similar to: ACL question

Hi all, I'm planning a migration from Sun Microsystems' PCNetLink CIFS service to Samba and have a problem I cannot solve: Is there a possibility to map Windows ACLs to reflect the following: We have user groups with their own group directories. We need to provide some users in their group directories the ability to read/create/modify/remove files, but they must not be able to change

I've been reading some documentation and can't find an answer to my question... I work in an environment where we have a bunch of Solaris 2.8 servers and a bunch of developers using Windows 2000 and XP desktops. We support a client using a Windows 2000 Server ADS PDC, and they need to map some of the NFS drives on our Solaris 2.8 servers. Currently we run a PCNetLink PDC (don't worry

A couple questions about how authentication works in Samba: -Is there a way to authenticate to a Samba PDC that does not require machine and (domain) user accounts to be in the /etc/passwd file (- a way other then LDAP or NIS)? -A follow up to that - is what is the purpose of requiring machines/users in both the /etc/passwd file and the smbpasswd file? - i read something about needing to

Looking for a poniter in the right direction My current configuration is NT4 PDC (Solaris PCnetlink) Samba Member server (Solaris 9 Samba ver 3.0.20b)for file and print sharing WinXp Pro Clients SP2 My problem is with the Domain Users. I am able to share out file systems to the XP clients from my Samba server OK. I am also able to modify the permissions for the files in the share in Solaris

Sun PCNetlink is a NT4.0 PDC emulator. I'm running samba-3.0.13, joined to an ADS server that has a trust with a PCNetlink domain. My samba can authenticate fine against ADS accounts, but refuses to authenticate against the PCNetlink domain. I can do getent passwd "ADSDOM\user" and get an ADS user printed out, but if I use getent passwd "NT4DOM\user" nothing

It looks as if 2-way trusts are working between Samba and PCNL and between Samba/NT4. The one exception seems to be logging in as Samba/myname on the ENT4 PDC. I had created a ENT4/myname account. I had forgotten to add SAMBA/myname to the local users group on the ENT4 PDC before trying to the ENT4 PDC as SAMBA/myname. If I log in as SAMBA/anothername it is OK. This isn't real show

Except that everything isn't fine, because I can't login to the samba domain as a PCNL/NT4 user or vice versa. -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE> > Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE > To: Damian Lock (SSCI) <Damian.Lock@ssci.com> > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.x and PCNetLink

I found part of the prob may have been that I didn't join the samba PDC to its own domain. # net join samba -U root Joined domain SAMBA Now, commands like "wbinfo -t" and "wbinfo -m" indicate that the domains are trusted. Also, I can run "net rpc samdump" to dump the NT4 domain info (but not the PCNL domain.) If I try to log in to the NT4 server as a

I am trying to establish a domain trust between a Samba 3.024 domain and a PC Netlink 2.0 domain. Currently, we are using PC Netlink as our primary Windows file server and "NT4" domain controller. (Lets say that the domain is called LEGACY and the domain controller LX1) Windows 2003 servers are unable to join a PC Netlink domain (even with the SignOrSeal option disabled.) For

On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >> >> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, >> including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the >> most part they have.

On 17/02/16 17:27, Ian wrote: > > On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >>> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >>> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >>> >>> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, >>> including ACL's and ownership

On 2/17/2016 9:43 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 17:27, Ian wrote: >> >> On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: >>> On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >>>> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >>>> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >>>> >>>> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch,

My Polycom IP301 hangs on "Processing Cfg..." Here is the boot log: 0930155446|so |4|00|---------- Initial log entry ---------- 0930155446|so |4|00|+++ Note that bootrom log times are in GMT +++ 0930155446|wdog |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|cfg |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|copy |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|cdp |4|00|Initial log entry 0930155446|cdp

I have a Sun Clutster running on two Sun Fire 4800s, OS is Solaris 9. The environment was set up with PC Netlink prior to my arrival. On Nov 24 after work I shutdown PC Netlink on both systems and started Samba. However from the windows side we can only see one Sun box and the one sun development box that I tested on prior to this weekend. The other production system can't be seen from

From what I know this log show everything working Perfect. Then it goes to the Welcome screen then after a long time of processing, it errors out with a 0x10000 error Any Ideas? 1005195711|so |4|00|---------- Initial log entry ---------- 1005195711|so |4|00|+++ Note that bootrom log times are in GMT +++ 1005195711|hw |4|00|Initial log entry. 1005195711|wdog |4|00|Initial log entry

I've pulled this down with Firefox, wget, a bittorrent client and an ftp client using Windows as well as Linux hosts. Is something wrong with the distributed DVD image? It has failed an MD5 check every time I've pulled it down. Paul Fontenot Wells Fargo Public Key Infrastructure Team Cryptography Services|IST|EIM|TES|TIG|Wells Fargo Email: ward.p.fontenot at wellsfargo.com

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:04:20PM +0000, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > Unfortunately, I often notice that even with the advanced UDP hole > punching mechanisms that tinc uses, I still come across cases on my > network where two nodes behind NATs cannot talk to each other because > one of the nodes is behind a "strict" NAT [...]. This type of NAT > will stop any UDP hole

I have been struggling over central provisioning for quite some time. I have eagerly watched each post with like problems but have yet to find a reliable answer. I have a Polycom 501 and I am trying to provision from an FTP server, and just to take any routing out of the issue it is on the same subnet. I am running the 2.0.1.0291 firmware and 3.2.2 bootrom. I set the IP info on the phone and

I now have one PDC (Samba 3.026a on Solaris 10) and several member servers (including Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9 and 10, and Samba 3.024 on Fedora core 6.) Each machine uses NIS for unix accounts. If I start smbd and nmbd on a member server, I can connect to a share from a windows 2000 or XP client. If I look at the permissions on a folder, if shows "Unix Account/someuser" or

Hello Samba's Users, Amazing thing I see, when I look into a permission tab on XP machine. No matter of which user I use to create new file, I always receive permission for: Domain Admins, Domain Users, All/Others. There is no entry for that user. I can add him manually, but I' ve thought that proper behaviour should give me as a result: User, His group, All/Others. Moreover I am not able