similar to: winbind 3.0.11 breaks winbind trust if netbios disabled?

Hi all. I originally suspected this problem was with netbios (which I have disabled by default) and Jerry has helped me out a bit with but I've been doing some more digging and I think the problem lies back further than I expected. I was trying to upgrade from 3.0.7 to 3.0.11 so I've recompiled all versions back from 3.0.11 and the problem first occured in 3.0.8. The issue is with

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Heads up.... If anyone has had problems with winbindd not being able to locate any domain controllers after upgrading to 3.0.11 *and* you have 'disable netbios = yes' in smb.conf, please test this preliminary patch (winbind_find_dc.patch). It's pretty rough currently but needs some more widespread testing. You can download it from :

I recently upgraded a backup fileserver used for testing purposes from samba-3.0.10 to the current samba-3.0.11 using the FreeBSD portupgrade. The fileserver is setup in a W2K AD. The fileserver uses Winbind to get AD accounts and shares are created on the Samba server. Worked fine until the upgrade. Here is a copy of the current smb.conf [global] unix charset = LOCALE

Hi list, This is my domain enviroment and all DC are windows 2008r2 http://i.imgur.com/8cNOtm2.jpeg When I used samba-4.0.5, I join my box to domain "HC1" , I got trusted domain "CHILD2" in "wbinfo -m". [/share/Public] # wbinfo -m BUILTIN MYBOX HC1 CHILD1 TREEROOT HC2 CHILD2 Then I upgraded my box to samba-4.4.4, I lost CHILD2 in "wbinfo -m".

Hi all. We are trying to migrate our domain controllers to win2003 and for some reason, samba loses its trust relationship with the server once the PDC has been upgraded. I'm running Samba 2.2.11. Normally, "wbinfo -t" returns "Secret is good.", but after the server was upgraded to win2003, the trust was lost and it started saying "Secret is bad." The wierd

Hello all, I am attempting to set up Squid and have the authentication occur onto a Windows 2003 ADS server (enterprise edition- if it matters), hostname W2003. I have followed instructions listed at: http://itmanagers.net/Documents/File/walkthroughs/~Linux@Squid/Squid+and+Samba+3+-+Walkthrough.html and have spent numerous hours(+15) attempting this. However, I can't seem to get past the

On 27/07/16 09:35, hy wu wrote: > Hi list, > > This is my domain enviroment and all DC are windows 2008r2 > > http://i.imgur.com/8cNOtm2.jpeg > > When I used samba-4.0.5, I join my box to domain "HC1" , I got trusted > domain "CHILD2" in "wbinfo -m". > > [/share/Public] # wbinfo -m > BUILTIN > MYBOX > HC1 > CHILD1 >

Hi guys, I have a strange problem. I can authenticate a user with wbinfo from my domain controller (security =3D ads), however when I try and map a share, the authentication fails. i.e. # wbinfo -a 'COAL+bcanglo%bcpass' plaintext password authentication succeeded challenge/response password authentication succeeded # smbclient '\\xxxxxxx\timtest' -U 'COAL\bcanglo'

Hi there I'm still going round in circles trying to get winbindd authentication against a 2003 server working. I have what appears to be the same problem as: http://www.ssite.org/articles/view.aspx?class=2&articleid=2 There's something wrong with the SMB Packet signing on this machine. In parallel, I succcessfully built and have got working samba-devel on FreeBSD 5.1 against the

Here is my smb.conf: [/usr/local/samba/var] # cat /etc/config/smb.conf [global] client schannel = false server schannel = false client ipc signing = false client signing = false server signing = false winbind sealed pipes = false require strong key = false passdb backend = smbpasswd workgroup = HC1 security = ADS server string = encrypt passwords = Yes username level = 0 map to guest = Bad User

> Sergey Loskutov wrote > >> Problem 2. >> Launch tools usrmgr.exe >> Try create user >> Username: "John". Select to group button. User by default in member to "Domain Users" >> Added group "Domain Admins" press ok and next ok ... user is create ..... it's greet! >> >> Select propertes user "John" and press

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, Looking to upgrade from Samba 3.0.11 to HP CIFS/9000 2.03 (which is basically a patched Samba 3.0.22) on HP-UX 11i. Looking at simultaneously moving from smbpasswd as my passdb backed to tdbsam. Looks pretty idiot proof, and I think I should have very little trouble. However, here is one slight problem that I'm running into so far: #

I've such a strange observation: For the 3.0.11 version (and below?) there is a patch named xp-missing-files.patch, which I've got from a Debian distro (but as I understand, it's not the Debian's one - it's some Samba's internal work). And that Samba whith this patch is ok - XP sees all the files exported by Samba. Then, since 3.0.12, there no more this patch - as it

> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Celeste Suliin Burris wrote: > > > Samba 3.0.11 won't compile on my Solaris 8 machine. It keeps getting > > compile errors in clitar [snip] I'm having this same problem. > Wonder why it is failing with #ifdef HAVE_REGEX_H ? That > macro is not defined anywhere. We don't even test for > regex.h anyways. Can you check > and see

Hi Jerry et al, I upgraded a while ago and everything looks fine at the first glance ;-) Though I discovered a huge problem with drivers that have some extended features/cards like the Xerox-Phaser7700. The driver installs just fine on the server but the extensions are not visible afterwards. Far more annoying: Clients can not install the driver, they get the 'no driver on server for queue

Am still having problems getting Samba/W2K ADS to work w/MIT-KRB5. Fresh install of following: Slackware 10.1 Openldap 2.2.23 MIT krb5 1.4 Samba 3.0.11 (with clitar patch) Following "http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.html#ads-member" I get to: kinit administrator@OURORG.OURDOMAIN.ORG (comes back to prompt after password, no error. klist -e gives:

I'm using gcc 3.4.1 on Solaris 9. A make check produced the following output after compiling 3.0.11... Anyone have suggestions on what to do to fix it, or should I just ignore it? strstr_m FAIL ----------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File

Hi, i have just compliled 3.0.11 (configure --prefix=/usr/local/ --with-ldapsm; make && make install) i added to smb.conf privileges = yes but when i do a "testparm" i get "Ignoring unknown parameter "privileges"" which will mean i cant use "net rpc rights" commands! Any ideas --

Hi, which file do all the privileges live which have been created.....i want to be able to copy it to my BDC so it can take over if the PDC crashed?? regards -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Daniel Wilson Systems Administrator IT & Communications Service University of Sunderland Unit1 Technology Park Chester Road Sunderland SR2 7PT Tel: 0191 515

To answer my own question of a week or so ago, as to whether RHAS3 users had got 3.0.11 to compile and execute (I had a plethora of errors): The Red Hat 3.0.11 SRPM from the Samba site compiled cleanly and runs fine (daemons and utilities) on my RHAS3 test rig, and on a RHAS3 update 4 production NAS server doubling as a Samba 3 server with 1150+ users of Unix/Linux and soon PDC Windows services.