similar to: ACL Win XP problem

Hello everyone, I''m currently working on a module for NGINX that I''d love to get some input on. Code can be found here: http://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-nginx. This module is currently in development - it supports a few use cases: * Create a vhost * Create multiple location references for a vhost * Create Proxy Upstream references to be used by Nginx * Allow

I am attempting to pipe the output of smbtar into gzip in a script. The problem that I have is that smbtar echo's out "Params count: 11" before sending the information out to gzip. This causes the tar file to have a "tar: directory checksum error" error. Is there any way I can get smbtar not to report the Params count? The following is the command I am using.

Hi everybody, I still have trouble gettin' winbind running correctly and as time passes by and all documentation and mailing lists have been read, things are getting really urgent... I think i should abstract the problem to the mininmun: winbind is up and running, wbinfo -u works, getenv password works, wbinfo -t states that ---> Secret is bad and winbind-logfile says to check

Hi, Please find the attached patch for review. -Stepan. John McCall wrote: > On Oct 28, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: >> I found next code when switch instruction differs: >> >> Engine.logf("right switch has extra case %r")<< CaseValue; >> >> Where CaseValue is a ConstantInt object. Looking how logf works I found >> that it

Hi all. The question about 'load' instruction. When we promote v2i5 = load <addr> ; <MemoryVT = v2i5> to v2i64 = load <addr> ;<MemoryVT = v2i5> should we insert vector shuffling that moves second v2i5 item to the second v2i64 item? Or it is still depends from target? Thanks. -Stepan.

Hi all. Is there any way to look how my changes affected on compile and exec time, except looking at global test-suite compile and exec time? In another words is there any way to detect regression/improvement for particular tests? Thanks! -Stepan.

I hope you don?t mind us using this mailing list for a small advertisement, but we think it is most relevant for this group: We'd like to invite you to RIOT 2020 - the 5rd workshop on R Implementation, Optimization and Tooling [1]. It will take place co-located with, and during, useR! 2020 in St. Louis on July 8th. RIOT is an excellent venue for deep technical discussions about R

I just want to update test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/feature.ll that already uses grep. It uses grep + count, probably due to shorter construction. -Stepan. Eric Christopher wrote: > > On May 24, 2012, at 12:12 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: > >> Hi all. I found that if you want to use grep with escape characters in >> lit, you should pass it within the double slash (\\). Since

ping. -Stepan. Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: > Hi, > > Please find the attached patch for review. > > -Stepan. > > John McCall wrote: >> On Oct 28, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: >>> I found next code when switch instruction differs: >>> >>> Engine.logf("right switch has extra case %r")<< CaseValue; >>>

Hi all, I propose simple improvement for MergeFunctions pass, that reduced its complexity from O(N^2) to O(log(N)), where N is number of functions in module. The idea, is to replace the result of comparison from "bool" to "-1,0,1". In another words: define order relation on functions set. To be sure, that functions could be comparable that way, we have to prove that order

Hi everybody. I found that there are some problems with symbol location in AsmParser. 1. We need to know where symbol was declared. 2. We need to know where symbol was defined first time. There are two ways: 1. Add helper table to the parser with additional symbol info. But it takes additional memory consumption. 2. Add user tag (void*) for MCSymbol object. As I understood MCSymbol can live

Yes. It doesn't works properly. I also read the your discussion in bug 1784: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1784 I found that know Type and Vector Lagalization and in DAGCombining implicitly assumed that element size of MemoryVT is multiply of 8 bits. Thats the main reason why v2i5 works improperly with load/store. But I can't determine exactly what MemoryVT means... -Stepan.

Well... each case is represented as pair<BB, vector<Range> >. Right? We need "union" for optimal case building. And we need support "difference" if we decided that some ranges or numbers in case will never used (in some optimization passes it happens sometimes). -Stepan 26.04.2012, 15:18, "Duncan Sands" <baldrick at free.fr>: > Hi Stepan, >

Hi Tobias, > I can't really see a way to combine our approach with your patch. What > are your thoughts? I think it is possible. Even more - we need to combine our efforts, in order to bring this pass into real live. I'have read your presentation file, and unfortunately read your patch only a little. How exactly you scan functions on 2nd stage? Could you explain the algorithm in

Hi. I just want to know does anyone has the same problem or not. After running "make check-lit" tests are stopped at 61th percent (Linker tests). Each time it stops on different tests. Thanks. -- Regards, Stepan

Stepan, If you interested in only running a subset of the suite, then you can just cd to the associated subdirectory and execute the make command there. Due to the structuring of the makefile it's rather difficult to run an individual test. If you want to setup the structure of the test-suite (say after a fresh checkout/build) I've found that 'make -n' is helpful. It will allow

Probably, I misunderstood MemoryVT purpose? Should it be a type that equal to original vector type (e.g. v2i5). Or it is a type of memory area for this vector (e.g. v2i8) ? -Stepan. Stepan Dyatkovskiy wrote: > Hi all. The question about 'load' instruction. > When we promote > v2i5 = load<addr> ;<MemoryVT = v2i5> > to > v2i64 = load<addr> ;<MemoryVT

Hello, On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 09:30:59AM -0700, William Dunlap wrote: > Why don't you use > stopifnot( all(m1 == m2) ) > ? good question. Even though I use aseert np.all(m1 == m2) when working with NumPy, I got accustomed to the "handy shortcut" that I can omit all() with R vectors and matrices. Then I got trapped with the thing I reported. On a second thought,

Hi all, Previous patch has been split onto series of small changes. On each stage (after each patch) MergeFunctions pass is compilable and stable. Please find patches in attachment for review. To apply all patches at once, use "apply-patches.sh" script as follows: 0. Place "apply-patches.sh" in same directory with patches. 1. cd <llvm-sources-dir> 2. "bash

Hi David, After merging we always remove body of "G" (function we want to merge with "existing" one). In case with "writeThunk" we could add such info for "G", but it would be just a single string: reference to first string of "G". Ideal way here, is to merge debug information itself, and provide "F" with information for "G"