'm dealing with this "lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_open(1009)" message in the log file. I tried to find some hint in the net but I couldn't find anything that pointed to a solution. Below are the surrounding messages in a excerpt of the log file: [2007/04/02 17:31:10, 3] passdb/lookup_sid.c:fetch_sid_from_uid_cache(918) fetch sid from uid cache 1088 ->

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share from the local EXT4 filesystem. When trying to

Hello,   I installed a samba server v 4.6.6, I use samba in classic mode (in /etc/default/sernet-samba). Samba is a member of a Windows server 2003 R2 domain.   Here is my smb.conf :   [global] use sendfile = no gpfs:getrealfilename = no smb ports = 445 139 dos charset = 850 unix charset = UTF-8 interfaces = eth0 bind interfaces only = true workgroup = MYREALM passdb backend =

Hello, Yes I wrote a mistike its not v4.6.6 but 4.6.5. For "unix password sync = yes" it is an old parameters, it was ten years ago an sftp server was installed with samba server. Currently there is no ftp server. Here is the AD object with RID 7022 objectClass: top objectClass: group cn: FREDGROUP member: CN=fpt,CN=Users,DC=cogesys,DC=com distinguishedName:

Maybe I'm doing somthing really stupid, but while copying some windows share onto a samba server, on some random subdirectory robocopy says ERROR 87 (0x00000057) Copying NTFS Security to Destination Directory... The samba logfile has lots of these lines. modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix) smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist ung?ltig) The strange thing is

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

Hello! I have samba share on my sshfs-mounted folder. All works just fine except I can't delete files from sshfs unless they are in 0777 chmodded directory. Even if that files were putted trough smbclient. I can read files, write files (regardless their directory permissions) but not delete them. Here is my share config: [myshare] comment = shre over sshfs path = /home/kli/work/remotes/dev

AIX 5.2 OpenLDAP 2.2.15 Samba 3.0.7 (no winbindd) I've got a stupid problem with referrals that I can't seem to ferret out. Each Samba DC has a localhost-based LDAP replica for scalability (my idea anyway). So the only way they will talk to the Master is if there is need for an update. Ok. If I make the updatedn the same as the rootdn of the replica, it updates the local database;

Hello, Really stumped on this issue. I have samba 4.4.7 running on a new server. Users cannot write to files to which they have write permissions via group. Example: Here's the local filesystem on the samba server. I'm logged in as jmalone : jmalone at canis; cd /home/www.nrao.edu/content/logs/ : jmalone at canis; ls -l total 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jmalone nraoweb 0 Nov 10 10:02

We have a three-way Samba trust in our development environment. All three are using OpenLDAP and Samba 3.0.21. The LDAP database is shared for access to Posix/Samba user info. SID's are appropriately assigned to the users and machines with algorithmic RID's and the IDMAP table is preloaded with the SID-RID to UID mappings. This all works and was tested with assigning windows ACLs to shares

Hi. I subscripted just now to the mailing list, but I've been using a Samba file server (PDC) on Debian for about 2.5 years now. Users are almost all WinXP SP3. No users are complaining but since I changed everything to one share with group permission on underlying directories I see a lot of errors in log.smbd. Anyone knows what the log message exactly means? I guess it has something to

We are controlling access to a share based on userid under the guidelines of HIPPA. So only our health care professionals in the dental hygeine labs can gain access to patient records. The problem is I've vonverted the long line to \CR entended lines and now I get : ERROR: string overflow by 358 in safe_strcpy [hammgab test2 billtest lb310453 lb293100 ab298138 ] ERROR: string overflow by 358