similar to: Oplocks with concurrent access from same client

What is this??????????????????????????????????????? > -----Original Message----- > From: samba@samba.org [mailto:samba@samba.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 3:06 AM > To: Bernhard Bruscha > Subject: SAMBA digest 2259 > > > SAMBA Digest 2259 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include:

samba@samba.org schrieb: > SAMBA Digest 1929 > > For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/ > Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) samba-2.0.0beta4 > by xuwenwei@163.net > 2) Re: SAMBA digest 1924 > by Rudolf Spreckels <Rudolf.Spreckels@mh-media.de> > 3) Problems connecting over

Hi! Been having the same problem with oplocks for a while and have been trying to figure out what's going wrong. The FAQ says that we may have a networking (hardware?) problem, but according to the Linux box's ifconfig results, we have had no errors and no dropped packets on the internal network. I am able to reproduce the error pretty much at will on our network, and it is not isolated

Can any one help me ? This has been bugging me for ages. I have been using different versions of samba for a while on different versions of Redhat (7.0, 7.2, 7.3). I regularly get erratic freezing (for about a minute) whenever I right click on files. This has happened on different computers on different sites on different networks, so I assume it's quite consistent This is what I get when

Hi, I sent a mail a few days ago to this list related with GFS+samba problems. Since the, we have installed a sepparated test environment also with two linux servers where we have tested a samba server with an exported share in GFS. The share is read-only and only one server is exporting it. When we try to access from a single windows client it works fine, but when we try to access to the

Hi All, I am working on a port of Samba to the uClinux/ColdFire system. This is a port of Linux running on the Motorola ColdFire processors. These processors have no MMU, so no virtual memory. It also means that there is no true fork() call, only a vfork() type primitive is supported. Other than this the fact that there is no MMU is pretty transparent applications, it looks like any other Linux

All, Is there any way of telling which machine is doing what job? i.e. Domain Controller, local master, wins server etc. I have two machines and two workgroups but they both appear on the same workgroup. I think it is something to do with which machine is doing what. I think machine1 is acting as Domain Controller & Master Browser for workgroup1 and Machine2 is loosing all the browse

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ******************************************************************** The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us immediately [ by clicking "Reply" ] and delete this email. Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems

Debian Woody with security updates Linux kernel 2.2.25 Samba 3.0.0 libc6 2.2.5 The problem I have is with a windows application that uses samba. This application is crucial for the organization, so if this is not fixed, and soon, we will have to ditch Samba and move to a windows server. I *really* don't want to do this, as Samba has been working so well for years now and billg is rich enough

Sorry, forgot to change the subject on my first posting. I was reading a comment this morning about something Microsoft had published to the effect that there were vendors guaranteeing 99.9% uptime for NT. The guy who wrote the reply did the math for what that means, and the results are very interesting. Quote below: OK, now what does a 99.9% uptime guarantee mean? Well, it means that at

Hi all. We have been denying NFS access to our Linux et al users since they can of course set their uid to whatever they want. So we tell them to use smbfs. But when I just tried experimenting by mounting my own network share on my Linux box via smbfs, and created a few files, I loo on the serevr and the files are all owned by root?! This has got to be a configuration issue right? -- Mark E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello I'm still in trouble with Word and Excel file on Samba shares that are read-only opened only I've increased the log level to 5 and then I get those error message error packet at smbd/blocking.c(318) cmd=36 (SMBlockingX) NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT Does this sounds familiar to anybody here ? Thanks a lot. -----BEGIN PGP

Hi there ! I just upgraded (last friday night) our main Samba host to Samba 2.0.0 from version 1.9.18p10. This host provides access to our own file based database system. The number of Samba clients is around 60 (nearly all NT4.0's and few NT3.51's). The Samba 2.0.0 host runs 'uname -a': HP-UX vertex A.09.05 A 9000/720 65914162 two-user license After the upgrade change I've

I'm trying to solve a roaming profile problem which manifests as a locking error during Win2K logout with roaming profiles enabled. Level 3 debug tells me: [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(213) markk opened file markk/ntuser.ini read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=1) [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(860) Transaction 1449 of length 75 [2002/05/30 11:59:58, 3]

There seems to be a few people having this problem, but not much response. I've dug into the logs, and while I don't know exactly what I am looking at, I think I may have found something that may make sense to someone. A short recap. Samba was working fine, until I did a Debian security update, which upgraded my Samba to 2.2.8a. Now, I can create files on a mounted Samba share in a

Hi all, I've got kind of strange setup, wherein all of my data is on a big NFS server (RH linux 8.0 running the 2.4.18 kernel and nfs-utils 1.0.1-2.80) and my Samba 3.0.0 PDC server (RH linux 7.3 w/ 2.4.18 kernel, nfs-utils 0.3.3-6.73) mounts the NFS export with the following options: rw,vers=3,wsize=8192,rsize=8192,hard,intr This mounted partition is then re-exported to the windows users

Hello, we have a Linux box running Samba 2.2.7a and several clients running Windows NT 4 WS (last service pack) and Windows 95 (last service pack too). All clients are running a program made in ACU-Cobol for Windows and sometimes the NT machines abort the execution reporting a cobol blocking error. This usually results in broken indexes... We have traced the execution and haven't found the

We're using Samba, and it's working very well, however I'm interested in finding out what approaches would work for having some sort of redundancies in place in case the main server crashes. Is there anything in place for Samba in order to have some sort of backup in place in case the main server crashes. The reason is that the server is critical to the company's business, and

Our site has been experiencing problems with Samba causing kernel panics under heavy use. We are running Mandrake 7.0 and Samba 2.0.6. We are no longer using the distro included with Mandrake - we actually downloaded the 2.0.6 release and recompiled. Downloading from Samba shares causes no problems - and downloads are frequent and heavy - but uploading similar amounts of data leaves a catatonic

I've tried to add an NT 4 BO server to a linux based network running samba. This morning we cannot log on using domain login like we could before, also our version control software has failed. Any ideas? Thanks Matthew Bunce Engineering Assistant CITEL Technologies Ltd Tel : 0115 940 5444